share_log

After the Recent Decline, Atlas Lithium Corporation (NASDAQ:ATLX) CEO Marc Fogassa's Holdings Have Lost 29% of Their Value

After the Recent Decline, Atlas Lithium Corporation (NASDAQ:ATLX) CEO Marc Fogassa's Holdings Have Lost 29% of Their Value

最近下跌後,納斯達克的Atlas鋰礦公司(NASDAQ: ATLX)的首席執行官Marc Fogassa的股份已經貶值29%。
Simply Wall St ·  06/13 18:19

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significant insider control over Atlas Lithium implies vested interests in company growth
  • A total of 4 investors have a majority stake in the company with 52% ownership
  • Institutional ownership in Atlas Lithium is 12%
  • 對Atlas Lithium的重大內部控制意味着公司增長中的既得利益
  • 共有4位投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲52%
  • 阿特拉斯鋰業的機構所有權爲12%

If you want to know who really controls Atlas Lithium Corporation (NASDAQ:ATLX), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 41% stake, individual insiders possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果你想知道誰真正控制着阿特拉斯鋰業公司(納斯達克股票代碼:ATLX),那麼你必須看看其股票登記處的構成。個人內部人士持有41%的股份,是公司的最大股份。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。

And last week, insiders endured the biggest losses as the stock fell by 29%.

上週,由於該股下跌了29%,內部人士遭受了最大的損失。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Atlas Lithium.

在下圖中,我們放大了阿特拉斯鋰業的不同所有權群體。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqCM:ATLX Ownership Breakdown June 13th 2024
納斯達克股票代碼:ATLX 所有權明細 2024 年 6 月 13 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Atlas Lithium?

關於阿特拉斯鋰業,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

Atlas Lithium already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Atlas Lithium, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

阿特拉斯鋰業已經在股票登記處設立了機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得檢查一下Atlas Lithium過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqCM:ATLX Earnings and Revenue Growth June 13th 2024
納斯達克股票代碼:ATLX 收益和收入增長 2024 年 6 月 13 日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Atlas Lithium. With a 30% stake, CEO Marc Fogassa is the largest shareholder. Mitsui & Co., Ltd. is the second largest shareholder owning 13% of common stock, and Antonis Palikrousis holds about 5.2% of the company stock.

對沖基金在阿特拉斯鋰業的股份不多。首席執行官馬克·福加薩持有30%的股份,是最大股東。三井物產是第二大股東,擁有13%的普通股,安東尼斯·帕利克魯西斯持有公司約5.2%的股份。

On looking further, we found that 52% of the shares are owned by the top 4 shareholders. In other words, these shareholders have a meaningful say in the decisions of the company.

進一步來看,我們發現前四名股東持有52%的股份。換句話說,這些股東在公司的決策中擁有有意義的發言權。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。有很多分析師在報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。

Insider Ownership Of Atlas Lithium

阿特拉斯鋰業的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終算在內。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行委員會成員的情況並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Atlas Lithium Corporation. Insiders own US$75m worth of shares in the US$180m company. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.

內部人士似乎擁有阿特拉斯鋰業公司的很大一部分股份。內部人士擁有這家價值1.8億美元的公司價值7500萬美元的股份。很高興看到內部人士對這項業務進行如此投資。可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士最近是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 34% stake in Atlas Lithium. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有阿特拉斯鋰業34%的股份。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有權

Public companies currently own 13% of Atlas Lithium stock. We can't be certain but it is quite possible this is a strategic stake. The businesses may be similar, or work together.

上市公司目前擁有阿特拉斯鋰業13%的股份。我們無法確定,但這很可能是一個戰略利益。這些企業可能是相似的,也可以是合作的。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Atlas Lithium better, we need to consider many other factors. For instance, we've identified 5 warning signs for Atlas Lithium (1 is potentially serious) that you should be aware of.

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,爲了更好地了解阿特拉斯鋰業,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,我們已經確定了Atlas Lithium的5個警告信號(其中一個可能很嚴重),你應該注意這些信號。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論