share_log

International Business Machines Corporation (NYSE:IBM) Is Largely Controlled by Institutional Shareholders Who Own 61% of the Company

International Business Machines Corporation (NYSE:IBM) Is Largely Controlled by Institutional Shareholders Who Own 61% of the Company

國際商業機器公司(紐交所:IBM)主要由機構股東控制,機構股東持有該公司61%的股份。
Simply Wall St ·  06/24 19:45

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, International Business Machines' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 40% ownership
  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 由於機構持有國際商業機器公司的大量股份,因此其股價可能容易受到機構交易決策的影響。
  • 25家投資者持有公司的多數股權,佔有40%的所有權。
  • 分析師預測以及所有者數據可以給我們提供有關業務前景的強烈想法。

If you want to know who really controls International Business Machines Corporation (NYSE:IBM), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 61% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果您想知道誰真正控制國際商業機器公司(紐交所:IBM),那麼您需要查看其股東名冊的構成。持股數量最多的是機構,確切地說約佔公司總股本的61%。換句話說,機構面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.

由於機構業主擁有巨額資源和流動性資產,他們的投資決策往往具有很大的影響力,尤其是對個人投資者。因此,擁有大量機構資金投資於一家公司通常被視爲一種理想的特徵。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of International Business Machines.

下圖是針對國際商業機器公司所有權的不同持股群體放大的圖表。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:IBM Ownership Breakdown June 24th 2024
紐交所:IBM股權結構拆解於2024年6月24日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About International Business Machines?

機構股權持有情況告訴我們有關國際商業機器公司的什麼信息?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in International Business Machines. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at International Business Machines' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

正如您所看到的,機構投資者在國際商業機器公司中佔有相當大的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經考慮過該股,並且他們喜歡它。但就像任何人一樣,他們也可能錯了。一旦多個機構同時改變對一個股票的看法,股價就可能迅速下跌。因此,值得查看下面的國際商業機器公司收益歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:IBM Earnings and Revenue Growth June 24th 2024
紐交所:IBM收益和營收增長情況於2024年6月24日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in International Business Machines. Our data shows that The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 9.6% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 8.2% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 5.9% by the third-largest shareholder.

機構投資者擁有公司50%以上的股份,因此他們可能強有力地影響董事會決策。我們注意到,對於國際商業機器公司,對沖基金沒有實質性的投資。我們的數據顯示,The Vanguard Group, Inc.是最大的股東,佔流通股的9.6%。有關第二大股東持有約8.2%的流通股,第三大股東持有約5.9%的股份。

Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.

我們的研究表明,前25大股東共控制了公司股份的不到一半,這意味着公司的股份廣泛分散,沒有主導股東。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

儘管有道理去研究一家公司的機構所有權數據,但了解分析師的觀點也很有道理,以便知道市場的風向。由於相當多的分析師涵蓋了該股票,因此您可以很容易地研究預測的增長。

Insider Ownership Of International Business Machines

國際商業機器公司內部持股情況

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

內部人員的定義在不同國家可能會稍有不同,但董事會成員始終算入其中。公司管理負責經營業務,但即使首席執行官是董事會成員,他或她也必須對董事會負責。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of International Business Machines Corporation in their own names. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$158m of stock. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們的數據顯示,公司內部人員以自己的名義持有的國際商業機器公司股份不到1%。由於規模巨大,我們不會期望內部人員佔有公司的大部分股份。他們共持有價值1.58億美元的股票。董事會成員擁有股份是好事,但是檢查這些內部人員是否一直在購買股票也是值得的。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 39% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over International Business Machines. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

隨着39%的所有權,以個人投資者爲主的公衆具有對國際商業機器公司的一定影響力。儘管擁有相當大的所有權,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,則這並不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand International Business Machines better, we need to consider many other factors. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for International Business Machines you should be aware of.

考慮到不同群體擁有公司的股份,這一點始終值得思考。但是,要更好地理解國際商業機器公司,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如:我們發現了1個關於國際商業機器公司的警告信號,您應該知道。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論