share_log

With 64% Institutional Ownership, Verizon Communications Inc. (NYSE:VZ) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns

With 64% Institutional Ownership, Verizon Communications Inc. (NYSE:VZ) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns

憑藉64%的機構持股,紐交所通信-半導體公司(NYSE:VZ)是巨頭們的最愛。
Simply Wall St ·  06/20 19:29

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Verizon Communications' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • 38% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 機構持股比例顯著較高,意味着Verizon通信-半導體股票價格對他們的交易舉動十分敏感。
  • 前25名股東持有該業務的38%。
  • 分析師預測以及所有者數據可以給我們提供有關業務前景的強烈想法。

If you want to know who really controls Verizon Communications Inc. (NYSE:VZ), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 64% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果您想知道真正控制Verizon通信-半導體(紐交所:verizon)的是誰,那麼您將不得不查看其股權登記簿構成。 我們可以看到,機構持有公司的大部分股份,擁有64%的所有權。 換句話說,這個集團將從他們對該公司的投資中獲得最多(或獲得最少)。

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

考慮到機構持有的巨額資金和研究能力,機構持股往往具有很大的影響力,特別是對於個人投資者。因此,機構投資者投資公司的大量資金通常是對其未來的巨大信任。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Verizon Communications.

下圖是對Verizon通信-半導體不同所有權集團的詳細劃分。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:VZ Ownership Breakdown June 20th 2024
紐交所:VZ股權結構拆分June 20th 2024

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Verizon Communications?

機構持股告訴我們什麼關於Verizon通信-半導體?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

We can see that Verizon Communications does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Verizon Communications' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我們可以看到,Verizon通信-半導體確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司的很大一部分股份。這可以表明該公司在投資社區中具有一定的信譽度。 然而,最好謹慎依賴機構投資者所帶來的所謂證明。他們有時也會犯錯。如果多個機構同時改變其對股票的看法,您可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得看一下Verizon通信-半導體下面的收入歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:VZ Earnings and Revenue Growth June 20th 2024
紐交所:VZ收入增長情況June 20th 2024

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Verizon Communications. Our data shows that The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 8.3% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 8.1% and 4.4% of the stock.

投資者應注意,機構實際擁有超過一半的公司股份,因此它們可以共同行使重大權力。對於Verizon通信-半導體,對沖基金並不擁有很多股份。我們的數據顯示,The Vanguard Group,Inc.是最大的股東,擁有8.3%的股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約8.1%和4.4%的股份。

A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.

對我們的所有權數據進行更深入的研究表明,前25名股東的持股總額不到註冊表的一半,表明有一個小股東的大群體,其中沒有單個股東擁有多數股份。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目的。由於有相當數量的分析師涵蓋這支股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會有所幫助。

Insider Ownership Of Verizon Communications

Verizon通信-半導體內部持股情況

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

內部人員的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終計數。公司管理層回答董事會,在此應代表股東利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員也在董事會上。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our information suggests that Verizon Communications Inc. insiders own under 1% of the company. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$47m worth of shares (at current prices). In this sort of situation, it can be more interesting to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的信息顯示,Verizon通信-半導體的內部持股比例少於1%。由於它是一家非常大的公司,因此看到內部人持有公司的大部分股份令人驚訝。儘管他們的持股不到1%,但我們可以看到董事會成員共計擁有價值4700萬美元的股票(以當前價格計算)。在這種情況下,更有趣的是看看這些內部人是否一直在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 36% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Verizon Communications. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

隨着36%的持有權,以個人投資者爲主的普通公衆對Verizon通信-半導體產生了一定的影響。儘管此類所有權可能不足以使政策決定朝他們方向傾斜,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 4 warning signs for Verizon Communications that you should be aware of before investing here.

我非常感興趣研究公司的股權所有權。但是,要真正獲得洞察力,我們需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們已經發現了Verizon通信-半導體的4個警告信號,您在投資之前應該了解這些信號。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論