share_log

Institutional Investors May Adopt Severe Steps After Selective Insurance Group, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:SIGI) Latest 4.1% Drop Adds to a Year Losses

Institutional Investors May Adopt Severe Steps After Selective Insurance Group, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:SIGI) Latest 4.1% Drop Adds to a Year Losses

在選擇性保險集團(納斯達克:SIGI)最新的4.1%下跌增加了一年的虧損後,機構投資者可能採取嚴厲措施
Simply Wall St ·  06/17 19:59

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Selective Insurance Group implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • A total of 10 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 機構在選擇性保險集團的大量持股意味着它們對該公司的股價具有重大影響
  • 共有10名投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲50%
  • 分析師的預測以及所有權數據可以使人們對企業前景有深刻的了解

A look at the shareholders of Selective Insurance Group, Inc. (NASDAQ:SIGI) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 84% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

看看選擇性保險集團有限公司(納斯達克股票代碼:SIGI)的股東可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。而持有最大份額的集團是擁有84%所有權的機構。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果出現低迷,則損失最大)。

And so it follows that institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to US$5.5b last week after a 4.1% drop in the share price. The recent loss, which adds to a one-year loss of 7.0% for stockholders, may not sit well with this group of investors. Also referred to as "smart money", institutions have a lot of sway over how a stock's price moves. As a result, if the decline continues, institutional investors may be pressured to sell Selective Insurance Group which might hurt individual investors.

因此,上週該公司的市值在股價下跌4.1%後跌至55億美元,因此機構投資者是受影響最大的群體。最近的虧損加上股東一年的虧損7.0%,可能不適合這群投資者。也被稱爲 “智能貨幣”,機構對股票價格的走勢有很大的影響力。因此,如果繼續下跌,機構投資者可能會被迫出售選擇性保險集團,這可能會傷害個人投資者。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Selective Insurance Group.

在下圖中,我們放大了選擇性保險集團的不同所有權組。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:SIGI Ownership Breakdown June 17th 2024
納斯達克股票代碼:SIGI 所有權明細 2024 年 6 月 17 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Selective Insurance Group?

關於選擇性保險集團,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。

Selective Insurance Group already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Selective Insurance Group's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

選擇性保險集團已經在股票登記處設立了機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。如果多家機構同時改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看選擇性保險集團的收益記錄。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:SIGI Earnings and Revenue Growth June 17th 2024
納斯達克股票代碼:SIGI 收益和收入增長 2024 年 6 月 17 日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Selective Insurance Group is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc., with ownership of 13%. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 11% of common stock, and FMR LLC holds about 5.5% of the company stock.

由於機構投資者擁有已發行股票的一半以上,董事會可能必須注意他們的偏好。選擇性保險集團不歸對沖基金所有。該公司的最大股東是貝萊德公司,所有權爲13%。Vanguard Group, Inc.是第二大股東,擁有11%的普通股,FMR LLC持有該公司約5.5%的股份。

We also observed that the top 10 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

我們還觀察到,前十名股東佔股票登記冊的一半以上,少數規模較小的股東可以在一定程度上平衡大股東的利益。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。有不少分析師報道了該股,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。

Insider Ownership Of Selective Insurance Group

選擇性保險集團的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行委員會成員的情況並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Selective Insurance Group, Inc.. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$82m. Most would see this as a real positive. It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們的最新數據顯示,內部人士擁有選擇性保險集團的部分股份。內部人士持有價值8200萬美元的大量股份。大多數人會認爲這是一個真正的積極因素。很高興看到內部人士的這種投資水平。你可以在這裏查看這些內部人士最近是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 14% stake in Selective Insurance Group. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有選擇性保險集團14%的股份。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.

我覺得看看究竟是誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們也需要考慮其他信息。

I always like to check for a history of revenue growth. You can too, by accessing this free chart of historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.

我一直喜歡查看收入增長的歷史。您也可以,通過訪問此詳細圖表中的這張免費的歷史收入和收益圖表。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一樣,你可能需要考慮這家公司是會成長還是會萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份免費報告,其中顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team@simplywallst.com

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論