share_log

Retail Investors Who Have a Significant Stake Must Be Disappointed Along With Institutions After PLAYSTUDIOS, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:MYPS) Market Cap Dropped by US$51m

Retail Investors Who Have a Significant Stake Must Be Disappointed Along With Institutions After PLAYSTUDIOS, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:MYPS) Market Cap Dropped by US$51m

納斯達克:MYPS市值下降5,100萬美元后,持有重要股份的散戶和機構都可能感到失望。
Simply Wall St ·  06/19 21:35

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • PLAYSTUDIOS' significant retail investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • 47% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
  • Insiders own 16% of PLAYSTUDIOS
  • PLAYSTUDIOS擁有大量散戶投資者的所有權,這表明關鍵決策受到廣大公衆股東的影響
  • 47% 的業務由前 25 名股東持有
  • 內部人士擁有PLAYSTUDIOS16%的股份

If you want to know who really controls PLAYSTUDIOS, Inc. (NASDAQ:MYPS), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 47% to be precise, is retail investors. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果你想知道誰真正控制着PLAYSTUDIOS, Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:MYPS),那麼你必須看看其股票登記處的構成。持有該公司股份最多的集團是散戶投資者,準確地說約爲47%。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。

While institutions who own 36% came under pressure after market cap dropped to US$268m last week,retail investors took the most losses.

儘管上週市值跌至2.68億美元后,持有36%的機構承受了壓力,但散戶投資者遭受的損失最大。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about PLAYSTUDIOS.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於PLAYSTUDIOS的哪些信息。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGM:MYPS Ownership Breakdown June 19th 2024
NasdaqGM:MYPS 所有權明細 2024 年 6 月 19 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About PLAYSTUDIOS?

關於PLAYSTUDIOS,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in PLAYSTUDIOS. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of PLAYSTUDIOS, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

如您所見,機構投資者在PLAYSTUDIOS中擁有相當數量的股份。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得檢查一下PLAYSTUDIOS過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGM:MYPS Earnings and Revenue Growth June 19th 2024
NasdaqGM: MYPS 收益和收入增長 2024 年 6 月 19 日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in PLAYSTUDIOS. With a 14% stake, CEO Andrew Pascal is the largest shareholder. With 4.9% and 3.9% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and Icon Management Associates LLC are the second and third largest shareholders.

對沖基金在PLAYSTUDIOS中持有的股票不多。首席執行官安德魯·帕斯卡爾持有14%的股份,是最大股東。貝萊德公司和ICON Management Associates LLC分別擁有4.9%和3.9%的已發行股份,是第二和第三大股東。

A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.

深入研究我們的所有權數據表明,前25名股東總共持有不到登記冊的一半,這表明一大批小股東沒有單一股東佔多數。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of PLAYSTUDIOS

PLAYSTUDIOS 的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of PLAYSTUDIOS, Inc.. Insiders own US$43m worth of shares in the US$268m company. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的最新數據表明,內部人士擁有PLAYSTUDIOS, Inc.合理比例的股份。內部人士擁有這家價值2.68億美元的公司價值4300萬美元的股份。我們可以說這表明了與股東的一致性,但值得注意的是,該公司仍然很小;一些內部人士可能已經創立了該公司。你可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 47% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司47%的股份,因此不容忽視。雖然這個團體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運營方式產生真正的影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.

我覺得看看究竟是誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們也需要考慮其他信息。

I always like to check for a history of revenue growth. You can too, by accessing this free chart of historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.

我一直喜歡查看收入增長的歷史。您也可以,通過訪問此詳細圖表中的這張免費的歷史收入和收益圖表。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一樣,你可能需要考慮這家公司是會成長還是會萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份免費報告,其中顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team@simplywallst.com

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論