share_log

Here's Why LGI Homes (NASDAQ:LGIH) Is Weighed Down By Its Debt Load

Here's Why LGI Homes (NASDAQ:LGIH) Is Weighed Down By Its Debt Load

爲什麼lgi homes (納斯達克股票代碼:LGIH) 受到債務負擔的拖累
Simply Wall St ·  06/24 19:15

Some say volatility, rather than debt, is the best way to think about risk as an investor, but Warren Buffett famously said that 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. We can see that LGI Homes, Inc. (NASDAQ:LGIH) does use debt in its business. But should shareholders be worried about its use of debt?

有人說,波動性,而不是債務,是投資者思考風險的最佳方式,但禾倫·巴菲特曾說過一句名言:“波動性遠非風險的代名詞。”當我們思考一家公司的風險有多大時,我們總是喜歡考慮其債務的用途,因爲債務過載可能導致破產。我們可以看到,LGI Homes, Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:LGIH)確實在其業務中使用了債務。但是,股東是否應該擔心其債務的使用?

Why Does Debt Bring Risk?

爲什麼債務會帶來風險?

Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. However, a more common (but still painful) scenario is that it has to raise new equity capital at a low price, thus permanently diluting shareholders. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.

債務可以幫助企業,直到企業難以償還債務,無論是新資本還是自由現金流。在最壞的情況下,如果公司無法向債權人付款,它可能會破產。但是,更常見(但仍然令人痛苦)的情況是,它必須以低廉的價格籌集新的股本,從而永久稀釋股東。當然,債務可以成爲企業的重要工具,尤其是資本密集型企業。當我們考慮公司使用債務時,我們首先將現金和債務放在一起考慮。

What Is LGI Homes's Net Debt?

LGI Homes的淨負債是多少?

You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that as of March 2024 LGI Homes had US$1.38b of debt, an increase on US$1.05b, over one year. However, it also had US$49.0m in cash, and so its net debt is US$1.33b.

你可以點擊下圖查看歷史數字,但它顯示,截至2024年3月,LGI Homes在一年內有13.8億美元的債務,比10.5億美元有所增加。但是,它也有4,900萬美元的現金,因此其淨負債爲13.3億美元。

debt-equity-history-analysis
NasdaqGS:LGIH Debt to Equity History June 24th 2024
NASDAQGS: LGIH 債券與股本比率歷史記錄 2024 年 6 月 24 日

A Look At LGI Homes' Liabilities

看看LGI Homes的負債

Zooming in on the latest balance sheet data, we can see that LGI Homes had liabilities of US$97.9m due within 12 months and liabilities of US$1.56b due beyond that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of US$49.0m as well as receivables valued at US$27.2m due within 12 months. So it has liabilities totalling US$1.58b more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.

放大最新的資產負債表數據,我們可以看到,LGI Homes在12個月內到期的負債爲9,790萬美元,之後到期的負債爲15.6億美元。除這些債務外,它有4,900萬美元的現金以及價值2720萬美元的應收賬款在12個月內到期。因此,它的負債總額比其現金和短期應收賬款的總和多出15.8億美元。

This deficit is considerable relative to its market capitalization of US$2.12b, so it does suggest shareholders should keep an eye on LGI Homes' use of debt. Should its lenders demand that it shore up the balance sheet, shareholders would likely face severe dilution.

相對於其21.2億美元的市值,這一赤字相當可觀,因此這確實表明股東應密切關注LGI Homes對債務的使用。如果其貸款人要求其支撐資產負債表,股東可能會面臨嚴重的稀釋。

We use two main ratios to inform us about debt levels relative to earnings. The first is net debt divided by earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), while the second is how many times its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) covers its interest expense (or its interest cover, for short). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.

我們使用兩個主要比率來告知我們相對於收益的債務水平。第一個是淨負債除以利息、稅項、折舊和攤銷前的收益(EBITDA),第二個是其利息和稅前收益(EBIT)覆蓋其利息支出(或簡稱利息保障)的多少倍。這樣,我們既考慮債務的絕對數量,也考慮爲債務支付的利率。

As it happens LGI Homes has a fairly concerning net debt to EBITDA ratio of 5.7 but very strong interest coverage of 1k. This means that unless the company has access to very cheap debt, that interest expense will likely grow in the future. Importantly, LGI Homes's EBIT fell a jaw-dropping 29% in the last twelve months. If that earnings trend continues then paying off its debt will be about as easy as herding cats on to a roller coaster. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if LGI Homes can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

碰巧的是,LGI Homes的淨負債與息稅折舊攤銷前利潤的比率相當令人擔憂,爲5.7,但利息覆蓋率非常高,爲1k。這意味着,除非公司能夠獲得非常便宜的債務,否則利息支出將來可能會增加。重要的是,LGI Homes的息稅前利潤在過去十二個月中下降了驚人的29%。如果這種盈利趨勢繼續下去,那麼償還債務就像放貓坐過山車一樣容易。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表是顯而易見的起點。但最終,該業務的未來盈利能力將決定LGI Homes能否隨着時間的推移加強其資產負債表。因此,如果你想看看專業人士的想法,你可能會發現這份關於分析師利潤預測的免費報告很有趣。

But our final consideration is also important, because a company cannot pay debt with paper profits; it needs cold hard cash. So it's worth checking how much of that EBIT is backed by free cash flow. Over the last three years, LGI Homes saw substantial negative free cash flow, in total. While that may be a result of expenditure for growth, it does make the debt far more risky.

但是我們最終的考慮因素也很重要,因爲公司無法用紙面利潤來償還債務;它需要冷硬現金。因此,值得檢查一下息稅前利潤中有多少是由自由現金流支持的。在過去的三年中,LGI Homes的自由現金流總額爲負數。儘管這可能是增長支出的結果,但它確實使債務風險大大增加。

Our View

我們的觀點

On the face of it, LGI Homes's conversion of EBIT to free cash flow left us tentative about the stock, and its EBIT growth rate was no more enticing than the one empty restaurant on the busiest night of the year. But on the bright side, its interest cover is a good sign, and makes us more optimistic. We're quite clear that we consider LGI Homes to be really rather risky, as a result of its balance sheet health. So we're almost as wary of this stock as a hungry kitten is about falling into its owner's fish pond: once bitten, twice shy, as they say. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for LGI Homes (1 is significant!) that you should be aware of before investing here.

從表面上看,LGI Homes將息稅前利潤轉換爲自由現金流使我們對該股持初步看法,其息稅前利潤增長率並不比一年中最繁忙的夜晚那家空蕩蕩的餐廳更具吸引力。但好的一面是,它的利息保障是一個好兆頭,也使我們更加樂觀。我們很清楚,由於其資產負債表狀況良好,我們認爲LGI Homes的風險確實相當大。因此,我們對這隻魚的警惕幾乎就像一隻飢餓的小貓要掉進主人的魚池一樣警惕:正如他們所說,一旦被咬傷,兩次害羞。資產負債表顯然是分析債務時需要關注的領域。但歸根結底,每家公司都可以控制資產負債表之外存在的風險。例如,我們發現了 LGI Homes 的 2 個警告標誌(1 個很重要!)在這裏投資之前,您應該注意這一點。

Of course, if you're the type of investor who prefers buying stocks without the burden of debt, then don't hesitate to discover our exclusive list of net cash growth stocks, today.

當然,如果你是那種喜歡在沒有債務負擔的情況下購買股票的投資者,那麼請立即查看我們的獨家淨現金增長股票清單。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team@simplywallst.com

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論