share_log

With 68% Institutional Ownership, Pfizer Inc. (NYSE:PFE) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns

With 68% Institutional Ownership, Pfizer Inc. (NYSE:PFE) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns

憑藉68%的機構持股,輝瑞公司(紐交所:PFE)是大型機構的最愛。
Simply Wall St ·  06/27 01:57

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Pfizer's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • 44% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
  • Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 機構高比例持股意味着輝瑞的股票價格對他們的交易行爲非常敏感。
  • 前25個股東持有44%的業務。
  • 所有權研究和分析師預測數據有助於更好地了解股票市場的機會。

A look at the shareholders of Pfizer Inc. (NYSE:PFE) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 68% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

觀察輝瑞股份有限公司(紐交所:PFE)的股東可以告訴我們哪個組織是最有影響力的。擁有公司股份最多的投資者組合,準確說約佔68%,是機構。換句話說,該組合面臨最大的增長潛力(或下行風險)。

Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

由於機構擁有巨額資金,他們的市場舉動往往受到零售或個人投資者的嚴密審查。因此,機構在公司中的大量投資通常被認爲是一個積極的特徵。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Pfizer.

讓我們更仔細地看看不同類型的股東可以告訴我們有關輝瑞的什麼信息。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:PFE Ownership Breakdown June 26th 2024
紐交所:PFE 2024年6月26日所有權分佈

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Pfizer?

機構持股量會影響輝瑞的投資意願,從而對輝瑞產生影響。

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

Pfizer already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Pfizer's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

輝瑞公司已有機構加入股東名冊。實際上,他們在公司中擁有可觀的股份。這可能意味着該公司在投資界擁有一定的信譽度。然而,最好不要依賴機構投資者所帶來的認可,因爲他們有時也會犯錯。當多個機構擁有一支股票時,他們總會面臨“擁擠的交易”風險。當這種交易出錯時,多個方向可能會爭相快速賣出股票。這種風險在沒有增長曆史的公司中更高。您可以在下面看到輝瑞的歷史盈利和營業收入,但要記住,這並不是完整故事的全部。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:PFE Earnings and Revenue Growth June 26th 2024
紐交所:PFE 2024年6月26日收入和收益增長率

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Pfizer is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc. with 9.0% of shares outstanding. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 7.6% of common stock, and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. holds about 5.1% of the company stock.

投資者應注意,實際上機構擁有公司的一半以上,因此他們可以集體行使重大的權力。輝瑞不是由對沖基金所有。從我們的數據來看,最大的股東是持有9.0%流通股的凡爾登集團股份有限公司。黑石集團股份有限公司擁有7.6%的普通股,道富銀行股份有限公司持有該公司股票的約5.1%。

Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.

我們的研究表明,前25大股東共控制了公司股份的不到一半,這意味着公司的股份廣泛分散,沒有主導股東。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

研究機構持股情況是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以取得相同的結果。相當多的分析師涵蓋了這筆股票,所以你可以很容易地調查預測增長。

Insider Ownership Of Pfizer

輝瑞內部持股情況

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

內部人員的定義在不同國家可能會稍有不同,但董事會成員始終算入其中。公司管理負責經營業務,但即使首席執行官是董事會成員,他或她也必須對董事會負責。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Pfizer Inc.. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$55m of stock. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們最新的數據表明,內部人持有輝瑞公司的股份不到1%。由於公司規模龐大,我們不希望內部人擁有大量的股份。他們集體擁有價值5500萬美元的股份。實際上,董事會成員擁有的股份是好事,但最好檢查這些內部人是否一直在購買。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 31% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

包括散戶投資者在內的普通大衆擁有該公司的31%股份,因此不能輕易忽略。雖然這個群體不一定能左右決策,但確實可以對公司的經營產生實質性影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Pfizer better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - Pfizer has 2 warning signs we think you should be aware of.

考慮到不同股東群體的持股情況總是值得的。但是,要更好地了解輝瑞公司,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,要考慮風險-輝瑞公司存在2個警示信號,我們認爲您應該知道。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論