share_log

Globe Life Inc. (NYSE:GL) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 87%

Globe Life Inc. (NYSE:GL) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 87%

環球人壽保險公司(紐交所:GL)是機構投資者的最愛,他們持有其87%的股份。
Simply Wall St ·  06/15 00:50

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Globe Life's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • A total of 16 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Recent purchases by insiders
  • 機構持有的股權比例較高意味着Globe Life公司的股價對其交易行爲非常敏感。
  • 總共有16家投資者擁有該公司的大部分股權,佔50%的所有權。
  • 最近有內部人員購買。

Every investor in Globe Life Inc. (NYSE:GL) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 87% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

紐交所(NYSE:GL)的每個Globe Life Inc.投資者都應該了解最強大的股東群體。由於機構持有87%的股份,因此在該公司中擁有最大的股份。換言之,該集團的投資將獲得(或失去)最多的利潤。

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

因爲機構所有者擁有龐大的資源和流動性,他們的投資決策往往帶有很大的分量,尤其是對於個人投資者來說。因此,機構投資在一家公司中的大量資金通常被視爲一個積極因素。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Globe Life.

在下面的圖表中,我們對Globe Life的不同所有權組進行了詳細的分析。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:GL Ownership Breakdown June 14th 2024
NYSE:GL所有權佔比情況於2024年6月14日。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Globe Life?

機構持股說明Globe Life的情況。

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

We can see that Globe Life does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Globe Life's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我們可以看到Globe Life確實具有機構投資者,他們持有公司的一部分股票。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師們查看了這支股票,他們對此股票的看法非常好。但是與其他股民一樣,他們也可能是錯的。當多個機構擁有一支股票時,總會存在他們在進行'擁擠交易'的風險。當這種交易出現問題時,多方會競相快速賣出股票。在一個沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更大。您可以查看Globe Life的歷史收益和營業收入數據,但請記住,故事遠未結束。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:GL Earnings and Revenue Growth June 14th 2024
NYSE:GL營收和收入增長於2024年6月14日。

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Globe Life is not owned by hedge funds. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 12% of shares outstanding. With 7.7% and 4.9% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and Wellington Management Group LLP are the second and third largest shareholders.

投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有公司的超過一半股權,因此他們可以集體行使重大影響力。Globe Life不是由對沖基金所有的。目前,持股量最大的是The Vanguard Group,Inc.,佔有12%的流通股。BlackRock,Inc.和Wellington Management Group LLP分別是第二大和第三大股東,持股比例分別爲7.7%和4.9%。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 16 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

我們的所有權數字顯示,前16名股東的所有權總計佔50%,這意味着沒有單一股東佔有多數。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以增加您的研究價值,但研究分析師建議是了解股票預期表現的更深入的做法。相當多的分析師都對該股票進行了研究,因此您可以輕鬆地查看預測增長。

Insider Ownership Of Globe Life

Globe Life的內部股權情況。

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Globe Life Inc.. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$172m worth of shares (at current prices). If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

股東會對這樣一個情況感興趣:公司內部人員擁有Globe Life股票。它是一家相當大的公司,因此看到一些潛在的意義相似的企業使用內部排斥法是個好兆頭。在這種情況下,他們擁有大約價值1.72億美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。如果您想探討內部排斥行爲的問題,可以單擊此處以查看內部人員是否一直在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 11% stake in Globe Life. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

一般公衆持有Globe Life 11%的股份,雖然佔有這麼大的股份,但如果這個決定與其他大股東不同步,則這可能不足以改變公司的政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Globe Life better, we need to consider many other factors. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for Globe Life you should be aware of, and 1 of them can't be ignored.

考慮到許多其他因素,了解長揸該公司的不同集團很值得思考。需要指出的是:我們已經發現Globe Life存在兩個警示標誌,您應該注意它們,其中一個標誌不容忽視。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您想發現分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這份有關分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論