share_log

With 77% Ownership of the Shares, Abbott Laboratories (NYSE:ABT) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

With 77% Ownership of the Shares, Abbott Laboratories (NYSE:ABT) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

由機構持有者主導,Abbott Laboratories (紐交所:ABT) 擁有77%的股權。
Simply Wall St ·  06/19 19:30

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Abbott Laboratories' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • The top 25 shareholders own 48% of the company
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 較高的機構持股意味着雅培的股價對其交易行爲非常敏感。
  • 該公司前 25 名股東擁有該公司的 48%。
  • 最近由內部人士出售。

If you want to know who really controls Abbott Laboratories (NYSE:ABT), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 77% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果您想了解真正控制雅培(紐交所ABT)的人,請看看其股權登記簿的構成。我們可以看到,機構擁有公司的絕大部分股份,佔股東總數的77%。換句話說,機構集團從其對該公司的投資中獲得或失去的利益最大。

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

因爲機構所有者擁有龐大的資源和流動性,他們的投資決策往往帶有很大的分量,尤其是對於個人投資者來說。因此,機構投資在一家公司中的大量資金通常被視爲一個積極因素。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Abbott Laboratories.

讓我們仔細研究一下不同類型的股東給我們關於雅培的哪些信息。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:ABT Ownership Breakdown June 19th 2024
紐交所ABT股權結構於2024年6月19日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Abbott Laboratories?

機構持股對雅培有什麼影響?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

Abbott Laboratories already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Abbott Laboratories, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

雅培已經有一些機構投資於該公司。確實,它們持有公司中的相當大比例,這表明專業投資者對該公司的信用度較高。但我們不能單憑這一事實來判斷,因爲機構有時也會像其他人一樣進行糟糕的投資。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售股票,那麼往往會看到股價大幅下跌。因此,有必要檢查雅培的過去收益軌跡(如下)。當然,還要記住考慮其他因素。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:ABT Earnings and Revenue Growth June 19th 2024
紐交所ABT收益和營業收入增長於2024年6月19日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Abbott Laboratories is not owned by hedge funds. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 9.5% of shares outstanding. Capital Research and Management Company is the second largest shareholder owning 9.0% of common stock, and BlackRock, Inc. holds about 7.6% of the company stock.

投資者應該注意到,機構實際上擁有公司的一半以上股份,因此他們可以集體施加重要影響力。雅培不是由對沖基金擁有。目前,最大的股東是慧博集團,持有公司的9.5%流通股。資本研究和管理公司是第二大股東,持有9.0%的普通股,而貝萊德公司持有約7.6%的股份。

On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.

經過我們的所有權數據研究,我們發現前25位股東共同擁有不到50%的股份,表明沒有任何個人擁有多數利益。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

儘管有道理去研究一家公司的機構所有權數據,但了解分析師的觀點也很有道理,以便知道市場的風向。由於相當多的分析師涵蓋了該股票,因此您可以很容易地研究預測的增長。

Insider Ownership Of Abbott Laboratories

雅培的內部股權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

雖然“內部人士”的明確定義具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員,也要向董事會負責。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Abbott Laboratories. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$949m worth of shares (at current prices). Arguably recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我們最近的數據顯示,內部股東擁有不到1%的雅培股份。這是一家非常大的公司,因此我們不會驚訝於看到內部股東持有公司的相當小一部分股份。儘管他們的持股量不到1%,但我們可以看到,董事會成員共持有價值9.49億美元的股份(按當前價格計算)。毋庸置疑,最近的購買和銷售同樣值得考慮。您可以單擊此處查看內部人員是否一直在購買或銷售該公司股票。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 23% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Abbott Laboratories. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

擁有23%股份的普通公衆,主要由個人投資者組成,對雅培具有一定的影響力。雖然這種所有權相當可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For instance, we've identified 1 warning sign for Abbott Laboratories that you should be aware of.

雖然考慮到擁有一家公司的不同群體是非常重要的,但還有其他一些更重要的因素。例如,我們已經確認雅培存在一種警示信號,您應該了解一下。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論