share_log

With 72% Ownership, McDonald's Corporation (NYSE:MCD) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing

With 72% Ownership, McDonald's Corporation (NYSE:MCD) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing

麥當勞公司(紐交所:MCD)擁有72%的機構支持,實力雄厚。
Simply Wall St ·  06/28 21:17

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies McDonald's' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • 43% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 顯著的高機構持股意味着麥當勞股價對他們的交易行爲非常敏感。
  • 前25名股東持有43%的業務。
  • 內部人員最近一直在賣出。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of McDonald's Corporation (NYSE:MCD), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 72% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

爲了了解麥當勞公司(NYSE:MCD)真正掌控的人,理解企業所有權結構非常重要。我們可以看到機構在公司中擁有最多的股份,佔有72%的股權。換句話說,此集團將在投資該公司中獲得最多(或失去最多)。

Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

由於機構有許多資金,因此他們的市場走勢往往會受到零售或個人投資者的密切關注。因此,機構投資公司的良好部分通常是對其未來充滿信心的重要標誌。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of McDonald's, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入探討每種麥當勞所有者,從下面的圖表開始。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:MCD Ownership Breakdown June 28th 2024
NYSE:MCD所有權結構分佈2024年6月28日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About McDonald's?

機構所有權告訴我們關於McDonald's的什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

McDonald's already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at McDonald's' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

麥當勞已經有機構在股份註冊表上了,確實擁有公司的可觀股份。這表明在專業投資者中有一定信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這一事實,因爲機構有時會犯錯誤,就像每個人一樣。如果多個機構同時改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此看一下下面的麥當勞收益歷史值得一提。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:MCD Earnings and Revenue Growth June 28th 2024
NYSE:MCD收益和營業收入增長2024年6月28日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in McDonald's. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 9.6% of shares outstanding. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 7.0% of common stock, and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. holds about 4.8% of the company stock.

投資者應該注意,機構實際上擁有公司超過一半的股份,因此它們可以共同行使重大權力。我們注意到對沖基金對麥當勞沒有實質性的投資。現時最大的股東是Vanguard Group, Inc.,持有9.6%的股票。BlackRock, Inc.是第二大股東,持有7.0%的普通股,而State Street Global Advisors, Inc.則持有公司股票的約4.8%。

On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.

經過我們的所有權數據研究,我們發現前25位股東共同擁有不到50%的股份,表明沒有任何個人擁有多數利益。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然仔細研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師對該股票的看法也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在跟蹤該股票,因此了解他們對於未來發展的總體看法可能會有所幫助。

Insider Ownership Of McDonald's

McDonald's的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

內部人員的定義在不同國家可能會稍有不同,但董事會成員始終算入其中。公司管理負責經營業務,但即使首席執行官是董事會成員,他或她也必須對董事會負責。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of McDonald's Corporation in their own names. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$393m worth of shares (at current prices). In this sort of situation, it can be more interesting to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的數據顯示,內部人員以自己的名義擁有不到1%的麥當勞公司股份。這是一家非常大的公司,戶主擁有公司的大部分持股可能會令人驚訝。雖然他們持有的股份不到1%,但我們可以看到董事會成員共持有價值3.93億美元的股份(按當前價格計算)。在這種情況下,更有趣的是看看這些內部人員是否一直在購買或出售股票。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 28% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

一般公衆(包括零售投資者)持有該公司28%的股份,因此不能被忽視。雖然持股規模非常可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,則可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand McDonald's better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 2 warning signs with McDonald's , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

始終考慮擁有公司股份的不同集團是值得的。但爲了更好地了解麥當勞,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,不斷存在的投資風險。我們已經確定了麥當勞的2個警示信號,並且了解它們應該是您投資過程的一部分。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論