share_log

Public Companies Own 22% of Wilmar International Limited (SGX:F34) Shares but Private Companies Control 42% of the Company

Public Companies Own 22% of Wilmar International Limited (SGX:F34) Shares but Private Companies Control 42% of the Company

公開公司擁有威廉國際有限公司(新加坡交易所:F34)22%的股份,但私人公司控制該公司的42%。
Simply Wall St ·  06/26 07:42

Key Insights

主要見解

  • The considerable ownership by private companies in Wilmar International indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
  • A total of 3 investors have a majority stake in the company with 56% ownership
  • Insiders have been buying lately
  • 私營公司在威廉國際公司的相當所有權表明,它們共同在管理和業務策略上有更大的發言權。
  • 共有3位投資者擁有該公司的大部分股權,佔有56%的股權。
  • 內部人員最近一直在買入。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Wilmar International Limited (SGX:F34), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are private companies with 42% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

爲了了解威廉國際公司(SGX:F34)真正掌控,了解企業的所有權結構是很重要的。其中持有最多的是持有42%的私營公司。這意味着,如果股票上漲(或下跌),該組織將獲得最大的利益(或最大的損失)。

Meanwhile, public companies make up 22% of the company's shareholders.

同時,公共公司佔該公司股東的22%。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Wilmar International.

下面的圖表展示了威廉國際的不同所有權群體。

ownership-breakdown
SGX:F34 Ownership Breakdown June 25th 2024
SGX:F34所有權詳情2024年6月25日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Wilmar International?

機構所有權能告訴我們威廉國際的哪些信息?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

Wilmar International already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Wilmar International's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

威廉國際已經吸引了機構投資者的注目。實際上,他們在公司中擁有可觀的股份。這表明該公司在投資社區中具有某種可信度。然而,最好不要過分依賴機構投資者的所謂驗證。他們也有時會犯錯。如果多個機構同時改變他們對某股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得看看下面的威廉國際收入歷史情況。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SGX:F34 Earnings and Revenue Growth June 25th 2024
SGX:F34收益和營業收入增長詳情2024年6月25日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Wilmar International. Our data shows that The Kuok Group is the largest shareholder with 27% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 22% and 6.9% of the stock. Khoon Hong Kuok, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chairman of the Board.

對威廉國際的對沖基金沒有太多股份。我們的數據顯示,郭氏集團是最大的股東,擁有27%的流通股。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約22%和6.9%的股份。第三大股東郭顯宏還恰好擔任董事會主席的職務。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 3 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.

總的來說,包括散戶投資者在內,公衆擁有公司的14%的股份,因此不能輕易忽視。儘管這種所有權的規模可能不足以在他們的利益方面影響政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

儘管有道理去研究一家公司的機構所有權數據,但了解分析師的觀點也很有道理,以便知道市場的風向。由於相當多的分析師涵蓋了該股票,因此您可以很容易地研究預測的增長。

Insider Ownership Of Wilmar International

威廉國際的內部擁有情況

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

內部人員的定義在不同國家可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計入內部人員。管理層最終向董事會回答。然而,經理往往會成爲執行董事會成員,尤其是如果他們是創始人或CEO。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Wilmar International Limited. It is a very large company, and board members collectively own S$1.4b worth of shares (at current prices). we sometimes take an interest in whether they have been buying or selling.

我們最近的數據表明,內部人員擁有威廉國際有限公司的部分股份。這是一家非常大的公司,董事會成員共擁有14億新元(按當前價格計算)的股份。我們有時會關注他們是否一直在買賣。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 20% stake in Wilmar International. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

普通公衆,通常是個體投資者,持有威廉國際20%的股份。雖然這種所有權規模可能不足以影響他們的政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 42%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

我們的數據顯示,私營公司持有該公司股份的42%。值得深入研究。如果相關方,如內部人員,對其中一傢俬營公司有利益,那就應該在年度報告中披露。私營公司也可能對公司具有戰略利益。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有權

Public companies currently own 22% of Wilmar International stock. We can't be certain but it is quite possible this is a strategic stake. The businesses may be similar, or work together.

公共公司目前持有威廉國際22%的股票。我們不能確定,但很可能這是一種戰略持有。這些企業可能相似,或者有合作關係。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Wilmar International better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - Wilmar International has 3 warning signs (and 1 which is a bit concerning) we think you should know about.

思考股票的不同所有群體總是值得的。但要更好地了解威廉國際,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,風險 - 威廉國際具有3個警示標誌(其中1個有點令人擔憂),我們認爲你應該知道。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您想發現分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這份有關分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論