share_log

Painful Week for Retail Investors Invested in Plug Power Inc. (NASDAQ:PLUG) After 6.9% Drop, Institutions Also Suffered Losses

Painful Week for Retail Investors Invested in Plug Power Inc. (NASDAQ:PLUG) After 6.9% Drop, Institutions Also Suffered Losses

納斯達克上Plug Power Inc.(NASDAQ:PLUG)的零售投資者在這周遭受了痛苦的一週,因爲其股價下跌了6.9%,同時機構也遭受了損失。
Simply Wall St ·  06/16 21:53

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Plug Power's significant retail investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • The top 25 shareholders own 39% of the company
  • Institutional ownership in Plug Power is 41%
  • 普拉格能源的大量零售投資者擁有權表明,關鍵決策受到來自更廣大公衆的股東的影響。
  • 前二十五大股東佔公司的39%。
  • 普拉格能源的機構持股爲41%。

Every investor in Plug Power Inc. (NASDAQ:PLUG) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are retail investors with 50% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

每位普拉格能源股票(納斯達克:PLUG)的投資者都應該意識到最強大的股東群體。持有最多的是擁有50%所有權的零售投資者。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該團體將獲得最大的收益(或者如果出現下跌,則損失最大)。

While institutions, who own 41% shares weren't spared from last week's US$149m market cap drop, retail investors as a group suffered the maximum losses

雖然機構持股者擁有41%的股份,但他們也沒有從上週價值1.49億美元的市值下降中倖免,而零售投資者則作爲一個整體承受了最大的損失。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Plug Power.

下面的圖表中,我們放大了普拉格能源的不同所有者群體。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqCM:PLUG Ownership Breakdown June 16th 2024
NasdaqCM:PLUG所有權結構分佈圖(2024年6月16日)

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Plug Power?

普拉格能源的機構持股告訴我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Plug Power. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Plug Power's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

如你所見,機構投資者在普拉格能源中持有相當數量的股份。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定的信用度。然而,最好不要過多依賴機構投資者所謂的認可。他們有時也會犯錯誤。如果多家機構同時改變了對一隻股票的看法,你可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,查看下面的普拉格能源盈利歷史記錄是值得的。當然,未來才是真正有意義的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqCM:PLUG Earnings and Revenue Growth June 16th 2024
NasdaqCM:PLUG盈利和營業收入增長圖(2024年6月16日)

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Plug Power. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc. with 7.4% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 7.4% and 6.5%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

我們注意到,對普拉格能源的投資並不意味着對沖基金有重大投資。根據我們的數據,最大的股東是The Vanguard Group, Inc.,持有7.4%的流通股。與此同時,第二大和第三大股東分別持有流通股的7.4%和6.5%。

A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.

對我們的所有權數據進行更深入的研究表明,前25名股東的持股總額不到註冊表的一半,表明有一個小股東的大群體,其中沒有單個股東擁有多數股份。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目的。由於有相當數量的分析師涵蓋這支股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會有所幫助。

Insider Ownership Of Plug Power

普拉格能源的內部持股情況

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,在管轄範圍之間會有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理擔任執行董事會成員並非不尋常,特別是如果他們是創始人或CEO。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Plug Power Inc. in their own names. We do note, however, it is possible insiders have an indirect interest through a private company or other corporate structure. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own US$17m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. Arguably, recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的數據表明,內部人員名下持有普拉格能源股票的比例不到1%。但我們注意到,內部人士可能通過私人公司或其他公司結構間接持有一些股份。要記住,這是一家大公司,內部人士持有價值1700萬美元的股份。絕對價值可能比比例份額更重要。值得注意的是,最近的買賣同樣值得考慮。你可以點擊這裏查看內部人士是否在買賣。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a substantial 50% stake in Plug Power, suggesting it is a fairly popular stock. With this amount of ownership, retail investors can collectively play a role in decisions that affect shareholder returns, such as dividend policies and the appointment of directors. They can also exercise the power to vote on acquisitions or mergers that may not improve profitability.

普拉格能源的大量股東是公衆,通常是個人投資者,佔公司股份的50%,這表明它是一隻相當受歡迎的股票。憑藉這種所有權,零售投資者可以共同發揮影響股東回報的決策作用,比如分紅政策和董事的任命。他們還可以行使投票權,投票支持可能不會提高盈利能力的收購或合併。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 7.4%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

我們的數據顯示,私人公司持有該公司股份的7.4%。有必要更深入地了解這一點。如果相關方,比如內部人員,擁有其中一傢俬人公司的利益,那應該在年度報告中披露。私人公司也可能對公司有戰略利益。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - Plug Power has 4 warning signs (and 1 which is significant) we think you should know about.

我非常樂意看一家公司的所有人是誰。但爲了真正獲得洞見,我們還需要考慮其他信息。比如風險-普拉格能源有4個警告標誌(其中1個具有重大意義),我們認爲你應該了解。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論