share_log

Is Xcel Energy (NASDAQ:XEL) Using Too Much Debt?

Is Xcel Energy (NASDAQ:XEL) Using Too Much Debt?

埃克西爾能源(納斯達克:XEL)是否使用了過多的債務?
Simply Wall St ·  06/21 21:40

Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' It's only natural to consider a company's balance sheet when you examine how risky it is, since debt is often involved when a business collapses. We can see that Xcel Energy Inc. (NASDAQ:XEL) does use debt in its business. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.

禾倫·巴菲特曾經說過,“波動性遠非風險的代名詞。” 當我們評估一個公司的風險程度時,考慮到企業破產時通常涉及債務,因此它的負債表就顯得尤爲重要。 我們可以看到Xcel Energy股份有限公司(納斯達克:XEL)確實在自己的業務中使用了債務,但實際問題是否在於這些債務會使公司變得更加冒險呢。

When Is Debt A Problem?

什麼時候負債才是一個問題?

Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. Of course, plenty of companies use debt to fund growth, without any negative consequences. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.

一般來說,只有在公司無法融資或者用其自有現金流輕易償還債務時,債務才會變成真正的問題。資本主義中必不可少的是‘創造性破壞’的過程,失敗的企業會被銀行家無情地清算。然而,更常見(但同樣昂貴)的情況是公司必須以較低的價格稀釋股東以令債務得到控制。當然,大量公司通過債務來創業,而沒有遭到任何負面後果。當我們考慮公司使用債務的情況時,首先要看到現金和債務。

What Is Xcel Energy's Net Debt?

Xcel Energy 的流動清債能力如何呢?

You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that as of March 2024 Xcel Energy had US$27.4b of debt, an increase on US$24.8b, over one year. And it doesn't have much cash, so its net debt is about the same.

您可以通過下面的圖表點擊查看歷史數據,但可以看到截至2024年3月,Xcel Energy負債總額爲274億美元,較一年前的248億美元增加。且其現金儲備不多,其淨債務總額與前一年相當。

debt-equity-history-analysis
NasdaqGS:XEL Debt to Equity History June 21st 2024
納斯達克 XEL 股權 負債比例 歷史 走勢圖 2024年6月21日

A Look At Xcel Energy's Liabilities

仔細查看最新的資產負債表數據,我們可以看到Xcel Energy有51億美元的負債需要在12個月內還清,425億美元的負債需要在12個月以上還清。與此相抵,其有5.35億美元的現金和20億美元的應收賬款需要在12個月內還清。因此,其負債總額超過現金和短期應收賬款的總和達452億美元。

Zooming in on the latest balance sheet data, we can see that Xcel Energy had liabilities of US$5.21b due within 12 months and liabilities of US$42.5b due beyond that. Offsetting this, it had US$535.0m in cash and US$2.00b in receivables that were due within 12 months. So it has liabilities totalling US$45.2b more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.

負債總額對這家295億美元的公司產生了陰影,就像高大的巨人般籠罩在普通人之上。所以我們會密切關注其負債表,這毫無疑問。畢竟,如果Xcel Energy今天必須償付其債權人,可能需要進行重大的再融資。Xcel Energy股東面臨着高淨債務至EBITDA比率(5.1)和相當薄弱的利息覆蓋面的雙重打擊,因爲EBIT僅是利息費用的2.5倍。這意味着我們認爲它承擔了沉重的債務負擔。幸運的是,Xcel Energy在過去一年中EBIT增長了7.9%,相對於收益而言,緩慢減少了其負債。當分析負債水平時,負債表是顯而易見的起點。但是,未來的收益而不是負債表,更能決定Xcel Energy未來維持健康的負債表的能力。因此,如果您專注於未來,可以查看此免費報告,其中顯示了分析師的利潤預測。

This deficit casts a shadow over the US$29.5b company, like a colossus towering over mere mortals. So we'd watch its balance sheet closely, without a doubt. After all, Xcel Energy would likely require a major re-capitalisation if it had to pay its creditors today.

但我們最終的考慮也很重要,因爲一家公司無法用紙質利潤償還債務。它需要冰冷的現金。因此,邏輯的下一步是查看與實際自由現金流匹配的EBIT佔比。在過去的三年中,Xcel Energy燒掉了大量現金。儘管這可能是由於爲增長而支出的結果,但它使債務風險大大增加。

We use two main ratios to inform us about debt levels relative to earnings. The first is net debt divided by earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), while the second is how many times its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) covers its interest expense (or its interest cover, for short). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.

我們使用兩個主要的比率來衡量債務水平與收益的關係。一個是淨債務除以利息、稅、折舊和攤銷前利潤(EBITDA),另一個是它的利息費用與利息和稅前利潤(EBIT)相比的倍數(或其利息覆蓋率)。這樣,我們考慮了債務的絕對量以及所支付的利率。

Xcel Energy shareholders face the double whammy of a high net debt to EBITDA ratio (5.1), and fairly weak interest coverage, since EBIT is just 2.5 times the interest expense. This means we'd consider it to have a heavy debt load. Fortunately, Xcel Energy grew its EBIT by 7.9% in the last year, slowly shrinking its debt relative to earnings. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Xcel Energy's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

在Xcel Energy的總負債水平上,我們有點猶豫,而且其將EBIT轉換爲自由現金流的比例也不比一年中最繁忙的那家空蕩蕩的餐廳更吸引人。但是好的方面是,它的EBIT增長率很不錯,這使我們更加樂觀。我們還應該注意到,像Xcel Energy這樣的公用事業公司通常會無障礙地使用債務。綜合考慮所有上述因素,Xcel Energy的負債過高。這種風險對某些人來說是可以的,但對我們來說顯然是不可取的。在分析負債水平時,負債表是顯而易見的起點。但並非所有的投資風險都在負債表中。因此,我們識別出了Xcel Energy的2個警告信號(其中1個可能很嚴重),您應該了解。

But our final consideration is also important, because a company cannot pay debt with paper profits; it needs cold hard cash. So the logical step is to look at the proportion of that EBIT that is matched by actual free cash flow. During the last three years, Xcel Energy burned a lot of cash. While that may be a result of expenditure for growth, it does make the debt far more risky.

但我們最終的考慮也很重要,因爲一家公司無法用紙質利潤償還債務。它需要冰冷的現金。因此,邏輯的下一步是查看與實際自由現金流匹配的EBIT佔比。在過去的三年中,Xcel Energy燒掉了大量現金。儘管這可能是由於爲增長而支出的結果,但它使債務風險大大增加。

Our View

我們的觀點

On the face of it, Xcel Energy's level of total liabilities left us tentative about the stock, and its conversion of EBIT to free cash flow was no more enticing than the one empty restaurant on the busiest night of the year. But on the bright side, its EBIT growth rate is a good sign, and makes us more optimistic. We should also note that Electric Utilities industry companies like Xcel Energy commonly do use debt without problems. Taking into account all the aforementioned factors, it looks like Xcel Energy has too much debt. That sort of riskiness is ok for some, but it certainly doesn't float our boat. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for Xcel Energy (1 is potentially serious) you should be aware of.

從總負債水平來看,Xcel Energy的股票讓我們感到猶豫,而它將EBIT轉化爲自由現金流的能力卻和一年中最繁忙的那個空蕩蕩的餐館一樣不令人喜歡。但是好消息是,它的EBIT增長率很高,這讓我們更加樂觀。我們還應該注意到,像Xcel Energy這樣的公用股公司通常可以自由地使用債務。綜合考慮上述所有因素,看起來Xcel Energy的負債過高。某些風險對於類似公司來說是可以接受的,但這顯然不符合我們的投資風格。在分析負債水平時,負債表很重要,但並非所有投資風險都在負債表中。因此,我們識別了2個Xcel Energy的警告信號(其中1個可能很嚴重),您應該予以關注。

At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.

總的來說,專注於沒有淨債務的公司往往更好。您可以訪問我們的特別列表,其中包含這些公司(所有這些公司都有盈利增長的記錄)。這是免費的。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論