share_log

Institutional Owners May Ignore ARS Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:SPRY) Recent US$64m Market Cap Decline as Longer-term Profits Stay in the Green

Institutional Owners May Ignore ARS Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:SPRY) Recent US$64m Market Cap Decline as Longer-term Profits Stay in the Green

機構投資者可能會忽略ARS Pharmaceuticals,Inc.(納斯達克:SPRY)最近6400萬美元市值的下降,因爲長期利潤保持良好。
Simply Wall St ·  06/18 20:32

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, ARS Pharmaceuticals' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • 53% of the business is held by the top 7 shareholders
  • 21% of ARS Pharmaceuticals is held by insiders
  • 考慮機構持有該股票的大部分股權,ARS Pharmaceuticals公司的股價可能容易受到其交易決策的影響。
  • 前七大股東持有該業務的53%。
  • 21%的ARS Pharmaceuticals股份由內部人持有。

A look at the shareholders of ARS Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ:SPRY) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 30% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

看看ARS Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ: SPRY)的股東可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。持有最多股權的是機構,擁有30%的股份。換句話說,該機構可能從公司投資中獲得最高的回報(或承受最高的風險)。

Losing money on investments is something no shareholder enjoys, least of all institutional investors who saw their holdings value drop by 7.3% last week. However, the 35% one-year return to shareholders may have helped lessen their pain. But they would probably be wary of future losses.

沒有股東喜歡在投資中虧錢,特別是機構投資者,上週看到其持有的股票貶值了7.3%。 然而,股東獲得的35%一年回報率可能有助於減輕他們的痛苦。但他們可能會對未來的損失保持謹慎。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of ARS Pharmaceuticals, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入探討ARS Pharmaceuticals的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGM:SPRY Ownership Breakdown June 18th 2024
NasdaqGM: SPRY股權拆分2024年6月18日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About ARS Pharmaceuticals?

機構持有權向我們透露了哪些關於ARS Pharmaceuticals的信息?我們可以看到ARS Pharmaceuticals確實有機構投資者;並且他們擁有公司的很大一部分股票。這表明專業投資者對該公司頗有信心。但我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時像其他人一樣會投資失敗。當多個機構持有一隻股票時,就會存在他們正在進行的交易。如果這些交易出現問題,多個方面可能會迅速售出股票。在沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。下面可以查看ARS Pharmaceuticals的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住還有其他因素。

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

We can see that ARS Pharmaceuticals does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see ARS Pharmaceuticals' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我們可以看到ARS Pharmaceuticals確實吸引了機構投資者;他們持有公司的很大一部分股票。這表明專業投資者對該公司頗有信心。但我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時像其他人一樣會投資失敗。當多個機構持有一隻股票時,就會存在他們正在進行的交易。如果這些交易出現問題,多個方面可能會迅速售出股票。在沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。下面可以查看ARS Pharmaceuticals的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住還有其他因素。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGM:SPRY Earnings and Revenue Growth June 18th 2024
NasdaqGM: SPRY業績及營收增長2024年6月18日

It looks like hedge funds own 11% of ARS Pharmaceuticals shares. That worth noting, since hedge funds are often quite active investors, who may try to influence management. Many want to see value creation (and a higher share price) in the short term or medium term. The company's largest shareholder is Deerfield Management Company, L.P. Series C, with ownership of 11%. RA Capital Management, L.P. is the second largest shareholder owning 11% of common stock, and OrbiMed Advisors LLC holds about 9.5% of the company stock. Additionally, the company's CEO Richard Lowenthal directly holds 6.0% of the total shares outstanding.

看起來對ARS Pharmaceuticals股票的擁有量超過一半的是前7大股東,這表明較小股東的利益在某種程度上可以平衡較大股東的利益。對於公司而言,最大的股東是Deerfield Management Company,佔11%的所有權。 RA Capital Management,L.P.是第二大股東,擁有11%的普通股,OrbiMed Advisors LLC擁有大約9.5%的公司股票。此外,該公司的CEO Richard Lowenthal直接持有6.0%的總股份。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 7 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

經過進一步檢查,我們發現該公司超過一半的股權由前7大股東持有,這意味着較小股東的利益在一定程度上可以平衡較大股東的利益。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

研究機構持股情況是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以取得相同的結果。相當多的分析師涵蓋了這筆股票,所以你可以很容易地調查預測增長。

Insider Ownership Of ARS Pharmaceuticals

ARS Pharmaceuticals的內部人士持有大量股份。其市值只有8.39億美元,內部人士自己持有價值1.8億美元的股份。看到內部人員如此投資是很好的,值得關注的是,如果這些內部人士最近一直在購買股票,那也許值得檢查一下。

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of ARS Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$839m, and insiders have US$180m worth of shares in their own names. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.

私人股權公司持有ARS Pharmaceuticals的21%股份。這表明他們可以對重要政策決策產生影響。一些人可能會喜歡這個,因爲私人資本有時是持有管理層負責的激進分子。但是,有時私募股權是在把公司上市後出售。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 12% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

普通公衆,包括散戶投資者,在該公司中擁有12%的股份,因此不能輕易忽略他們。雖然這種所有權規模相當可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致,則可能不足以改變公司政策。

Private Equity Ownership

股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。

Private equity firms hold a 21% stake in ARS Pharmaceuticals. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

看起來私人公司擁有ARS Pharmaceuticals股票的3.4%。這可能值得深入研究。如果相關方,例如內部人士,對其中一傢俬人公司有興趣,那麼應在年度報告中披露。私人公司也可能對該公司有戰略興趣。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

It seems that Private Companies own 3.4%, of the ARS Pharmaceuticals stock. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

雖然考慮到擁有一家公司的不同團體很有價值,但還有其他更重要的因素。請注意,ARS Pharmaceuticals在我們的投資分析中顯示了2個警告信號,其中1個使我們感到有些不舒服。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Be aware that ARS Pharmaceuticals is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 1 of those makes us a bit uncomfortable...

雖然考慮到擁有一家公司的不同團體很有價值,但還有其他更重要的因素。請注意,ARS Pharmaceuticals在我們的投資分析中顯示了2個警告信號,其中1個使我們感到有些不舒服。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論