share_log

Great Week for Nabors Industries Ltd. (NYSE:NBR) Institutional Investors After Losing 26% Over the Previous Year

Great Week for Nabors Industries Ltd. (NYSE:NBR) Institutional Investors After Losing 26% Over the Previous Year

納伯斯實業股份有限公司(NYSE:NBR)的機構投資者過去一年損失了26%,但上週表現良好。
Simply Wall St ·  06/26 19:29

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Nabors Industries' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • The top 10 shareholders own 51% of the company
  • Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 高機構所有權意味着納博斯工業的股價對其交易行爲很敏感
  • 前十名股東擁有公司51%的股份
  • 使用分析師預測的數據以及所有權研究,可以更好地評估公司的未來表現

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Nabors Industries Ltd. (NYSE:NBR), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 78% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

要了解誰真正控制了納博斯工業有限公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:NBR),了解業務的所有權結構非常重要。而持有最大份額的集團是擁有78%所有權的機構。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。

Last week's US$76m market cap gain would probably be appreciated by institutional investors, especially after a year of 26% losses.

機構投資者可能會對上週的7600萬美元市值收益表示讚賞,尤其是在經歷了26%的虧損之後。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Nabors Industries.

在下圖中,我們放大了納博斯工業的不同所有權群體。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:NBR Ownership Breakdown June 26th 2024
紐約證券交易所:NBR 所有權明細 2024 年 6 月 26 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Nabors Industries?

關於納博斯工業,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Nabors Industries. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Nabors Industries, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

如你所見,機構投資者在納博斯工業公司擁有相當數量的股份。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎行事,不要依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們也是,有時候會弄錯。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得查看納博斯工業公司過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:NBR Earnings and Revenue Growth June 26th 2024
紐約證券交易所:NBR 收益和收入增長 2024 年 6 月 26 日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Nabors Industries is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that BlackRock, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 16% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 8.6% and 5.2% of the stock. Additionally, the company's CEO Anthony Petrello directly holds 3.9% of the total shares outstanding.

投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有公司一半以上的股份,因此它們可以共同行使巨大的權力。納博斯工業不歸對沖基金所有。我們的數據顯示,貝萊德公司是最大股東,已發行股份的16%。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約8.6%和5.2%的股份。此外,該公司首席執行官安東尼·佩特雷洛直接持有已發行股份總額的3.9%。

We did some more digging and found that 10 of the top shareholders account for roughly 51% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我們做了進一步的挖掘,發現10位大股東約佔登記冊的51%,這意味着除了較大的股東外,還有一些較小的股東,從而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。有不少分析師報道了該股,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。

Insider Ownership Of Nabors Industries

納博斯工業的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終算在內。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行委員會成員的情況並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。

We can see that insiders own shares in Nabors Industries Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just US$668m, and insiders have US$39m worth of shares, in their own names. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們可以看到內部人士擁有納博斯工業有限公司的股份。它的市值僅爲6.68億美元,內部人士以自己的名義持有價值3900萬美元的股票。很高興看到內部人士進行一些投資,但可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 16% stake in Nabors Industries. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有納博斯工業公司16%的股份。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Nabors Industries better, we need to consider many other factors.

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,爲了更好地了解納博斯工業,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。

I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can access this interactive graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow, for free.

我喜歡更深入地了解一家公司過去的表現。您可以免費訪問這張過去的收益、收入和現金流的交互式圖表。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一樣,你可能需要考慮這家公司是會成長還是會萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份免費報告,其中顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team@simplywallst.com

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論