share_log

We Think Quest Diagnostics (NYSE:DGX) Can Stay On Top Of Its Debt

We Think Quest Diagnostics (NYSE:DGX) Can Stay On Top Of Its Debt

我們認爲奎斯特診療(紐交所:DGX)可以控制好其債務。
Simply Wall St ·  06/16 21:04

The external fund manager backed by Berkshire Hathaway's Charlie Munger, Li Lu, makes no bones about it when he says 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. We can see that Quest Diagnostics Incorporated (NYSE:DGX) does use debt in its business. But should shareholders be worried about its use of debt?

伯克希爾哈撒韋公司的股東之一Charlie Munger支持的外部基金經理李錄說:“最大的投資風險不是價格波動,而是你會不會遭受永久性的資本損失。” 當我們考慮一家公司的風險性時,我們總是喜歡看它的債務利用率,因爲負債過重會導致破產。 我們可以看到Quest Diagnostics Incorporated (NYSE:DGX)在業務中使用了債務。 但是股東們是否應該擔心它的債務使用?

When Is Debt A Problem?

什麼時候負債才是一個問題?

Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. If things get really bad, the lenders can take control of the business. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. Of course, the upside of debt is that it often represents cheap capital, especially when it replaces dilution in a company with the ability to reinvest at high rates of return. The first thing to do when considering how much debt a business uses is to look at its cash and debt together.

債務可以幫助企業,直到企業開始無法付清其債務,不管是通過新的資金還是自由現金流。如果情況真的不好,放貸人可以奪取企業的控制權。然而,更常見(但仍然昂貴)的情況是一家公司必須以低廉的股票價格稀釋股東,以控制債務。當然,債務的好處在於它通常代表着廉價的資本,特別是當它代替某個公司能夠以高回報率重新投資的稀釋時。考慮企業使用多少債務的第一件事是看看其現金和債務的情況。

What Is Quest Diagnostics's Debt?

Quest Diagnostics的債務是多少?

The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that at March 2024 Quest Diagnostics had debt of US$4.71b, up from US$3.98b in one year. However, it also had US$474.0m in cash, and so its net debt is US$4.24b.

下面的圖片顯示,截至2024年3月,Quest Diagnostics的債務爲47.1億美元,比一年前的39.8億美元增加。 然而,它也擁有4.74億美元的現金,因此其淨債務爲42.4億美元。

debt-equity-history-analysis
NYSE:DGX Debt to Equity History June 16th 2024
NYSE:DGX的債權與股權歷史

A Look At Quest Diagnostics' Liabilities

了解Quest Diagnostics的負債情況

Zooming in on the latest balance sheet data, we can see that Quest Diagnostics had liabilities of US$2.30b due within 12 months and liabilities of US$5.11b due beyond that. Offsetting this, it had US$474.0m in cash and US$1.32b in receivables that were due within 12 months. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$5.61b.

放大最新的資產負債表數據,我們可以看到Quest Diagnostics負債中有23億美元要在12個月內到期,超過5.11億美元要在12個月後到期。相對而言,它有4.74億美元的現金和13.2億美元的應收賬款即將在12個月內到期。因此,它的負債超過了現金和(近期)應收賬款的總和56.1億美元。

While this might seem like a lot, it is not so bad since Quest Diagnostics has a huge market capitalization of US$15.3b, and so it could probably strengthen its balance sheet by raising capital if it needed to. But it's clear that we should definitely closely examine whether it can manage its debt without dilution.

雖然這聽起來很多,但這並不是很糟糕,因爲Quest Diagnostics市值巨大,達到153億美元,因此如果需要,它可能會通過籌集資本來加強其資產負債表。但很明顯,我們絕對要仔細檢查它能否在不稀釋股東權益的情況下管理其債務。

We use two main ratios to inform us about debt levels relative to earnings. The first is net debt divided by earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), while the second is how many times its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) covers its interest expense (or its interest cover, for short). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).

我們使用兩個主要比率來分析債務與收益之間的關係。第一個比率是淨債務與利息、稅、折舊和攤銷前利潤(EBITDA)的比率,第二個比率是其利潤前利潤和稅(EBIT)覆蓋利息支出的次數(或其利息覆蓋比率)。這種方法的優點在於我們考慮到了債務的絕對數量(通過淨債務與EBITDA的比率),以及與這些債務相關的實際利息支出(通過其利息覆蓋比率)。

With a debt to EBITDA ratio of 2.4, Quest Diagnostics uses debt artfully but responsibly. And the fact that its trailing twelve months of EBIT was 8.3 times its interest expenses harmonizes with that theme. Notably Quest Diagnostics's EBIT was pretty flat over the last year. We would prefer to see some earnings growth, because that always helps diminish debt. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Quest Diagnostics can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

Quest Diagnostics的債務/息稅折舊攤銷前利潤比爲2.4,使用債務藝術地負責任。事實上,過去12個月的息稅前利潤爲其利息支出的8.3倍,與負責的主題相吻合。顯然,Quest Diagnostics的息稅前利潤過去一年基本持平。我們更喜歡看到一些盈利增長,因爲這有助於減少債務。分析債務水平時,資產負債表是開始的明顯位置。但最終企業未來的盈利能力將決定Quest Diagnostics能否長期加強其資產負債表。因此,如果您想看看專業人士的看法,您可能會發現這份免費的分析師盈利預測報告很有趣。

Finally, a company can only pay off debt with cold hard cash, not accounting profits. So it's worth checking how much of that EBIT is backed by free cash flow. Over the most recent three years, Quest Diagnostics recorded free cash flow worth 69% of its EBIT, which is around normal, given free cash flow excludes interest and tax. This cold hard cash means it can reduce its debt when it wants to.

最後,一家公司只能用冷硬的現金而不是會計利潤來償還債務。因此,檢查有多少EBIT是由自由現金流支持的是值得的。在過去的三年中,Quest Diagnostics的自由現金流價值相當於其EBIT的69%,這在自由現金流不包括利息和稅收的情況下是正常的。這些冷硬的現金意味着它可以在需要時減少債務。

Our View

我們的觀點

Quest Diagnostics's conversion of EBIT to free cash flow was a real positive on this analysis, as was its interest cover. Having said that, its net debt to EBITDA somewhat sensitizes us to potential future risks to the balance sheet. It's also worth noting that Quest Diagnostics is in the Healthcare industry, which is often considered to be quite defensive. Considering this range of data points, we think Quest Diagnostics is in a good position to manage its debt levels. But a word of caution: we think debt levels are high enough to justify ongoing monitoring. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for Quest Diagnostics that you should be aware of before investing here.

Quest Diagnostics的EBIT轉爲自由現金流對分析結果來說是一個真正的正面因素,它的利息覆蓋也是如此。雖然如此,它的淨債務/息稅折舊攤銷前利潤比有點敏感,可能會影響其資產負債表的未來風險。還值得注意的是,Quest Diagnostics屬於醫療保健行業,這通常被認爲是相當防禦性的行業。考慮到這些數據點,我們認爲Quest Diagnostics的債務水平處於良好的管理地位。但是還有一個警告語:我們認爲債務水平高於持續監控的水平。分析債務水平時,資產負債表是開始的明顯位置。但投資風險並不都存在於資產負債表中,相差很遠。例如,我們在此發現了一個Quest Diagnostics的投資預警信號,您在投資前應該注意。

Of course, if you're the type of investor who prefers buying stocks without the burden of debt, then don't hesitate to discover our exclusive list of net cash growth stocks, today.

當然,如果您是那種喜歡購買沒有負債負擔的股票的投資者,則今天就可以發現我們的獨家淨現金增長股清單。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論