share_log

Freeport-McMoRan Inc.'s (NYSE:FCX) Institutional Investors Lost 3.3% Last Week but Have Benefitted From Longer-term Gains

Freeport-McMoRan Inc.'s (NYSE:FCX) Institutional Investors Lost 3.3% Last Week but Have Benefitted From Longer-term Gains

上週麥克莫蘭銅金公司(紐交所:FCX)機構投資者損失了3.3%,但在長期收益方面受益
Simply Wall St ·  06/20 03:11

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Freeport-McMoRan's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • A total of 19 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 機構持股比率高意味着麥克莫蘭銅金的股價對他們的交易行爲非常敏感。
  • 共有19個投資者擁有該公司50%的所有權。
  • 近期內有內部人士出售股票

Every investor in Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (NYSE:FCX) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 84% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

Freeport-McMoRan股東中,每一位投資者都應該了解最有權勢的股東群體。在該公司中,持有股份最多的是機構,佔公司股份的84%左右。換句話說,該群體面臨的上行潛力(或下行風險)最大。

Losing money on investments is something no shareholder enjoys, least of all institutional investors who saw their holdings value drop by 3.3% last week. However, the 23% one-year return to shareholders may have helped lessen their pain. But they would probably be wary of future losses.

投資損失是沒有哪個股東喜歡的,尤其是機構投資者上週看到其持股價值下降了3.3%。然而,1年23%的股東回報可能有助於減輕他們的痛苦。但他們可能會對未來的損失感到警惕。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Freeport-McMoRan.

以下圖表中,我們將關注Freeport-McMoRan的不同股權所有者群體。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:FCX Ownership Breakdown June 19th 2024
2024年6月19日NYSE:FCX持股比例分佈

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Freeport-McMoRan?

機構投資者的持股情況對我們關於麥克莫蘭銅金的理解有所啓示。正如您所看到的,機構投資者在麥克莫蘭銅金中擁有相當數量的股份。這可能表明,該公司在投資社區中具有一定的可信度。然而,最好還是謹慎地依賴機構投資者所帶來的所謂的驗證。他們也會犯錯誤。如果多個機構同時改變對某隻股票的看法,您可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,查看下面的Freeport-McMoRan的收益歷史是值得的。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Freeport-McMoRan. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Freeport-McMoRan's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

機構投資者掌握了公司50%以上的股份,因此他們可以強烈影響董事會的決策。我們注意到對沖基金對麥克莫蘭銅金沒有顯著的投資。通過查看我們的數據,我們可以看到最大的股東是持有該公司8.4%流通股份的The Vanguard Group, Inc.。爲了提供背景,第二大股東持有約7.6%的流通股份,第三大股東持有該公司6.8%的股份。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:FCX Earnings and Revenue Growth June 19th 2024
2024年6月19日NYSE:FCX收益和營業收入增長

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Freeport-McMoRan. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc. with 8.4% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 7.6% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 6.8% by the third-largest shareholder.

機構投資者擁有該公司50%以上的股份,因此他們可以共同影響董事會的決策。我們注意到對沖基金對麥克莫蘭銅金沒有顯著的投資。通過查看我們的數據,我們可以看到最大的股東是持有該公司8.4%流通股份的The Vanguard Group, Inc.。爲了提供背景,第二大股東持有約7.6%的流通股份,第三大股東持有該公司6.8%的股份。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 19 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

我們對於股權數據的更深入分析顯示,前19大股東共計持有公司50%的股份,這意味着沒有單一股東佔多數。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

儘管研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以深入了解股票的預期表現。有許多分析師對這支股票進行了覆蓋,因此了解他們的預測可能值得一試。

Insider Ownership Of Freeport-McMoRan

Freeport-McMoRan的內部持股

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Freeport-McMoRan Inc.. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$350m worth of shares. In this sort of situation, it can be more interesting to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們最近的數據表明,內部人員持有Freeport-McMoRan Inc.不到1%的股份。由於它是一家大公司,我們只希望內部人員擁有它很小的一部分股份。但值得注意的是,他們擁有價值3.5億美元的股票。在這種情況下,看看這些內部人員是否一直在買賣股票更加有趣。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 15% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

普通公衆,包括散戶投資者,擁有該公司15%的股份,因此他們不能被輕易忽視。雖然這種擁有量可能不足以在他們的利益方面影響政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - Freeport-McMoRan has 2 warning signs we think you should be aware of.

雖然考慮到擁有公司的不同群體是非常值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。以風險爲例,麥克莫蘭銅金有2個警告信號,我們認爲您應該意識到這一點。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您想發現分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這份有關分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論