share_log

Science Applications International Corporation (NASDAQ:SAIC) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 77% of the Company

Science Applications International Corporation (NASDAQ:SAIC) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 77% of the Company

機構持有人持有該公司77%的股份,贊成Science Applications International Corporation(納斯達克:SAIC)
Simply Wall St ·  06/26 23:47

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Science Applications International's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • The top 10 shareholders own 51% of the company
  • Insiders have bought recently
  • 機構持有大量股份,說明對於交易行爲,艾衛公司股價十分敏感。
  • 前十大股東擁有該公司51%的股份。
  • 內部人士最近購買了股票。

A look at the shareholders of Science Applications International Corporation (NASDAQ:SAIC) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 77% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

通過了解Science Applications International Corporation (納斯達克:SAIC) 的股東,我們可以了解哪一群體最具有影響力。機構擁有公司最大的77%的股份。這意味着,如果股票上漲,該群體將獲益最大(或如果出現下跌,則將損失最大)。

Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

由於機構擁有巨額資金,他們的市場舉動往往受到零售或個人投資者的嚴密審查。因此,機構在公司中的大量投資通常被認爲是一個積極的特徵。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Science Applications International.

圖表上,我們放大了Science Applications International的不同持股群體。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:SAIC Ownership Breakdown June 26th 2024
2024年6月26日NasdaqGS:SAIC擁有權分佈。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Science Applications International?

機構持股告訴我們有關Science Applications International的什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Science Applications International. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Science Applications International's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

正如您所看到的,機構投資者在Science Applications International中擁有相當大的股份。這表明專業投資者中有一些權威性。但我們不能僅僅依靠這一事實,因爲機構有時也會進行糟糕的投資,就像每個人一樣。當多個機構擁有一種股票時,總會有一定的風險,即它們進行了"擁擠交易"。當這種交易出現問題時,多個方面可能會競相快速賣出股票。在公司沒有成長曆史的情況下,這種風險更高。您可以在下面看到Science Applications International的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住故事不止如此。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:SAIC Earnings and Revenue Growth June 26th 2024
2024年6月26日NasdaqGS:SAIC盈利和營收增長。

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Science Applications International. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 9.8% of shares outstanding. With 9.4% and 8.2% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and Wellington Management Group LLP are the second and third largest shareholders.

投資者應注意,機構實際擁有公司超過一半的股份,因此它們可以集體行使相當大的權力。對於Science Applications International來說,對沖基金持有的股份並不多。目前,The Vanguard Group,Inc是該公司最大的股東,持有9.8%的流通股。BlackRock,Inc和Wellington Management Group LLP分別持有流通股的9.4%和8.2%,是第二和第三大股東。

We also observed that the top 10 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

我們還觀察到,前10大股東持有超過半數股份,有一些較小的股東以一定程度上平衡更大股東的利益。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目的。由於有相當數量的分析師涵蓋這支股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會有所幫助。

Insider Ownership Of Science Applications International

Science Applications International的內部持股情況

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

內部人員的定義在不同國家可能會稍有不同,但董事會成員始終算入其中。公司管理負責經營業務,但即使首席執行官是董事會成員,他或她也必須對董事會負責。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Our information suggests that Science Applications International Corporation insiders own under 1% of the company. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own US$57m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們的信息表明,Science Applications International Corporation的內部人士擁有的公司股份不到1%。請記住這是一家大公司,而內部人士持有價值5700萬美元的股票。絕對價值可能比比例份額更重要。始終看到至少有一些內部股權是好的,但檢查這些內部人士是否一直在出售可能是值得的。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 22% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Science Applications International. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

作爲一家上市公司,Science Applications International由個人投資者組成的公衆擁有22%的股份,這對於影響公司政策來說可能還不足夠。但是他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Science Applications International better, we need to consider many other factors. For instance, we've identified 3 warning signs for Science Applications International (2 can't be ignored) that you should be aware of.

了解公司股東的不同群體始終是有價值的。但是,要更好地了解Science Applications International,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,我們已經確定了科學應用國際(Science Applications International)的3個警告信號(有2個不容忽視),您應該意識到這一點。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您想發現分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這份有關分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論