share_log

Beyond Lackluster Earnings: Potential Concerns For Globus Maritime's (NASDAQ:GLBS) Shareholders

Beyond Lackluster Earnings: Potential Concerns For Globus Maritime's (NASDAQ:GLBS) Shareholders

超出平淡業績:globus maritime(納斯達克:GLBS)股東的潛在關切
Simply Wall St ·  06/14 20:00

Investors were disappointed with Globus Maritime Limited's (NASDAQ:GLBS) recent earnings. We think that they may have more to worry about than just soft profit numbers.

投資者對Globus Maritime Limited(NASDAQ:GLBS)最近的盈利感到失望。我們認爲他們可能有更多的擔憂,而不僅僅是收益低迷。

earnings-and-revenue-history
NasdaqCM:GLBS Earnings and Revenue History June 14th 2024
納斯達克CM:GLBS盈利和收入歷史 2024年6月14日

Examining Cashflow Against Globus Maritime's Earnings

對比Globus Maritime的營收和現金流

As finance nerds would already know, the accrual ratio from cashflow is a key measure for assessing how well a company's free cash flow (FCF) matches its profit. To get the accrual ratio we first subtract FCF from profit for a period, and then divide that number by the average operating assets for the period. The ratio shows us how much a company's profit exceeds its FCF.

正如財務迷們已經知道的那樣,現金流的應計比率是評估公司自由現金流(FCF)與利潤匹配程度的重要指標。爲了獲得應計比率,我們首先減去一段時間的FCF和利潤,然後將該數字除以該期間的平均營運資產。該比率顯示了公司的利潤超過其FCF的多少。

That means a negative accrual ratio is a good thing, because it shows that the company is bringing in more free cash flow than its profit would suggest. While having an accrual ratio above zero is of little concern, we do think it's worth noting when a company has a relatively high accrual ratio. Notably, there is some academic evidence that suggests that a high accrual ratio is a bad sign for near-term profits, generally speaking.

這意味着負的應計比率是一件好事,因爲它表明公司比其利潤所示帶來了更多的自由現金流。雖然應計比率高於零不足爲憑,但如果公司的應計比率相對較高,我們認爲這值得注意。值得注意的是,有一些學術證據表明,相對而言,高應計比率是短期利潤的不利信號。

Over the twelve months to March 2024, Globus Maritime recorded an accrual ratio of 0.23. Unfortunately, that means its free cash flow fell significantly short of its reported profits. Over the last year it actually had negative free cash flow of US$36m, in contrast to the aforementioned profit of US$2.39m. We also note that Globus Maritime's free cash flow was actually negative last year as well, so we could understand if shareholders were bothered by its outflow of US$36m. However, that's not all there is to consider. We can see that unusual items have impacted its statutory profit, and therefore the accrual ratio.

在2023年3月的十二個月內,Globus Maritime的應計比率爲0.23。不幸的是,這意味着它的自由現金流顯著低於其報告的利潤。在過去的一年中,它實際上有3,600萬美元的自由現金流,而以上述2,390萬美元的利潤爲對比。我們還注意到,Globus Maritime的自由現金流去年實際上是負的,所以我們可以理解股東們受到了它超過3,600萬美元的流出的困擾。但這還不是所有需要考慮的因素。我們可以看到,不尋常的項目對其法定利潤以及應計比率產生了影響。公司在去年有超過4,200萬美元的不尋常項目提高了其利潤,這可能在某種程度上解釋了爲什麼它的應計比率如此弱。儘管有更高的利潤總是好的,但不尋常項目的大量貢獻有時會削弱我們的熱情。我們對世界上大多數上市公司進行了數字運算,不尋常項目在性質上通常是一次性的。畢竟,這正是會計術語所暗示的。我們可以看到,Globus Maritime在2023年3月的年度利潤中,未經常規項支撐的正常項目相對於其利潤來說相當重要。因此,我們可以推斷出,不尋常項目正在使其法定利潤顯著強於以往。

That might leave you wondering what analysts are forecasting in terms of future profitability. Luckily, you can click here to see an interactive graph depicting future profitability, based on their estimates.

這可能會讓您想知道分析師對未來盈利能力的預測。幸運的是,您可以單擊此處查看基於其估計的未來盈利能力的互動圖表。

The Impact Of Unusual Items On Profit

除了稀釋之外,還應該注意的是,萬集科技在過去12個月中因不尋常項目獲得了價值人民幣3.5萬元的利潤。雖然我們希望看到利潤增加,但當這些不尋常項目對利潤做出重大貢獻時,我們會更加謹慎。我們對全球大部分上市公司的數據進行了分析,發現不尋常項目往往是一次性的。這正如我們所期望的那樣,因爲這些提升被描述爲"不尋常"。相對於其利潤而言,萬集科技在2021年12月前的不尋常項目貢獻大。因此,我們可以推斷出,這些不尋常項目正在使其財務利潤顯著增強。

The fact that the company had unusual items boosting profit by US$4.2m, in the last year, probably goes some way to explain why its accrual ratio was so weak. While it's always nice to have higher profit, a large contribution from unusual items sometimes dampens our enthusiasm. We ran the numbers on most publicly listed companies worldwide, and it's very common for unusual items to be once-off in nature. And, after all, that's exactly what the accounting terminology implies. We can see that Globus Maritime's positive unusual items were quite significant relative to its profit in the year to March 2024. As a result, we can surmise that the unusual items are making its statutory profit significantly stronger than it would otherwise be.

事實上,在去年,該公司有超過42美元的不尋常項目增加了其利潤,這可能在某種程度上解釋了爲什麼其應計比率如此之弱。雖然具有更高的利潤總是令人愉快的,但不尋常項目的大量貢獻有時會削弱我們的熱情。我們在大多數全球公開上市公司進行了數字運算,並且發現了許多的不尋常項目通常是一次性的。畢竟,這正是會計術語所暗示的。我們可以看到,Globus Maritime在2023年3月的業績中,未經常規項支撐的正常項目相對於其利潤來說相當重要。因此,我們可以推斷出,不尋常項目正在使其法定利潤顯著強於以往。

Our Take On Globus Maritime's Profit Performance

我們對Globus Maritime的利潤表現的看法

Globus Maritime had a weak accrual ratio, but its profit did receive a boost from unusual items. Considering all this we'd argue Globus Maritime's profits probably give an overly generous impression of its sustainable level of profitability. Keep in mind, when it comes to analysing a stock it's worth noting the risks involved. For instance, we've identified 4 warning signs for Globus Maritime (2 are concerning) you should be familiar with.

雖然Globus Maritime的應計比率較低,但其利潤確實受到了不尋常項目的推動。考慮到所有這些,我們認爲Globus Maritime的利潤可能給出了過於慷慨的關於其可持續盈利能力的印象。請記住,在分析股票時,值得注意風險。例如,我們已經確定了Globus Maritime的4個警示信號(其中2個是令人擔憂的),您應該對此有所了解。

In this article we've looked at a number of factors that can impair the utility of profit numbers, and we've come away cautious. But there are plenty of other ways to inform your opinion of a company. For example, many people consider a high return on equity as an indication of favorable business economics, while others like to 'follow the money' and search out stocks that insiders are buying. So you may wish to see this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks with high insider ownership.

在本文中,我們看過了許多會削弱利潤數字效用的因素,並且我們對其持謹慎態度。但是,還有許多其他方法可以了解公司的情況。例如,許多人認爲高淨資產回報率是有利的企業經濟指標,而其他人則喜歡“跟隨資金”並尋找內部人員正在購買的股票。因此,您可能希望查看此免費高淨資產回報率公司集合,或者這個高內部持股的股票列表。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論