share_log

Institutional Investors Control 74% of Independent Bank Corporation (NASDAQ:IBCP) and Were Rewarded Last Week After Stock Increased 13%

Institutional Investors Control 74% of Independent Bank Corporation (NASDAQ:IBCP) and Were Rewarded Last Week After Stock Increased 13%

機構投資者控制着美國獨立銀行股份公司(納斯達克: IBCP)的74%,在股票上漲13%後上周獲得回報
Simply Wall St ·  06/29 21:41

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Independent Bank's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • 52% of the business is held by the top 12 shareholders
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 機構持股顯著高,意味着美國獨立銀行的股價對機構交易行爲敏感。
  • 12位股東持有該業務的52%
  • 內部人員最近一直在賣出。

A look at the shareholders of Independent Bank Corporation (NASDAQ:IBCP) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 74% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

看看美國獨立銀行(NASDAQ:IBCP)的股東可以告訴我們哪個組最強大。我們可以看到,機構擁有公司74%的所有權。換句話說,該集團面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)

Last week's 13% gain means that institutional investors were on the positive end of the spectrum even as the company has shown strong longer-term trends. One-year return to shareholders is currently 66% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake.

上週的13%收益意味着機構投資者即使在公司顯示強勁的長期趨勢的同時也處於正面。股東的一年回報率目前爲66%,上週的收益是錦上添花。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Independent Bank.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東對美國獨立銀行的影響。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:IBCP Ownership Breakdown June 29th 2024
納斯達克股票代碼IBCP所有權分解爲2024年6月29日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Independent Bank?

機構持股告訴我們有關美國獨立銀行的什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

Independent Bank already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Independent Bank's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

美國獨立銀行已經在股權註冊表上擁有機構。事實上,他們在公司中擁有可觀的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經查看了股票,並且他們喜歡它。但是像其他人一樣,他們可能是錯誤的。如果多個機構同時改變他們對股票的看法,您可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得查看美國獨立銀行的收益歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:IBCP Earnings and Revenue Growth June 29th 2024
納斯達克股票代碼IBCP的收益和營業收入增長爲2024年6月29日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. It would appear that 7.4% of Independent Bank shares are controlled by hedge funds. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc. with 13% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 7.4% and 5.2%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. In addition, we found that William Kessel, the CEO has 0.7% of the shares allocated to their name.

投資者應該注意,機構實際上擁有公司的一半以上股份,因此他們可以共同行使重大的權力。看來獨立銀行的7.4%股份由對沖基金控制。這很有趣,因爲對沖基金可以非常活躍和激進。許多人尋找中期催化劑,以推動股價上漲。從我們的數據中可以看出,最大的股東是BlackRock,股份佔13%。與此同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有股份總數的7.4%和5.2%。此外,我們發現首席執行官William Kessel擁有自己命名的0.7%股份。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 52% of the ownership is controlled by the top 12 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

查看股東登記表可以看到,52%的所有權由前12位股東控制,這意味着沒有單個股東擁有多數所有權。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

研究機構持股情況是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以取得相同的結果。相當多的分析師涵蓋了這筆股票,所以你可以很容易地調查預測增長。

Insider Ownership Of Independent Bank

美國獨立銀行的內部股權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

雖然內部人士的精確定義可能是主觀的,幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。管理層最終向董事會負責。但是,如果他們是創始人或CEO,經理成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

We can see that insiders own shares in Independent Bank Corporation. It has a market capitalization of just US$533m, and insiders have US$13m worth of shares, in their own names. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們可以看到美國獨立銀行的內部人士擁有股份。它的市值僅爲5.33億美元,內部人士擁有自己名下價值1300萬美元的股票。看到內部人士的一些投資是好的,但是值得檢查這些內部人士是否一直在購買。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 16% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Independent Bank. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

擁有16%的普通公衆股份,大多由個人投資者組成,可以對獨立銀行產生一定的影響。雖然這種所有權的規模可能不足以影響他們的政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should learn about the 2 warning signs we've spotted with Independent Bank (including 1 which is significant) .

我認爲查看公司的實際所有者非常有趣。但是,爲了真正獲得洞察力,我們需要考慮其他信息。爲此,您應該了解我們已發現的2個警告信號(包括1個重要警告信號)的詳細信息。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論