share_log

Matson, Inc.'s (NYSE:MATX) High Institutional Ownership Speaks for Itself as Stock Continues to Impress, up 4.8% Over Last Week

Matson, Inc.'s (NYSE:MATX) High Institutional Ownership Speaks for Itself as Stock Continues to Impress, up 4.8% Over Last Week

Matson,Inc.(紐交所:MATX)的高機構持股已經證明了自身實力,股票在上週上漲了4.8%。
Simply Wall St ·  06/28 19:58

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Matson implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • 52% of the business is held by the top 7 shareholders
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 機構對Matson的大量持股意味着它們對公司的股價具有重大影響力。
  • 前7大股東持有該公司52%的股份。
  • 近期內有內部人士出售股票

Every investor in Matson, Inc. (NYSE:MATX) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 79% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

Matson, Inc. (紐交所:MATX) 的每個投資者都應注意到最強大的股東群體。而持有79%股份的機構群體擁有最大的股份。這也意味着,如果股票上漲,他們將獲得最多收益(或如果市場出現下滑,他們將承受最大虧損)。

And last week, institutional investors ended up benefitting the most after the company hit US$4.4b in market cap. One-year return to shareholders is currently 68% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake.

上週,機構投資者因該公司市值達到44億美元而獲得最大利益。股東的一年回報率目前爲68%,上週的收益是錦上添花。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Matson.

在下面的圖表中,我們將重點關注Matson的不同所有權群體。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:MATX Ownership Breakdown June 28th 2024
紐交所:MATX股權結構2024年6月28日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Matson?

機構持股對Matson有何影響?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

Matson already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Matson, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

Matson已經有機構在股東名冊上,他們在公司中擁有令人尊敬的股份。這表明專業投資者之間存在信任。但我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時也會做出糟糕的投資,就像其他人一樣。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時嘗試退出股票,股價下跌是很常見的。因此,值得檢查Matson的過去業績軌跡(如下圖所示)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:MATX Earnings and Revenue Growth June 28th 2024
紐交所:MATX收入與利潤增長情況,截止到2024年6月28日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. It would appear that 6.2% of Matson shares are controlled by hedge funds. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. The company's largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc., with ownership of 16%. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 12% of common stock, and Dimensional Fund Advisors LP holds about 7.4% of the company stock. In addition, we found that Matthew Cox, the CEO has 0.6% of the shares allocated to their name.

由於機構投資者擁有超過半數的發行股份,董事會可能會注意到他們的偏好。事實上,6.2%的Matson股份由對沖基金控制。這很有趣,因爲對沖基金可能會非常積極和激進。許多人尋找中期推動股價上漲的催化劑。公司的最大股東是BlackRock, Inc.,持股16%。第二大股東是The Vanguard Group, Inc.,擁有12%的普通股,而Dimensional Fund Advisors LP持有約7.4%的公司股票。此外,我們發現首席執行官Matthew Cox擁有公司股份的0.6%。

We also observed that the top 7 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

我們還觀察到,前7名股東擁有超過一半的股份登記冊,還有一些小股東來平衡較大股東的利益。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.

儘管有必要研究公司的機構持股數據,但研究分析師的情緒也是有道理的,以了解風向。這隻股票有一些分析師的覆蓋,但不多。因此,有提高更多的分析涵蓋面的空間。

Insider Ownership Of Matson

Matson的內部股東

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

內部人員的定義在不同國家可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計入內部人員。管理層最終向董事會回答。然而,經理往往會成爲執行董事會成員,尤其是如果他們是創始人或CEO。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Matson, Inc.. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$101m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們最近的數據表明,Matson, Inc.的內部股東擁有一些股份。這是一家大公司,因此看到這種程度的一致性是好的。內部股東擁有價值1.01億美元的股份(按當前價格計算)。大多數人會認爲這顯示了股東和董事會之間的利益一致。但仍需查看這些內部股東是否一直在賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 12% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Matson. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

持有12%的一般公衆,大多數是個人投資者,對Matson有一定的影響力。雖然這種所有權規模可能不足以在某個政策決策方面產生影響,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 3 warning signs for Matson (of which 1 is concerning!) you should know about.

雖然考慮擁有一家公司的不同群體很值得,但有其他更重要的因素。就像風險一樣。每個公司都有風險,我們發現Matson存在3個警示信號(其中1個令人擔憂!)需要注意。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論