share_log

Institutional Owners May Consider Drastic Measures as Aehr Test Systems' (NASDAQ:AEHR) Recent US$70m Drop Adds to Long-term Losses

Institutional Owners May Consider Drastic Measures as Aehr Test Systems' (NASDAQ:AEHR) Recent US$70m Drop Adds to Long-term Losses

機構投資者可能會考慮採取激烈措施,因爲aehr test systems (納斯達克: AEHR) 最近的7000萬美元的跌幅加劇了其長期虧損。
Simply Wall St ·  06/22 20:58

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Aehr Test Systems' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 18 shareholders
  • Using data from company's past performance alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 機構大量持有的股權意味着Aehr Test Systems的股票價格受到他們的交易行爲的影響很大。
  • 前18位股東持有51%的股份。
  • 通過公司過去的業績數據和股權研究,人們可以更好地評估一家公司的未來表現。

Every investor in Aehr Test Systems (NASDAQ:AEHR) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 68% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

Aehr Test Systems(納斯達克股票代碼:AEHR)的每個投資者都應該知道最強大的股東集團。我們可以看到機構擁有總公司68%的股份,因此如果股價上漲,該集團將獲得最大的收益(或者如果出現下行市場最大的損失)。

As a result, institutional investors endured the highest losses last week after market cap fell by US$70m. This set of investors may especially be concerned about the current loss, which adds to a one-year loss of 73% for shareholders. Often called "market movers", institutions wield significant power in influencing the price dynamics of any stock. As a result, if the downtrend continues, institutions may face pressures to sell Aehr Test Systems, which might have negative implications on individual investors.

因此,當市值下降7000萬美元時,機構投資者在上週承受了最高的損失。這一系列投資者可能特別關注當前的損失,這加劇了股東近一年73%的損失。通常被稱爲“市場動力者”的機構在影響任何股票的價格動態方面擁有重要的影響力。因此,如果下行趨勢持續下去,機構可能面臨出售Aehr Test Systems的壓力,這可能會對個人投資者產生負面影響。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Aehr Test Systems.

讓我們更近距離地觀察一下不同類型的股東對Aehr Test Systems的影響。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqCM:AEHR Ownership Breakdown June 22nd 2024
NasdaqCM:AEHR所有權分解 六月22日,2024

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Aehr Test Systems?

機構股東對Aehr Test Systems的說明是什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Aehr Test Systems. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Aehr Test Systems' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

正如你所看到的,機構投資者在Aehr Test Systems中佔有相當數量的股份。這意味着爲機構工作的分析師們已經查看了這支股票並且他們喜歡它。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能是錯的。如果多個機構同時改變他們對某支股票的看法,你可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得注意的是,在下面查看Aehr Test Systems的盈利歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqCM:AEHR Earnings and Revenue Growth June 22nd 2024
NasdaqCM:AEHR盈利和收入增長 六月22日,2024

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Aehr Test Systems. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 7.3% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 7.0% and 4.2%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. In addition, we found that Gayn Erickson, the CEO has 1.1% of the shares allocated to their name.

投資者應該注意,機構實際擁有公司超過一半的股權,因此他們可以集體行使重要的權力。對Aehr Test Systems而言,對沖基金沒有很多股份。目前,該公司最大的股東是Vanguard Group,Inc.,擁有7.3%的流通股份。同時,第二大和第三大股東分別持有7.0%和4.2%的流通股份。此外,我們發現首席執行官Gayn Erickson擁有分配給他們的股份的1.1%。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 18 shareholders have a combined ownership of 51% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

更詳細地觀察我們的所有權數據表明,前18位股東擁有51%的聯合所有權,意味着沒有單一的股東擁有大多數股份。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.

儘管有必要研究公司的機構持股數據,但研究分析師的情緒也是有道理的,以了解風向。這隻股票有一些分析師的覆蓋,但不多。因此,有提高更多的分析涵蓋面的空間。

Insider Ownership Of Aehr Test Systems

Aehr Test Systems的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

內部人員的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終計數。公司管理層回答董事會,在此應代表股東利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員也在董事會上。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

We can see that insiders own shares in Aehr Test Systems. In their own names, insiders own US$17m worth of stock in the US$309m company. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們可以看到,內部人員擁有Aehr Test Systems的股份。在他們自己的名字下,內部人員擁有這個市值3.09億美元公司價值1700萬美元的股票。這至少說明一些對齊。你可以點擊這裏查看內部人員是否已經買進或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 26% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Aehr Test Systems. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

持有該公司26%的股份的普通公衆,大多數是個人投資者,對Aehr Test Systems具有一定影響力。雖然這個群體不能決定一切,但它肯定對公司的運營產生了實質性影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 4 warning signs for Aehr Test Systems (of which 2 are concerning!) you should know about.

我覺得查看公司的所有權真的很有趣。但是要真正獲得深入的了解,我們需要考慮其他信息,比如風險。每個公司都存在風險,我們已經發現了Aehr Test Systems的4個警告信號(其中2個令人擔憂),你應該知道。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您想發現分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這份有關分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論