share_log

With 81% Institutional Ownership, Reliance, Inc. (NYSE:RS) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns

With 81% Institutional Ownership, Reliance, Inc. (NYSE:RS) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns

憑藉81%的機構持股,Reliance, Inc.(紐交所:RS)是大佬們中的最愛。
Simply Wall St ·  06/19 21:59

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Reliance's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 17 shareholders
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 高機構所有權意味着信實的股價對其交易行爲很敏感
  • 50% 的業務由前 17 名股東持有
  • 業內人士最近賣出了

A look at the shareholders of Reliance, Inc. (NYSE:RS) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 81% to be precise, is institutions. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

看看信實公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:RS)的股東可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。持有該公司股份最多的集團是機構,準確地說約爲81%。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果出現低迷,則損失最大)。

Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.

由於機構可以獲得大量資金,因此他們的市場走勢往往會受到散戶或個人投資者的嚴格審查。因此,將大量機構資金投資於公司通常被視爲理想的特徵。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Reliance, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究信實的每種所有者。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:RS Ownership Breakdown June 19th 2024
紐約證券交易所:RS 所有權明細 2024 年 6 月 19 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Reliance?

關於信實,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。

We can see that Reliance does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Reliance, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到,信實確實有機構投資者;他們持有該公司很大一部分股票。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得查看信實過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:RS Earnings and Revenue Growth June 19th 2024
紐約證券交易所:RS 收益和收入增長 2024 年 6 月 19 日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Reliance. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 12%. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 11% of common stock, and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. holds about 4.5% of the company stock.

由於機構投資者擁有已發行股票的一半以上,董事會可能必須注意他們的偏好。對沖基金在信實的股票不多。該公司的最大股東是Vanguard Group, Inc.,其所有權爲12%。貝萊德公司是第二大股東,擁有11%的普通股,道富環球顧問公司持有該公司約4.5%的股份。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 17 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

仔細觀察我們的所有權數據就會發現,前17名股東的合併所有權爲50%,這意味着沒有一個單一股東擁有多數股東。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。有不少分析師報道了該股,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。

Insider Ownership Of Reliance

信實的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。公司管理層對董事會的回答,董事會應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也在董事會中。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

Our information suggests that Reliance, Inc. insiders own under 1% of the company. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$103m of stock. Arguably recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的信息表明,信實公司的內部人士擁有該公司不到1%的股份。由於規模如此之大,我們預計內部人士不會擁有很大一部分股票。他們共擁有1.03億美元的股票。可以說,最近的買入和賣出同樣值得考慮。你可以點擊這裏查看內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 18% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司18%的股份,因此不容忽視。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for Reliance (1 is concerning!) that you should be aware of before investing here.

儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。例如,我們發現了 Reliance 的 2 個警告信號(1 個令人擔憂!)在這裏投資之前,您應該注意這一點。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一樣,你可能需要考慮這家公司是會成長還是會萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份免費報告,其中顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team@simplywallst.com

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論