share_log

Altria Group, Inc. (NYSE:MO) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 62% of the Company

Altria Group, Inc. (NYSE:MO) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 62% of the Company

機構持有者持有公司的62%,Altria Group,Inc.(NYSE:MO)備受青睞。
Simply Wall St ·  06/20 20:46

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Altria Group's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 44% ownership
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 由於機構持有大量的Altria Group股票,因此其股價可能會受到其交易決策的影響。
  • 共有25名投資者擁有該公司的多數股份,佔股44%。
  • 內部人員最近一直在賣出。

A look at the shareholders of Altria Group, Inc. (NYSE:MO) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 62% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

看一眼Altria Group,Inc.(紐交所:MO)的股東,就能知道哪個團體最具影響力。機構持有公司最多的股份,達62% 。換句話說,該團體從對公司的投資中可獲得最多(或損失最多)的利益。

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

考慮到機構持有的巨額資金和研究能力,機構持股往往具有很大的影響力,特別是對於個人投資者。因此,機構投資者投資公司的大量資金通常是對其未來的巨大信任。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Altria Group, beginning with the chart below.

先從下面的圖表開始,深入研究Altria Group的每種所有者類型。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:MO Ownership Breakdown June 20th 2024
NYSE: MO所有權分解圖2024年6月20日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Altria Group?

機構所有權告訴我們關於Altria Group的什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Altria Group. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Altria Group, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

正如您所看到的,機構投資者在Altria Group中持有相當多的股份。這意味着,爲這些機構工作的分析師們已經研究了這支股票,並且認爲它值得投資。但就像其他人一樣,他們也可能是錯的。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售股票,往往會看到股價大幅下跌。因此,值得檢查Altria Group過去的收益軌跡(如下所示)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:MO Earnings and Revenue Growth June 20th 2024
NYSE: MO收入和收益增長2024年6月20日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Altria Group. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 9.3% of shares outstanding. With 7.4% and 5.1% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and Capital Research and Management Company are the second and third largest shareholders.

由於機構投資者擁有超過一半的已發行股票,董事會可能會注意到他們的偏好。對於Altria Group而言,對沖基金持有的股票並不多。目前,The Vanguard Group,Inc.是該公司的最大股東,佔已發行股份的9.3% 。BlackRock,Inc.和Capital Research and Management Company分別擁有已發行股份的7.4%和5.1%,是第二和第三大股東。

A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.

對我們的所有權數據進行更深入的研究表明,前25名股東的持股總額不到註冊表的一半,表明有一個小股東的大群體,其中沒有單個股東擁有多數股份。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以增加您的研究價值,但研究分析師建議是了解股票預期表現的更深入的做法。相當多的分析師都對該股票進行了研究,因此您可以輕鬆地查看預測增長。

Insider Ownership Of Altria Group

Altria Group的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Altria Group, Inc. in their own names. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$57m of stock. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們的數據表明,內部人員直接持有Altria Group,Inc.不到1%的股份。考慮到公司規模如此之大,我們不會期望內部人員持有大量股份。他們共擁有5700萬美元的股票。看到至少有一些內部所有權總是好的,但可能值得檢查這些內部人員是否一直在賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 38% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Altria Group. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

擁有38%股份的大衆,主要是由個人投資者組成,對Altria Group產生了一定的影響力。儘管這個群體不能打造公司的戰略,但確實對公司的經營有真正的影響力。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Altria Group better, we need to consider many other factors. Be aware that Altria Group is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...

考慮到擁有股份的不同群體總是有益的,但要更好地了解Altria Group,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。請注意,Altria Group在我們的投資分析中顯示了1個警告標誌,您需要了解...

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論