share_log

Institutional Investors May Overlook Bandwidth Inc.'s (NASDAQ:BAND) Recent US$67m Market Cap Drop as Long-term Gains Remain Positive

Institutional Investors May Overlook Bandwidth Inc.'s (NASDAQ:BAND) Recent US$67m Market Cap Drop as Long-term Gains Remain Positive

機構投資者可能會忽略帶寬公司(納斯達克:BAND)最近的6,700萬美元市值下跌,因爲長期收益仍然是積極的。
Simply Wall St ·  06/14 19:48

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Bandwidth implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • The top 16 shareholders own 51% of the company
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 機構在Bandwidth中佔有的大量股份意味着他們對公司股價具有重要的影響力。
  • 前16個股東擁有公司的51%股份。
  • 近期內有內部人士出售股票

A look at the shareholders of Bandwidth Inc. (NASDAQ:BAND) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 70% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

觀察Bandwidth Inc. (NASDAQ:BAND)的股東可以告訴我們哪一組最有實力。機構持有70%的股份,是最大的股東,也意味着該組面臨的上行潛力(或下行風險)最大。

Losing money on investments is something no shareholder enjoys, least of all institutional investors who saw their holdings value drop by 12% last week. However, the 25% one-year returns may have helped alleviate their overall losses. We would assume however, that they would be on the lookout for weakness in the future.

投資虧損對於沒有人能夠忍受,股價上週下跌了12%的機構投資者更是如此。然而,25%的年回報率可能有助於減輕他們的整體損失。然而,我們會想,他們很可能會在未來尋找短板。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Bandwidth, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入探討Bandwidth的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:BAND Ownership Breakdown June 14th 2024
NasdaqGS:BAND所有權歸屬於2024年6月14日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Bandwidth?

機構所有權對Bandwidth有何影響?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Bandwidth. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Bandwidth's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

正如您所看到的,機構投資者在Bandwidth中持有相當數量的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經看過該股票並且他們喜歡它。但是就像任何人一樣,他們也可能錯。如果多個機構同時改變他們的股票觀點,則可能看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得查看下面的Bandwidth收益歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:BAND Earnings and Revenue Growth June 14th 2024
NasdaqGS:BAND盈利和營業收入的增長情況於2024年6月14日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Bandwidth. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc. with 10% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 5.7% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 5.1% by the third-largest shareholder.

投資者應該注意到機構實際擁有公司超過一半的股份,因此它們可以集體行使重要的權力。 對於Bandwidth,對沖基金持有的股份不多。從我們的數據來看,最大的股東是BlackRock, Inc.,持有公司流通股的10%。爲了獲得上下文,第二大股東持有約5.7%的流通股,第三大股東持有5.1%的股份。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 16 shareholders have a combined ownership of 51% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

對我們的所有權數據進行更詳細的研究,表明前16號股東擁有51%的股份,暗示沒有單一股東擁有多數股權。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

研究機構持股情況是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以取得相同的結果。相當多的分析師涵蓋了這筆股票,所以你可以很容易地調查預測增長。

Insider Ownership Of Bandwidth

Bandwidth的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Bandwidth Inc.. As individuals, the insiders collectively own US$38m worth of the US$500m company. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們最新的數據表明,公司內部人員擁有Bandwidth Inc.的一些股份。作爲個人,內部人員共擁有這家公司價值3800萬美元的500億美元公司的股份。這至少表明了某種程度的一致性。您可以單擊此處查看有關這些內部人員的購買或銷售的情況。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 18% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Bandwidth. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

擁有18%所有權的普通公衆,主要包括個人投資者,在Bandwidth上擁有一定的影響力。雖然這個組別不一定能夠做出決策,但它確實可以對公司的經營產生實際的影響。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 4.4%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

我們的數據表明,私人公司持有該公司4.4%的股份。這也許值得進一步了解。如果相關方,例如內部人員,在其中一個私人公司中擁有利益,那麼應在年度報告中披露。私人公司也可能對該公司有戰略利益。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 3 warning signs for Bandwidth you should know about.

儘管考慮擁有公司股份的不同組別非常重要,但存在其他更重要的因素。例如,請考慮風險。每個公司都會有風險,我們已經發現Bandwidth有3個警示信號,您應該知道這些。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論