share_log

Individual Investors Are Orchestra BioMed Holdings, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:OBIO) Biggest Owners and Were Rewarded After Market Cap Rose by US$73m Last Week

Individual Investors Are Orchestra BioMed Holdings, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:OBIO) Biggest Owners and Were Rewarded After Market Cap Rose by US$73m Last Week

個人投資者是Orchestra BioMed Holdings,Inc.(納斯達克:OBIO)最大的股東,在市值上漲了7300萬美元后獲得了回報。
Simply Wall St ·  06/28 18:30

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significant control over Orchestra BioMed Holdings by individual investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • 52% of the business is held by the top 6 shareholders
  • Recent purchases by insiders
  • 個人投資者對Orchestra BioMed Holdings的重大控制意味着公衆擁有更大的影響管理和治理相關決策的權力
  • 52% 的業務由前6名股東持有
  • 內部人士最近的購買

If you want to know who really controls Orchestra BioMed Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:OBIO), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that individual investors own the lion's share in the company with 37% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果你想知道誰真正控制着Orchestra BioMed Holdings, Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:OBIO),那麼你必須看看其股票登記處的構成。我們可以看到,個人投資者擁有公司的大部分股份,所有權爲37%。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果出現低迷,則損失最大)。

Clearly, individual investors benefitted the most after the company's market cap rose by US$73m last week.

顯然,在上週該公司的市值上漲了7300萬美元之後,個人投資者受益最大。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Orchestra BioMed Holdings, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究Orchestra BioMed Holdings的每種類型的所有者。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGM:OBIO Ownership Breakdown June 28th 2024
NasdaqGM:OBIO 所有權明細 2024 年 6 月 28 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Orchestra BioMed Holdings?

關於樂團生物醫學控股公司,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Orchestra BioMed Holdings. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Orchestra BioMed Holdings, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

如你所見,機構投資者持有Orchestra BioMed Holdings的大量股份。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得查看Orchestra BioMed Holdings過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGM:OBIO Earnings and Revenue Growth June 28th 2024
NasdaqGM: OBIO 收益和收入增長 2024 年 6 月 28 日

Our data indicates that hedge funds own 16% of Orchestra BioMed Holdings. That worth noting, since hedge funds are often quite active investors, who may try to influence management. Many want to see value creation (and a higher share price) in the short term or medium term. Medtronic plc is currently the largest shareholder, with 16% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 16% and 7.1%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Furthermore, CEO David Hochman is the owner of 0.7% of the company's shares.

我們的數據顯示,對沖基金擁有樂團生物醫學控股公司16%的股份。這值得注意,因爲對沖基金通常是非常活躍的投資者,他們可能會試圖影響管理層。許多人希望在短期或中期內看到價值創造(以及更高的股價)。美敦力集團目前是最大股東,已發行股份的16%。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的16%和7.1%。此外,首席執行官戴維·霍赫曼持有該公司0.7%的股份。

We did some more digging and found that 6 of the top shareholders account for roughly 52% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我們做了進一步的挖掘,發現大股東中有6人約佔登記冊的52%,這意味着除了較大的股東外,還有一些較小的股東,從而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。有很多分析師在報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。

Insider Ownership Of Orchestra BioMed Holdings

樂團生物醫學控股公司的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終算在內。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行委員會成員的情況並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Orchestra BioMed Holdings, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$246m, and insiders have US$6.0m worth of shares, in their own names. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

股東們可能會有興趣得知內部人士擁有Orchestra BioMed Holdings, Inc.的股份。它的市值僅爲2.46億美元,內部人士以自己的名義持有價值600萬美元的股票。這至少顯示出一定的對齊性。你可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 37% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Orchestra BioMed Holdings. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

Orchestra BioMed Holdings擁有37%的所有權,主要由個人投資者組成,對Orchestra BioMed Holdings有一定程度的影響力。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股權所有權

With a stake of 12%, private equity firms could influence the Orchestra BioMed Holdings board. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.

私募股權公司持有12%的股份,可能會影響樂團生物醫學控股公司的董事會。一些投資者可能會爲此感到鼓舞,因爲私募股權有時能夠鼓勵制定有助於市場看到公司價值的策略。或者,這些持有人可能會在投資上市後退出投資。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有權

We can see that public companies hold 16% of the Orchestra BioMed Holdings shares on issue. It's hard to say for sure but this suggests they have entwined business interests. This might be a strategic stake, so it's worth watching this space for changes in ownership.

我們可以看到,上市公司持有樂團生物醫學控股公司16%的已發行股份。很難肯定地說,但這表明它們將商業利益交織在一起。這可能是一個戰略利害關係,因此值得關注這個領域的所有權變動。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Orchestra BioMed Holdings better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - Orchestra BioMed Holdings has 3 warning signs (and 1 which can't be ignored) we think you should know about.

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,爲了更好地了解Orchestra BioMed Holdings,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。舉個風險吧——Orchestra BioMed Holdings有3個警告信號(其中一個不容忽視),我們認爲你應該知道。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一樣,你可能需要考慮這家公司是會成長還是會萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份免費報告,其中顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team@simplywallst.com

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論