share_log

Institutional Owners May Take Dramatic Actions as Ovid Therapeutics Inc.'s (NASDAQ:OVID) Recent 75% Drop Adds to One-year Losses

Institutional Owners May Take Dramatic Actions as Ovid Therapeutics Inc.'s (NASDAQ:OVID) Recent 75% Drop Adds to One-year Losses

隨着奧維德治療公司(納斯達克:OVID)最近股價下跌75%加劇了一年來的虧損,機構投資者可能會採取重大行動。
Simply Wall St ·  06/18 21:00

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Ovid Therapeutics implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • A total of 8 investors have a majority stake in the company with 53% ownership
  • Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 機構對Ovid Therapeutics的大量持有表明他們對該公司的股價有重要影響力
  • 共有8位投資者持有該公司的大部分股權,擁有53%的所有權。
  • 所有權研究和分析師預測數據有助於更好地了解股票市場的機會。

A look at the shareholders of Ovid Therapeutics Inc. (NASDAQ:OVID) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 34% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

觀察Ovid Therapeutics Inc. (NASDAQ:OVID)的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最有實力。我們可以看到機構擁有公司34%的股權。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將獲得最大的收益(或在股市走低時承受最大的損失)。

And institutional investors endured the highest losses after the company's share price fell by 75% last week. The recent loss, which adds to a one-year loss of 79% for stockholders, may not sit well with this group of investors. Often called "market movers", institutions wield significant power in influencing the price dynamics of any stock. As a result, if the decline continues, institutional investors may be pressured to sell Ovid Therapeutics which might hurt individual investors.

公司股票上週下跌了75%,機構投資者遭受了最高的損失。最近的損失加劇了股東一年的損失達79%,這可能對這群投資者不利。通常被稱爲“市場操縱者”的機構在影響任何股票的價格動態方面具有重要的影響力。因此,如果股票繼續下跌,機構投資者可能面臨割肉自救的壓力,這可能會傷害個人投資者。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Ovid Therapeutics, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入了解Ovid Therapeutics的每種持有者類型,並從下面的表格開始。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:OVID Ownership Breakdown June 18th 2024
NasdaqGS:OVID所有權分佈2024年6月18日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Ovid Therapeutics?

機構所有權告訴我們關於Ovid Therapeutics的什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

We can see that Ovid Therapeutics does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Ovid Therapeutics' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我們可以看到Ovid Therapeutics確實擁有機構投資者;他們掌握了公司的相當一部分股份。這表明專業投資者對公司有一定的信任度。但僅憑這一事實是不可靠的,因爲機構有時也會犯錯誤,就像其他人一樣。當多個機構擁有一種股票時,存在它們進行“擁擠交易”的風險。當這樣的交易出現問題時,多個方可能會競相快速拋售股票。這種風險在沒有成長曆史的公司中更高。您可以查看Ovid Therapeutics的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住,還有更多的故事。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:OVID Earnings and Revenue Growth June 18th 2024
NasdaqGS:OVID盈利與營收增長2024年6月18日

It looks like hedge funds own 27% of Ovid Therapeutics shares. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. The company's largest shareholder is Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, with ownership of 11%. With 8.6% and 7.5% of the shares outstanding respectively, EcoR1 Capital, LLC and Rubric Capital Management LP are the second and third largest shareholders. Additionally, the company's CEO Jeremy Levin directly holds 5.1% of the total shares outstanding.

看起來對Ovid Therapeutics股票持有27%的是對沖基金。這很有趣,因爲對沖基金可能非常積極和活躍。許多對沖基金尋找中期催化劑,以推高股價。公司最大的股東是武田製藥有限公司,持股11%。持有公司股票總數8.6%和7.5%的是EcoR1 Capital,LLC和Rubric Capital Management LP,是第二和第三大的股東。此外,公司首席執行官Jeremy Levin直接持有公司總股數的5.1%。

We did some more digging and found that 8 of the top shareholders account for roughly 53% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我們深挖了一下,發現前8名股東持有公司註冊資本的約53%,這意味着除大股東外,還有一些小股東,從而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

儘管有道理去研究一家公司的機構所有權數據,但了解分析師的觀點也很有道理,以便知道市場的風向。由於相當多的分析師涵蓋了該股票,因此您可以很容易地研究預測的增長。

Insider Ownership Of Ovid Therapeutics

Ovid Therapeutics的內部持股情況

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

We can see that insiders own shares in Ovid Therapeutics Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$233m, and insiders have US$12m worth of shares, in their own names. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們可以看到內部人員持有Ovid Therapeutics股票。它的市值僅爲2.33億美元,內部人員以自己的名義持有價值1200萬美元的股票。看到內部人員有一些投資是好事,但可能值得檢查一下這些內部人員是否一直在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 24% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

包括散戶投資者在內的普通公衆擁有該公司24%的股份,因此不容忽視。雖然這個群體不能必然掌控局面,但它肯定會對公司經營方式產生真正的影響。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有權

Public companies currently own 11% of Ovid Therapeutics stock. This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further.

公共公司目前擁有Ovid Therapeutics股票的11%。這可能是戰略上的利益,兩家公司可能有相關的業務利益。這可能是它們進行解除合併的原因。這種持股可能值得進一步調查。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - Ovid Therapeutics has 3 warning signs (and 2 which can't be ignored) we think you should know about.

儘管值得考慮不同的股東,但還有其他更重要的因素。例如風險——Ovid Therapeutics有3個警示標誌(還有2個不能被忽視),我們認爲您應該知道。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論