share_log

With 83% Ownership in ConocoPhillips (NYSE:COP), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business

With 83% Ownership in ConocoPhillips (NYSE:COP), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business

機構投資者在康菲石油(紐交所:COP)83%的持股中,對業務有很多關注點。
Simply Wall St ·  06/25 22:07

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in ConocoPhillips implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • The top 19 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 康菲石油中機構的重大持股意味着他們對公司股價有重要的影響
  • 前19大股東持有該公司50%的股份。
  • 所有權研究和分析師預測數據有助於更好地了解股票市場的機會。

Every investor in ConocoPhillips (NYSE:COP) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 83% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

紐交所:COP所有投資者都應該知道最強大的股東群體。機構持有的股份達到83%,意味着他們持有的是公司最大的股份。換句話說,該群體從他們對該公司的投資中獲得(或損失)的所得最多。

Last week's 5.1% gain means that institutional investors were on the positive end of the spectrum even as the company has shown strong longer-term trends. One-year return to shareholders is currently 17% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake.

上週5.1%的增長意味着即使當公司顯示出強勁的長期趨勢時,機構投資者也處於積極的狀態。股東的一年回報率目前爲17%,上週的增長是錦上添花。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of ConocoPhillips, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入探討康菲石油的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:COP Ownership Breakdown June 25th 2024
紐交所:COP所有權結構 2024年6月25日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About ConocoPhillips?

機構所有權告訴我們關於康菲石油什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

We can see that ConocoPhillips does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see ConocoPhillips' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我們可以看到康菲石油確實擁有機構投資者,而且他們持有公司的相當一部分股票。這可能表明公司在投資社區中具有一定的信譽度。然而,最好還是要注意不要過於依賴機構投資者所謂的認可。他們也會犯錯。當多個機構擁有一隻股票時,總會存在一種被淹沒的交易風險。當這種交易出現問題時,多個方面可能會競相快速出售股票。這種風險在公司沒有增長曆史的情況下更高。您可以在下面看到康菲石油的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住還有更多的故事。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:COP Earnings and Revenue Growth June 25th 2024
紐交所:COP營收增長 2024年6月25日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Hedge funds don't have many shares in ConocoPhillips. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 9.3% of shares outstanding. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 8.4% of common stock, and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. holds about 6.0% of the company stock.

機構投資者持有公司的50%以上的股份,因此他們共同可能會強烈影響董事會的決策。對於康菲石油,對沖基金並沒有擁有太多股票。道富銀行目前是最大的股東,擁有9.3%的流通股,黑石集團是第二大股東,擁有8.4%的普通股,道富環球投資者持有公司股份的約6.0%。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 19 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

經過進一步的挖掘,我們發現前19名股東在公司中擁有50%的股份,這表明沒有單一股東對公司具有重大控制力。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然仔細研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師對該股票的看法也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在跟蹤該股票,因此了解他們對於未來發展的總體看法可能會有所幫助。

Insider Ownership Of ConocoPhillips

康菲石油內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

內部人員的定義在不同國家可能會稍有不同,但董事會成員始終算入其中。公司管理負責經營業務,但即使首席執行官是董事會成員,他或她也必須對董事會負責。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of ConocoPhillips. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$112m worth of shares. In this sort of situation, it can be more interesting to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們最近的數據表明,康菲石油內部人士持有不到1%的股份。由於它是一家大型公司,我們只希望內部人士擁有其中很小一部分。但值得注意的是,他們擁有價值1.12億美元的股份。在這種情況下,更有趣的是看看那些內部人士是否一直在買賣。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 17% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

一般公衆(包括零售投資者)擁有公司17%的股份,因此不能輕易忽略。雖然這種擁有量相當大,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with ConocoPhillips , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

我覺得看一個公司的真正所有者非常有趣。但是爲了真正獲得洞察力,我們需要考慮其他信息。例如,投資風險一直存在。我們已經確定了康菲石油的一個警告信號,了解它們應該是您的投資過程的一部分。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論