share_log

Both Individual Investors Who Control a Good Portion of ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. (NYSE:CHPT) Along With Institutions Must Be Dismayed After Last Week's 16% Decrease

Both Individual Investors Who Control a Good Portion of ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. (NYSE:CHPT) Along With Institutions Must Be Dismayed After Last Week's 16% Decrease

紐交所(CHPT)的大量個人投資者和機構在上週16%的下跌後必須感到沮喪。
Simply Wall St ·  06/19 20:47

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significant control over ChargePoint Holdings by individual investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • The top 25 shareholders own 39% of the company
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 個人投資者對ChargePoint Holdings具有重要的控制力,這意味着普通公衆可以更有權力影響管理和治理相關決策。
  • 前二十五大股東佔公司的39%。
  • 近期內有內部人士出售股票

To get a sense of who is truly in control of ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. (NYSE:CHPT), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 52% to be precise, is individual investors. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

要了解ChargePoint Holdings(紐交所:CHPT)真正的控制者是誰,重要的是要了解公司的所有權結構。持有該公司最多股票的是個人投資者,精確地說是約52%。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該組將獲得最大的受益(如果出現下降,則損失最大)。

While the holdings of individual investors took a hit after last week's 16% price drop, institutions with their 40% holdings also suffered.

儘管上週的16%價格下跌導致個人投資者的持股減少,但擁有40%持股的機構也遭受了損失。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about ChargePoint Holdings.

讓我們仔細看看各種股東類型對ChargePoint Holdings的意義。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:CHPT Ownership Breakdown June 19th 2024
紐交所:CHPT 2024年6月19日的股權結構分配

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About ChargePoint Holdings?

機構投資者在ChargePoint Holdings中有相當大的股份,這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經審視了該股票並且他們看好它。但是和其他人一樣,他們可能犯錯。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖賣出一支股票,則經常會看到股價大幅下跌。因此,值得檢查ChargePoint Holdings的過去收益軌跡(如下)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in ChargePoint Holdings. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of ChargePoint Holdings, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

紐交所:CHPT 2024年6月19日的盈利和營業收入增長

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:CHPT Earnings and Revenue Growth June 19th 2024
我們注意到,對於ChargePoint Holdings,對沖基金沒有重要的投資。目前,The Vanguard Group公司是最大的股東,持有該公司8.6%的股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股東分別持有該股票的約6.3%和4.1%。

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in ChargePoint Holdings. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 8.6% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 6.3% and 4.1% of the stock.

ChargePoint Holdings的內部股東也持有該公司的股份。在自己的名字下,內部股東持有價值1000萬美元的公司股票,該公司總市值爲7.02億美元。一些人會說,這表明股東和董事會的利益一致。但是,有必要檢查這些內部股東是否一直在進行賣出。

A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.

對我們的所有權數據進行更深入的研究表明,前25名股東的持股總額不到註冊表的一半,表明有一個小股東的大群體,其中沒有單個股東擁有多數股份。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

儘管研究公司的機構持股可以增加您的研究價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。有相當數量的分析師關注該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體觀點可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of ChargePoint Holdings

包括散戶投資者在內,普通公衆擁有ChargePoint Holdings的52%。這種所有權規模使得普通公衆的投資者具有一定的集體力量。他們可以影響執行薪酬、紅利政策和擬議中的業務收購等決策。

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

內部人員的定義在不同國家可能會稍有不同,但董事會成員始終算入其中。公司管理負責經營業務,但即使首席執行官是董事會成員,他或她也必須對董事會負責。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

We can report that insiders do own shares in ChargePoint Holdings, Inc.. In their own names, insiders own US$10m worth of stock in the US$702m company. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

擁有6.3%的私募股權投資公司可以在塑造以價值創造爲重點的企業戰略方面扮演角色。有些人可能會喜歡這樣,因爲私募股權有時候是激進分子,會讓管理層負責任。但有時私募股權也會以將公司上市的方式出售。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public -- including retail investors -- own 52% of ChargePoint Holdings. This size of ownership gives investors from the general public some collective power. They can and probably do influence decisions on executive compensation, dividend policies and proposed business acquisitions.

投資公司的持有群體告訴我們關於公司可能面臨的各種風險更多的透視,對比於公司的持有群體至關重要。因此,我們應該認真考慮。例如,考慮到投資風險永遠存在,考慮到資料中已經識別出5個警告信號(不應忽視至少1個),並了解這些警告信號應該包括在您的投資過程中。

Private Equity Ownership

股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。

With an ownership of 6.3%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

ChargePoint Holdings中股權投資私募基金的持有量爲6.3%,這使得投資人可以發揮一定的集體力量來塑造企業戰略,以創造價值。一些人可能會喜歡這種情況,因爲私募股權有時候是激進分子,會讓管理層負責任。但有時私募股權也會以將公司上市的方式出售。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 5 warning signs with ChargePoint Holdings (at least 1 which shouldn't be ignored) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

雖然了解擁有一家公司的不同集體的重要性,但其他因素更重要。考慮到投資風險永遠存在,了解這些警告信號應該包括在您的投資過程中,其中可能有5個警告信號(不應忽視至少1個)。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論