share_log

Spotify Technology S.A. (NYSE:SPOT) Is Largely Controlled by Institutional Shareholders Who Own 61% of the Company

Spotify Technology S.A. (NYSE:SPOT) Is Largely Controlled by Institutional Shareholders Who Own 61% of the Company

spotify technology股份有限公司(紐交所:SPOT)主要由機構股東控制,其擁有公司的61%。
Simply Wall St ·  07/01 21:24

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Spotify Technology implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • 52% of the business is held by the top 9 shareholders
  • Insider ownership in Spotify Technology is 18%
  • 機構對Spotify Technology的大量持有意味着他們對公司的股票價格具有重大影響。
  • 前9大股東持有業務的52%。
  • Spotify Technology的內部所有權爲18%。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Spotify Technology S.A. (NYSE:SPOT), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 61% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果想要了解Spotify Technology S.A.(紐交所:SPOT)到底由誰真正控制,了解企業的所有權結構非常重要。我們可以看到機構持有公司的61%所有權。換句話說,該集團面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

由於機構擁有巨額資金,他們的市場舉動往往受到零售或個人投資者的嚴密審查。因此,機構在公司中的大量投資通常被認爲是一個積極的特徵。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Spotify Technology, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入探討Spotify Technology的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:SPOT Ownership Breakdown July 1st 2024
紐交所:SPOT所有權構成分析-2024年7月1日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Spotify Technology?

機構所有權能告訴我們關於Spotify Technology的什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Spotify Technology. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Spotify Technology's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

正如您所看到的,機構投資者在Spotify Technology中有相當大的股份。這表明專業投資者對其具有一定的信譽。但我們不能僅僅依賴這個事實,因爲機構有時會做出錯誤的投資,就像其他人一樣。如果多家機構同時改變對一個股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得關注Spotify Technology的收益歷史記錄,當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:SPOT Earnings and Revenue Growth July 1st 2024
紐交所:SPOT的盈利和營收增長-2024年7月1日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Spotify Technology. Because actions speak louder than words, we consider it a good sign when insiders own a significant stake in a company. In Spotify Technology's case, its Top Key Executive, Sven Lorentzon, is the largest shareholder, holding 11% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 11% and 8.4%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Additionally, the company's CEO Daniel Ek directly holds 6.7% of the total shares outstanding.

投資者應該注意到,機構實際上擁有公司的一半以上,因此他們可以集體行使重大權力。對於Spotify Technology而言,其首席重要高管Sven Lorentzon是最大的股東,持有發行股票的11%。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有11%和8.4%的發行股份。此外,該公司CEO Daniel Ek直接持有發行總股本的6.7%。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 9 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

進一步調查發現,超過一半的公司股份由前9大股東持有,這表明較大股東的利益在一定程度上被小股東平衡了。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然仔細研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師對該股票的看法也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在跟蹤該股票,因此了解他們對於未來發展的總體看法可能會有所幫助。

Insider Ownership Of Spotify Technology

Spotify Technology的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

雖然內部人士的精確定義可能是主觀的,幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。管理層最終向董事會負責。但是,如果他們是創始人或CEO,經理成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Spotify Technology S.A.. Insiders own US$11b worth of shares in the US$62b company. That's quite meaningful. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們最近數據表明,內部人士擁有Spotify Technology S.A.的合理比例。內部人士在這家市值爲620億美元的公司中擁有價值110億美元的股票。這非常有意義。您可以在此處查看最近這些內部人員是否一直在購買。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 12% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

普通公衆,包括散戶投資者,在該公司中擁有12%的股份,因此不能輕易忽略他們。雖然這種所有權規模相當可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致,則可能不足以改變公司政策。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有權

Public companies currently own 8.4% of Spotify Technology stock. We can't be certain but it is quite possible this is a strategic stake. The businesses may be similar, or work together.

公共公司目前擁有Spotify Technology股票的8.4%。我們不確定,但很可能這是一項戰略性的持股。這些企業可能很相似,或者在某些領域合作。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Spotify Technology better, we need to consider many other factors. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for Spotify Technology that you should be aware of before investing here.

始終值得考慮擁有公司股票的不同群體。但要更好地了解Spotify Technology,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,在此之前,我們已發現了Spotify Technology的一個警告信號,您在此投資之前應該了解。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論