share_log

City Developments (SGX:C09) Investors Are Sitting on a Loss of 35% If They Invested Five Years Ago

City Developments (SGX:C09) Investors Are Sitting on a Loss of 35% If They Invested Five Years Ago

如果五年前投資了城市發展(新加坡交易所:C09),投資者現在將面臨35%的虧損。
Simply Wall St ·  06/14 07:26

Ideally, your overall portfolio should beat the market average. But in any portfolio, there will be mixed results between individual stocks. So we wouldn't blame long term City Developments Limited (SGX:C09) shareholders for doubting their decision to hold, with the stock down 43% over a half decade. And some of the more recent buyers are probably worried, too, with the stock falling 23% in the last year. More recently, the share price has dropped a further 9.4% in a month.

理想情況下,您的整體投資組合應該跑過市場平均水平。但在任何投資組合中,股票的表現會有所不同。因此,長揸新加坡城市發展有限公司股票(SGX:C09)的股東們對自己的決定是否正確有所懷疑,因爲五年內該股下跌了43%。一些較新的股東可能也感到擔憂,因爲該股在過去一年中下跌了23%。最近,股價在一個月內進一步下跌了9.4%。

With that in mind, it's worth seeing if the company's underlying fundamentals have been the driver of long term performance, or if there are some discrepancies.

鑑於此,值得看看該公司的基本面是否一直是長期業績的驅動因素,或者是否存在一些不一致之處。

To paraphrase Benjamin Graham: Over the short term the market is a voting machine, but over the long term it's a weighing machine. One way to examine how market sentiment has changed over time is to look at the interaction between a company's share price and its earnings per share (EPS).

用本傑明·格雷厄姆的話來說:“短期市場是一臺投票機,但長期市場是一臺稱重機”。檢查市場情緒如何隨時間推移變化的一種方式是查看公司股價和每股收益(EPS)之間的相互作用。

City Developments became profitable within the last five years. That would generally be considered a positive, so we are surprised to see the share price is down. Other metrics might give us a better handle on how its value is changing over time.

新加坡城市發展有限公司在過去五年內實現了盈利。通常認爲這是一個積極的信號,因此我們感到意外的是該股的股價下跌了。其他指標可能更好地幫助我們更好地了解其價值隨時間的變化。

Revenue is actually up 4.5% over the time period. A more detailed examination of the revenue and earnings may or may not explain why the share price languishes; there could be an opportunity.

收入實際上在這段時間內增長了4.5%。收入和利潤的更詳細的研究可能會解釋該股爲何走低;這可能是一個機會。

The company's revenue and earnings (over time) are depicted in the image below (click to see the exact numbers).

以下圖像顯示了公司的營業收入和盈利(隨時間變化)(單擊以查看準確的數字)。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SGX:C09 Earnings and Revenue Growth June 13th 2024
SGX:C09 2024年6月13日收益和營收增長

It's probably worth noting we've seen significant insider buying in the last quarter, which we consider a positive. That said, we think earnings and revenue growth trends are even more important factors to consider. So we recommend checking out this free report showing consensus forecasts

值得注意的是,我們在上個季度看到了顯着的內部買入,我們認爲這是一個積極的信號。話雖如此,我們認爲收益和營收增長趨勢更爲重要。因此,我們建議查看這份免費的報告,顯示共識預測。

What About Dividends?

那麼分紅怎麼樣呢?

When looking at investment returns, it is important to consider the difference between total shareholder return (TSR) and share price return. The TSR is a return calculation that accounts for the value of cash dividends (assuming that any dividend received was reinvested) and the calculated value of any discounted capital raisings and spin-offs. So for companies that pay a generous dividend, the TSR is often a lot higher than the share price return. We note that for City Developments the TSR over the last 5 years was -35%, which is better than the share price return mentioned above. The dividends paid by the company have thusly boosted the total shareholder return.

在考慮投資回報時,重要的是考慮總股東回報(TSR)和股票回報之間的差異。 TSR包括任何剝離或折讓的資本籌集(基於股息被重新投資的假設),以及任何股息。因此,對於支付慷慨的股息公司而言,TSR通常比股票回報高得多。就中國神威藥業集團而言,其TSR在過去5年中達到了75%。這超過了我們之前提到的股票回報。該公司支付的股息已經提高了總股東回報。總股東回報股票回報TSR是一種回報計算,考慮到現金股息的價值(假設股息已重新投資),以及任何折扣後的資金籌集和分拆的計算價值。因此,對於支付慷慨股息的公司,TSR通常比股票價格回報高得多。我們注意到,對於新加坡城市發展,過去5年的TSR爲-35%,比上面提到的股價回報好。該公司支付的股息因此增加了;股東回報。

A Different Perspective

不同的觀點

While the broader market gained around 3.6% in the last year, City Developments shareholders lost 22% (even including dividends). However, keep in mind that even the best stocks will sometimes underperform the market over a twelve month period. Unfortunately, last year's performance may indicate unresolved challenges, given that it was worse than the annualised loss of 6% over the last half decade. Generally speaking long term share price weakness can be a bad sign, though contrarian investors might want to research the stock in hope of a turnaround. It's always interesting to track share price performance over the longer term. But to understand City Developments better, we need to consider many other factors. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 3 warning signs for City Developments (of which 1 can't be ignored!) you should know about.

儘管如此,需要注意的是,在過去一年中,即使包括股息在內,新加坡城市發展的股東們也損失了22%,而整個市場在那一年獲得了約3.6%的收益。然而,請記住,即使是最好的股票有時也會在12個月的時間內表現不佳。不幸的是,去年的表現可能表明仍有未解決的挑戰,因爲其表現比過去半個世紀的平均虧損6%還要糟糕。一般來說,長期股價疲軟可能是一個壞跡象,儘管非常規性投資者可能希望研究股票以期望變卦。跟蹤股價表現的長期趨勢總是很有趣的。但是要更好地了解新加坡城市發展,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如風險。每家公司都有風險,我們已經發現了3個警告標誌,其中1個不能被忽視!你應該知道。

City Developments is not the only stock that insiders are buying. For those who like to find lesser know companies this free list of growing companies with recent insider purchasing, could be just the ticket.

城市發展不是唯一的內部人士購買的股票。對於那些想要找到較少知名公司的人,具有最近內部購買的增長公司免費列表可謂絕佳選擇。

Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on Singaporean exchanges.

請注意,本文中引用的市場回報反映了當前在新加坡交易所上市股票的市場加權平均回報。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論