Is Group 1 Automotive (NYSE:GPI) Using Too Much Debt?
Is Group 1 Automotive (NYSE:GPI) Using Too Much Debt?
Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. We note that Group 1 Automotive, Inc. (NYSE:GPI) does have debt on its balance sheet. But should shareholders be worried about its use of debt?
禾倫·巴菲特曾經說過,“波動性與風險遠不等同。”因此,當你考慮某個股票的風險時,你應該考慮債務,因爲過多的債務可能會使一家公司陷入困境。我們注意到,汽車一組(紐交所:GPI)的資產負債表上確實有債務。但股東們應該擔心它的債務使用嗎?
When Is Debt Dangerous?
債務何時有危險?
Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. If things get really bad, the lenders can take control of the business. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Having said that, the most common situation is where a company manages its debt reasonably well - and to its own advantage. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.
當企業無法通過自由現金流或以優惠價籌集資本來輕鬆履行債務時,債務和其他負債變得具有風險性。如果情況變得非常糟糕,放貸人可以接管公司。雖然這並不是太常見的情況,但我們經常看到負債累累的公司因爲放貸人強迫他們以低價籌集資本而永久稀釋股東利益。話雖如此,最常見的情況是一家公司合理掌控債務,真正發揮它的優勢。當我們檢查債務水平時,首先要考慮現金和債務的總和。
How Much Debt Does Group 1 Automotive Carry?
汽車一組承擔了多少債務?
You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that as of March 2024 Group 1 Automotive had US$3.86b of debt, an increase on US$2.90b, over one year. Net debt is about the same, since the it doesn't have much cash.
您可以點擊下面的圖表查看歷史數據,但數據顯示,截至2024年3月,汽車一組的債務總額爲38.6億美元,相比一年前的29億美元有所增加。淨債務相當於現金較少,大體相等。
A Look At Group 1 Automotive's Liabilities
了解汽車一組的負債情況
According to the last reported balance sheet, Group 1 Automotive had liabilities of US$2.72b due within 12 months, and liabilities of US$3.02b due beyond 12 months. On the other hand, it had cash of US$43.7m and US$229.8m worth of receivables due within a year. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$5.46b.
根據最近披露的資產負債表,汽車一組的短期負債爲27.2億美元,長期負債爲30.2億美元。另一方面,它擁有4370萬美元的現金和一年內到期的229.8萬美元的應收款。因此,其負債超過其現金和(短期)應收款的總和爲54.6億美元。
When you consider that this deficiency exceeds the company's US$3.99b market capitalization, you might well be inclined to review the balance sheet intently. Hypothetically, extremely heavy dilution would be required if the company were forced to pay down its liabilities by raising capital at the current share price.
考慮到這種缺陷超過了公司399億美元的市值,你可能會傾向於仔細審查資產負債表。假設在當前股價下,公司被迫償還其債務,則需要進行極度嚴重的稀釋。
We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.
我們通過查看淨債務除以利息、稅、折舊和攤銷前的收益(EBITDA)並計算其利息費用(利息覆蓋)來相對衡量公司的負債水平。這樣,我們考慮債務的絕對規模以及支付的利息費用。
Group 1 Automotive's debt is 3.5 times its EBITDA, and its EBIT cover its interest expense 5.5 times over. Taken together this implies that, while we wouldn't want to see debt levels rise, we think it can handle its current leverage. Unfortunately, Group 1 Automotive saw its EBIT slide 4.4% in the last twelve months. If that earnings trend continues then its debt load will grow heavy like the heart of a polar bear watching its sole cub. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Group 1 Automotive can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.
汽車一組的債務是其EBITDA的3.5倍,而其EBIT覆蓋其利息支出的5.5倍。總體而言,這意味着,雖然我們不希望看到債務水平上升,但我們認爲其目前的槓桿水平可承受。不幸的是,汽車一組在過去12個月中EBIT下降了4.4%。如果這種盈利趨勢繼續下去,那麼它的債務負擔將會像觀察着獨生子女的北極熊的心臟一樣沉重。分析債務水平時,資產負債表是一個顯然的起點。但最終業務的未來盈利能力將決定汽車一組能否隨着時間推移加強其資產負債表。如果關注未來的話,可以查看該免費報告,顯示分析師的盈利預測。
Finally, a company can only pay off debt with cold hard cash, not accounting profits. So we clearly need to look at whether that EBIT is leading to corresponding free cash flow. During the last three years, Group 1 Automotive produced sturdy free cash flow equating to 54% of its EBIT, about what we'd expect. This free cash flow puts the company in a good position to pay down debt, when appropriate.
最後,公司只能用現金而不是會計利潤償還債務。因此,我們明顯需要看看EBIT是否導致相應的自由現金流。在過去的三年中,汽車一組產生了相當穩健的自由現金流,相當於其EBIT的54%,這是我們預期的水平。這種自由現金流使該公司在適當時可以償還債務。
Our View
我們的觀點
Mulling over Group 1 Automotive's attempt at staying on top of its total liabilities, we're certainly not enthusiastic. But on the bright side, its conversion of EBIT to free cash flow is a good sign, and makes us more optimistic. Looking at the bigger picture, it seems clear to us that Group 1 Automotive's use of debt is creating risks for the company. If all goes well, that should boost returns, but on the flip side, the risk of permanent capital loss is elevated by the debt. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for Group 1 Automotive you should be aware of, and 1 of them is potentially serious.
思考汽車一組試圖控制其總負債的努力,我們並不十分熱衷。但光明面是,它把EBIT轉化爲自由現金流的能力是一個好跡象,這讓我們更加樂觀。從更廣泛的角度來看,顯然,汽車一組的債務使用爲公司帶來了風險。如果一切順利,這將提高回報,但反過來,債務可能就會帶來永久性的資本損失風險。我們毫不懷疑,資產負債表是讓我們了解債務最重要的地方。然而,並不是所有的投資風險都存在於資產負債表中-遠非如此。事實證明:我們已經發現汽車一組的2個風險信號,您應該知道其中一個可能是重大的。
When all is said and done, sometimes its easier to focus on companies that don't even need debt. Readers can access a list of growth stocks with zero net debt 100% free, right now.
說到底,有時更容易關注那些甚至不需要債務的公司。讀者可以免費查看零淨債務增長股票列表,立即獲得。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。