share_log

In the Wake of Sleep Number Corporation's (NASDAQ:SNBR) Latest US$53m Market Cap Drop, Institutional Owners May Be Forced to Take Severe Actions

In the Wake of Sleep Number Corporation's (NASDAQ:SNBR) Latest US$53m Market Cap Drop, Institutional Owners May Be Forced to Take Severe Actions

在Sleep Number Corporation (納斯達克股票代碼:SNBR) 最新市值下跌5,300萬美元的影響下,機構持股者可能被迫採取嚴厲行動。
Simply Wall St ·  06/20 20:52

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Sleep Number implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 12 shareholders
  • Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 各機構持有的大量Sleep Number意味着它們對公司的股價具有重大影響
  • 51% 的業務由前 12 名股東持有
  • 使用分析師預測的數據以及所有權研究,可以更好地評估公司的未來表現

A look at the shareholders of Sleep Number Corporation (NASDAQ:SNBR) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 74% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

看看Sleep Number Corporation(納斯達克股票代碼:SNBR)的股東可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。而持有最大份額的集團是擁有74%所有權的機構。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

And so it follows that institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to US$254m last week after a 17% drop in the share price. The recent loss, which adds to a one-year loss of 48% for stockholders, may not sit well with this group of investors. Institutions or "liquidity providers" control large sums of money and therefore, these types of investors usually have a lot of influence over stock price movements. As a result, if the downtrend continues, institutions may face pressures to sell Sleep Number, which might have negative implications on individual investors.

因此,上週該公司的市值在股價下跌17%後跌至2.54億美元,因此機構投資者是受影響最大的群體。最近的虧損加上股東一年的虧損48%,可能不適合這群投資者。機構或 “流動性提供者” 控制着大量資金,因此,這些類型的投資者通常對股價走勢有很大的影響力。因此,如果下跌趨勢持續下去,機構可能會面臨出售Sleep Number的壓力,這可能會對個人投資者產生負面影響。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Sleep Number.

在下圖中,我們放大了 Sleep Number 的不同所有權組。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:SNBR Ownership Breakdown June 20th 2024
納斯達克證券交易所:SNBR 所有權明細 2024 年 6 月 20 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Sleep Number?

關於睡眠人數,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

We can see that Sleep Number does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Sleep Number's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我們可以看到,Sleep Number確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司很大一部分股票。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 “擁擠交易” 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到Sleep Number的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事中總是有更多內容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:SNBR Earnings and Revenue Growth June 20th 2024
納斯達克股票代碼:SNBR 收益和收入增長 2024 年 6 月 20 日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. It would appear that 8.6% of Sleep Number shares are controlled by hedge funds. That catches my attention because hedge funds sometimes try to influence management, or bring about changes that will create near term value for shareholders. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Stadium Capital Management, LLC with 8.6% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 7.0% and 5.6% of the stock. Additionally, the company's CEO Shelly Ibach directly holds 1.3% of the total shares outstanding.

機構投資者擁有公司50%以上的股份,因此加在一起可能會對董事會的決策產生重大影響。看來Sleep Number股票中有8.6%是由對沖基金控制的。這引起了我的注意,因爲對沖基金有時會試圖影響管理層,或者帶來能夠爲股東創造短期價值的變革。從我們的數據來看,我們可以看到最大的股東是體育場資本管理有限責任公司,其已發行股份佔8.6%。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約7.0%和5.6%的股份。此外,該公司首席執行官雪莉·伊巴赫直接持有已發行股份總額的1.3%。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 12 shareholders have a combined ownership of 51% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

仔細觀察我們的所有權數據就會發現,前12名股東的合併所有權爲51%,這意味着沒有一個股東擁有多數股東。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Sleep Number

睡眠號碼的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。公司管理層對董事會的回答,董事會應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也在董事會中。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Sleep Number Corporation. As individuals, the insiders collectively own US$12m worth of the US$254m company. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們最新的數據表明,內部人士擁有Sleep Number Corporation的部分股份。作爲個人,內部人士共同擁有這家價值2.54億美元的公司的價值1200萬美元。很高興看到內部人士進行一些投資,但可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 13% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Sleep Number. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

擁有13%所有權的公衆,主要由個人投資者組成,對睡眠數字有一定程度的影響力。儘管這個群體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運作方式產生真正的影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. To that end, you should learn about the 3 warning signs we've spotted with Sleep Number (including 2 which don't sit too well with us) .

儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。爲此,你應該了解我們在睡眠數字中發現的 3 個警告信號(包括 2 個對我們來說不太合適)。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

歸根結底,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問這份關於公司分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team@simplywallst.com

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論