share_log

Institutional Owners May Ignore Pitney Bowes Inc.'s (NYSE:PBI) Recent US$57m Market Cap Decline as Longer-term Profits Stay in the Green

Institutional Owners May Ignore Pitney Bowes Inc.'s (NYSE:PBI) Recent US$57m Market Cap Decline as Longer-term Profits Stay in the Green

長期利潤仍然保持健康,機構投資者可能會忽略Pitney Bowes Inc.(紐交所:PBI)最近5700萬美元的市值下跌。
Simply Wall St ·  06/14 20:29

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Pitney Bowes' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 14 shareholders
  • Past performance of a company along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 由於機構在該股上有較大的持股,Pitney Bowes的股價可能會受到它們的交易決策的影響。
  • 14位最大股東持有該業務的51%。
  • 公司過去的業績以及所有權數據,有助於形成對業務前景的強烈想法。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Pitney Bowes Inc. (NYSE:PBI), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 56% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

要了解Pitney Bowes Inc. (紐交所:PBI)真正的控制者,重要的是了解該業務的所有權機構。擁有最大餅圖份額的是佔有56%的機構。換句話說,該群體最有可能(或最少)從其對公司的投資中獲得最大收益或損失。

Losing money on investments is something no shareholder enjoys, least of all institutional investors who saw their holdings value drop by 6.0% last week. However, the 43% one-year return to shareholders might have softened the blow. We would assume however, that they would be on the lookout for weakness in the future.

在投資中虧錢是股東最不願意看到的事情,特別是機構投資者,上週他們看到自己的持股價值下降了6.0%。不過,43%的一年回報可能會起到一定的平衡作用。我們認爲,他們將會密切留意未來的弱點。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Pitney Bowes.

在下面的圖表中,我們可以詳細了解Pitney Bowes來自不同所有權群體的情況。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:PBI Ownership Breakdown June 14th 2024
紐交所:PBI所有權分佈2024年6月14日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Pitney Bowes?

機構持股人數告訴我們關於Pitney Bowes的什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Pitney Bowes. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Pitney Bowes' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

正如你所看到的,機構投資者在Pitney Bowes中佔有相當大的股份。這可以表明該公司在投資社區中擁有一定的信譽度。但是,在依賴機構投資者所謂的認可時,最好要小心。他們也會有錯誤判斷。如果多個機構在同一時間改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得查看Pitney Bowes下面的盈利歷史。當然,未來才是真正的重點。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:PBI Earnings and Revenue Growth June 14th 2024
紐交所:PBI盈利和營收增長情況2024年6月14日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Our data indicates that hedge funds own 8.8% of Pitney Bowes. That catches my attention because hedge funds sometimes try to influence management, or bring about changes that will create near term value for shareholders. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 10%. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 9.5% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 8.8% by the third-largest shareholder.

投資者應該注意,機構實際上擁有公司的一半以上,因此它們可以共同行使相當大的權力。我們的數據顯示,對Pitney Bowes而言,對沖基金持股比例爲8.8%。這引起了我的注意,因爲對沖基金有時會試圖影響管理層,或推動會爲股東創造短期價值的變革。該公司最大的股東是The Vanguard Group, Inc.,持股比例爲10%。供參考,持有約9.5%流通股的第二大股東,持有8.8%的第三大股東。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 14 shareholders have a combined ownership of 51% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

我們對所有權數據的深入研究表明,最大的14位股東擁有51%的股權,這意味着沒有單個股東佔據多數。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.

雖然研究一家公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒也是有意義的,以了解風向正在往哪裏吹。雖然有一些分析師對該股票進行了覆蓋,但隨着時間的推移,它可能仍然會變得更加知名。

Insider Ownership Of Pitney Bowes

Pitney Bowes的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

內部人員的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終計數。公司管理層回答董事會,在此應代表股東利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員也在董事會上。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

We can report that insiders do own shares in Pitney Bowes Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$891m, and insiders have US$36m worth of shares, in their own names. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們可以報告內部人員確實擁有Pitney Bowes Inc.的股票。市值僅爲8.91億美元,內部人員擁有價值3600萬美元的個人名下股票。這至少表明了一些公司與抱團取暖。你可以在此處查看他們是否一直在買賣。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 31% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

包括散戶投資者在內的普通大衆擁有該公司的31%股份,因此不能輕易忽略。雖然這個群體不一定能左右決策,但確實可以對公司的經營產生實質性影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for Pitney Bowes you should be aware of.

我發現查看公司股權的最大股東非常有趣。但是要真正獲得洞察力,我們需要考慮其他信息。一個例子:我們已經發現Pitney Bowes的2個警鐘,你應該知道。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您想發現分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這份有關分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論