share_log

Ardmore Shipping Corporation's (NYSE:ASC) Institutional Investors Lost 5.8% Last Week but Have Benefitted From Longer-term Gains

Ardmore Shipping Corporation's (NYSE:ASC) Institutional Investors Lost 5.8% Last Week but Have Benefitted From Longer-term Gains

Ardmore Shipping 公司 (紐交所: ASC) 機構投資者上週虧損了 5.8%,但從長期收益獲得了利益。
Simply Wall St ·  06/15 20:50

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Ardmore Shipping's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • A total of 13 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 考慮到機構持有大量股票,Ardmore Shipping的股價在他們的交易決策下可能容易受到衝擊。
  • 共有13位投資者持有該公司51%的所有權。
  • 通過分析師預測數據和所有權研究,您可以更好地評估公司未來的業績。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Ardmore Shipping Corporation (NYSE:ASC), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 67% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

爲了了解誰真正掌控Ardmore Shipping Corporation(NYSE:ASC),理解業務的所有權結構至關重要。而持有最大股份的是擁有67%所有權的機構。也就是說,如果股票上漲(或下跌)該機構將獲得最多的利益(或承擔最大的損失)。

Losing money on investments is something no shareholder enjoys, least of all institutional investors who saw their holdings value drop by 5.8% last week. Still, the 73% one-year gains may have helped mitigate their overall losses. They should, however, be mindful of further losses in the future.

沒有股東會喜歡在投資上虧損,特別是機構投資者上週看到其持有價值下降了5.8%,更是不能忍受。儘管如此,過去一年73%的收益或有助於緩解其總體損失。但他們應該警惕未來的進一步損失。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Ardmore Shipping.

在下圖中,我們可以看到不同的Ardmore Shipping所有權組。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:ASC Ownership Breakdown June 15th 2024
NYSE:ASC所有權分佈2024年6月15日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Ardmore Shipping?

機構投資者對Ardmore Shipping的持股量告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Ardmore Shipping. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Ardmore Shipping's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

正如您所看到的,機構投資者持有Ardmore Shipping的相當數量的股份。這表明專業投資者之間的可信度。但我們不能僅僅依賴這個事實,因爲機構有時會做錯誤的投資,就像每個人一樣。當多個機構擁有某支股票時,總會存在它們處於“擁擠交易”的風險中。當這種交易出現問題時,多方可能會競相大量拋售股票。在沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更大。您可以查看Ardmore Shipping下面的歷史收益和營收,但請記住還有更多的故事。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:ASC Earnings and Revenue Growth June 15th 2024
NYSE:ASC收益和營收增長2024年6月15日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Ardmore Shipping is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is Dimensional Fund Advisors LP, with ownership of 6.6%. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 6.0% and 5.5% of the stock.

機構投資者持有該公司超過50%的股份,因此他們可能能夠強烈影響董事會決策。Ardmore Shipping不是由對沖基金擁有的。該公司最大的股東是Dimensional Fund Advisors LP,其擁有6.6%的所有權。相比之下,第二大和第三大股東持有的股票大約爲6.0%和5.5%。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 13 shareholders have a combined ownership of 51% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

對我們的所有權數據的進一步研究表明,前13大股東擁有51%的股份,這意味着沒有單一股東擁有多數股份。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期性能的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以實現同樣的效果。很多分析師都在關注該股票,看看他們的預測值得不值得。

Insider Ownership Of Ardmore Shipping

Ardmore Shipping的內部股權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

雖然內部人士的精確定義可能是主觀的,幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。管理層最終向董事會負責。但是,如果他們是創始人或CEO,經理成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

We can see that insiders own shares in Ardmore Shipping Corporation. As individuals, the insiders collectively own US$42m worth of the US$897m company. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們可以看到內部人員擁有Ardmore Shipping Corporation的股票。作爲個人,內部人員共同擁有價值4200萬美元的價值8.97億美元的公司股票。有人會說,這表明股東和董事會之間的利益一致。但值得檢查的是這些內部人員是否一直在拋售股票。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 18% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Ardmore Shipping. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

擁有18%所有權的普通公衆,其中大部分是個人投資者,對Ardmore Shipping有一定的影響力。雖然這種所有權規模相當大,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致,可能還不足以改變公司政策。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 10%, of the company's shares. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

我們的數據表明,私營企業持有該公司10%的股份。私營企業可能是關聯方。有時內部人員通過私營企業的持股而不是以個人身份擁有對公共公司的利益。雖然很難獲得任何廣泛的結論,但值得注意的是需要進一步研究。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for Ardmore Shipping you should be aware of, and 1 of them is a bit concerning.

我覺得看看公司的真正所有者是非常有趣的。但爲了獲得真正的洞察力,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如我們已經發現了Ardmore Shipping的2個警示信號,您應該注意一下,其中1個有些令人擔憂。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論