share_log

With 88% Ownership, Waste Connections, Inc. (NYSE:WCN) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing

With 88% Ownership, Waste Connections, Inc. (NYSE:WCN) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing

由於擁有88%的股份,垃圾處理公司Waste Connections, Inc. (紐交所:WCN)擁有強大的機構支持
Simply Wall St ·  06/17 19:30

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Waste Connections' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • The top 18 shareholders own 51% of the company
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 機構持有量極高意味着Waste Connections的股價受到其交易行爲的影響
  • 前18大股東擁有該公司51%的股份。
  • 近期內有內部人士出售股票

A look at the shareholders of Waste Connections, Inc. (NYSE:WCN) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 88% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

研究Waste Connections, Inc. (NYSE:WCN)的股東可以告訴我們哪個團體最有權力。持有最多股份的團體是機構,佔有88%的所有基金類型。換句話說,這個團體面臨最大的漲跌幅風險。

Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.

由於機構具有龐大的資本量,他們的市場動作往往會受到零售或個人投資者的高度關注。因此,在一家公司中擁有大量機構投資往往被視爲一個理想的特徵。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Waste Connections.

下面的圖表詳細介紹了Waste Connections的不同所有權團體。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:WCN Ownership Breakdown June 17th 2024
NYSE:WCN所有權結構明細(截至2024年6月17日)

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Waste Connections?

機構持有情況對Waste Connections產生了什麼影響?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

We can see that Waste Connections does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Waste Connections' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我們可以看到Waste Connections確實有機構投資者,他們持有其公司的相當一部分股份。這可能表明公司在投資社區中具有一定的信譽度。但是,仍需警惕過分依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們也有時犯錯。當多個機構擁有某個股票時,總會存在他們在 “擁擠交易”中的風險。當這種交易出現問題時,可能有多個方面會競相拋售股票。這種風險在缺乏增長曆史的公司中更高。您可以在下面看到Waste Connections的歷史收益和營業收入,但要記住這裏總有更多的故事。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:WCN Earnings and Revenue Growth June 17th 2024
NYSE:WCN營收增長情況(截至2024年6月17日)

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Waste Connections is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 11% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 7.3% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 4.3% by the third-largest shareholder.

投資者應該注意到,機構實際上擁有超過公司一半的股份,因此他們可以集體行使重大的影響力。Waste Connections不是被對沖基金所擁有的。我們的數據顯示,The Vanguard Group, Inc.是最大的股東,持有11%的流通股。作爲參考,第二大股東持有約7.3%的流通股,第三大股東持有4.3%的流通股。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 18 have the combined ownership of 51% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

經過一些更深入的挖掘,我們發現,前18名股東在公司中擁有51%的股份,這意味着沒有單一的股東對公司具有重大控制權。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然仔細研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師對該股票的看法也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在跟蹤該股票,因此了解他們對於未來發展的總體看法可能會有所幫助。

Insider Ownership Of Waste Connections

Waste Connections的內部持股情況

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

內部人員的定義在不同國家可能會稍有不同,但董事會成員始終算入其中。公司管理負責經營業務,但即使首席執行官是董事會成員,他或她也必須對董事會負責。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Waste Connections, Inc. in their own names. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$116m of stock. Arguably recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的數據表明,內部人員名下持有Waste Connections, Inc.的股份不到1%。因爲公司規模較大,我們不會期望內部人員擁有大量股份。他們共計持有1.16億美元的股份。值得注意的是,最近的買賣行爲同樣值得考慮。您可以點此查看內部人員最近是否有買賣行爲。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 11% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Waste Connections. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

擁有11%股份的普通公衆,主要包括個人投資者,可以在Waste Connections中發揮一定的影響力。雖然這個團體不能決定所有事情,但肯定可以對公司的運營產生實質性的影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for Waste Connections you should know about.

我非常有興趣看誰真正擁有一家公司。但是,要獲得深入的了解,我們需要考慮其他信息。例如,要考慮風險。每個公司都有風險,我們發現了Waste Connections的一個警告信號,您應該知道。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您想發現分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這份有關分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論