share_log

With 86% Ownership, Evergy, Inc. (NASDAQ:EVRG) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing

With 86% Ownership, Evergy, Inc. (NASDAQ:EVRG) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing

擁有86%股權,Evergy, Inc. (納斯達克:EVRG)備受強有力的機構支持。
Simply Wall St ·  06/25 18:57

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Evergy implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • The top 20 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 機構持有Evergy的大量股份意味着他們對公司股價有重大影響力。
  • 前20大股東持有該公司50%的股份。
  • 分析師預測以及所有者數據可以給我們提供有關業務前景的強烈想法。

Every investor in Evergy, Inc. (NASDAQ:EVRG) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 86% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

納斯達克:EVRG的每個投資者都應該了解最強大的股東群體。我們可以看到機構擁有該公司的絕大部分股份,佔86%的所有權。換句話說,該群體面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

由於機構擁有大量的資金和研究能力,因此機構所有權往往具有相當的分量,特別是對於個人投資者。因此,機構在一家企業中投資的規模可視爲該企業的一項重要資產。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Evergy.

在下圖中,我們放大了Evergy不同的所有權群體。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:EVRG Ownership Breakdown June 25th 2024
納斯達克GS:EVRG股權結構分析報告 2024年6月25日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Evergy?

機構持股告訴我們什麼關於Evergy?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

We can see that Evergy does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Evergy's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我們可以看到Evergy確實有機構投資者,他們持有公司股票的很大一部分。這表明在專業投資者中具有一定的信譽度。但我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會犯錯誤的投資,就像每個人一樣。當多個機構擁有一隻股票時,總會有一種“擁擠交易”的風險。當這樣的交易出現問題時,多方面可能競相快速出售股票。在一個沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。您可以在下面看到Evergy的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多的情節。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:EVRG Earnings and Revenue Growth June 25th 2024
納斯達克GS:EVRG盈利和營收增長分析報告 2024年6月25日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Evergy. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 14% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 7.4% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 6.9% by the third-largest shareholder.

由於機構投資者擁有超過發行股票的一半,董事會可能需要注意他們的偏好。對於Evergy來說,對沖基金持有的股數不多。目前,The Vanguard Group,Inc.是最大的股東,持有14%的流通股。作爲對比,第二大股東持有約7.4%的流通股,第三大股東持有6.9%的所有權。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 20 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

對我們所有權數據的進一步觀察表明,前20大股東持有50%的股份,這意味着沒有單一股東擁有多數股份。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

儘管研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以深入了解股票的預期表現。有許多分析師對這支股票進行了覆蓋,因此了解他們的預測可能值得一試。

Insider Ownership Of Evergy

Evergy的內部股權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

內部人員的定義在不同國家可能會稍有不同,但董事會成員始終算入其中。公司管理負責經營業務,但即使首席執行官是董事會成員,他或她也必須對董事會負責。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Evergy, Inc.. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$39m of stock. In this sort of situation, it can be more interesting to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們最近的數據表明,內部人持有Evergy,Inc.的股份不到1%。由於規模如此之大,我們不會期望內部人持有大量股票。總體而言,他們擁有3900萬美元的股票。在這種情況下,更有趣的是看看這些內部人是否一直在購買或出售股票。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 14% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

我認爲查看公司的實際所有者非常有趣。但是爲了獲得真正的見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,風險 - Cadence銀行有3個需要引起我們關注的警告信號。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 2 warning signs for Evergy (of which 1 is concerning!) you should know about.

我發現對於公司股權結構的探究非常有趣,但要真正獲得洞察力,我們需要考慮其他信息。例如風險。每家公司都有風險,我們已經發現了Evergy的2個警告信號(其中1個令人擔憂!)您應該知道。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論