share_log

1st Source Corporation's (NASDAQ:SRCE) Large Institutional Owners Must Be Happy as Stock Continues to Impress, up 6.4% Over the Past Week

1st Source Corporation's (NASDAQ:SRCE) Large Institutional Owners Must Be Happy as Stock Continues to Impress, up 6.4% Over the Past Week

納斯達克:1st Source Corporation(SRCE)的大型機構持有者必須感到高興,因爲股票保持強勁,過去一週上漲6.4%
Simply Wall St ·  06/29 20:54

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies 1st Source's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • A total of 9 investors have a majority stake in the company with 52% ownership
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 顯著高的機構持股意味着1st Source的股票價格對其交易行爲非常敏感。
  • 總共有9個投資者擁有該公司52%的所有權。
  • 內部人員最近一直在賣出。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of 1st Source Corporation (NASDAQ:SRCE), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 47% to be precise, is institutions. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

要了解1st Source Corporation(納斯達克:SRCE)真正掌控權的歸屬,了解企業的所有權結構是很重要的。在公司中持有最多股票的團體,確切地說是佔約47%的機構。也就是說,如果股票上漲(或下跌),這個團體將最受益(或最受損失) 。

And things are looking up for institutional investors after the company gained US$79m in market cap last week. One-year return to shareholders is currently 31% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake.

在上週增加了7900萬美元市值之後,機構投資者的前景正在好轉。 股東的一年回報率目前爲31%,上週的收益是錦上添花。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of 1st Source, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入了解1st Source的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:SRCE Ownership Breakdown June 29th 2024
NasdaqGS:SRCE 這幅圖表顯示了股權分佈情況 (2024年6月29日)

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About 1st Source?

機構所有權告訴我們關於1st Source的什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

1st Source already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see 1st Source's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

1st Source已經有機構持股。實際上,他們在公司中擁有可觀的股權。這可能表明公司在投資社區中具有一定的信譽度。但是,最好不要過分依賴來自機構投資者的所謂驗證。他們也有時會出錯。當多個機構擁有一支股票時,總是有一種風險,他們會參與“擁擠”的交易。當這種交易出錯時,多個方可能會競相快速出售股票。在沒有成長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。您可以在下面看到1st Source的歷史收入和營業收入,但請記住,故事總是更復雜的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:SRCE Earnings and Revenue Growth June 29th 2024
NasdaqGS:SRCE 這幅圖表顯示了營收與收益的增長情況 (2024年6月29日)

Hedge funds don't have many shares in 1st Source. With a 18% stake, CEO Christopher Murphy is the largest shareholder. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 6.4% and 5.9%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

對於1st Source而言,對沖基金持股不多。擁有18%的股份的首席執行官Christopher Murphy是最大的股東。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有流通股的6.4%和5.9%。

We also observed that the top 9 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

我們還觀察到,前9大股東持有超過股份註冊的一半,還有一些小股東平衡大股東的利益。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然仔細研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師對該股票的看法也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在跟蹤該股票,因此了解他們對於未來發展的總體看法可能會有所幫助。

Insider Ownership Of 1st Source

1st Source的內部持股

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

雖然內部人士的精確定義可能是主觀的,幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。管理層最終向董事會負責。但是,如果他們是創始人或CEO,經理成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in 1st Source Corporation. Insiders own US$403m worth of shares in the US$1.3b company. That's quite meaningful. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的信息表明,內部人持有1st Source Corporation的大量股票。內部人擁有這家市值13億美元的公司中價值4.03億美元的股票,這相當重要。大多數人都會認爲,這顯示出與股東的良好對齊。尤其是在這樣一個規模的公司中。您可以點擊此處查看內部人是否一直在購買或銷售。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 19% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

包括散戶投資者在內的普通公衆擁有該公司19%的股份,因此不能輕易忽略他們。儘管這種所有權的大小可能不足以在其利益方面左右政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 1 warning sign for 1st Source that you should be aware of.

我覺得看一個公司到底由誰擁有非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得洞察力,我們需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們已經爲1st Source識別出了一個警示信號,您應該注意。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論