share_log

Institutional Investors May Overlook Root, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:ROOT) Recent US$99m Market Cap Drop as Long-term Gains Remain Positive

Institutional Investors May Overlook Root, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:ROOT) Recent US$99m Market Cap Drop as Long-term Gains Remain Positive

機構投資者可能會忽略開多根保險的最近美國市值下降9,900萬美元,因爲長期收益仍然保持積極。
Simply Wall St ·  06/13 18:01

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Root implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • 52% of the business is held by the top 9 shareholders
  • 21% of Root is held by insiders
  • 機構對Root的實質性持股表明他們對公司的股票價格有重大影響。
  • 前9大股東持有業務的52%。
  • 公司21%的股份由內部持有者持有。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Root, Inc. (NASDAQ:ROOT), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 35% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

要了解Root, Inc. (納斯達克:ROOT)真正的控制權屬於誰,了解企業的所有權結構至關重要。擁有35%股份的機構擁有公司的最大股份,換句話說,該集團面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Losing money on investments is something no shareholder enjoys, least of all institutional investors who saw their holdings value drop by 13% last week. Still, the 675% one-year gains may have helped mitigate their overall losses. We would assume however, that they would be on the lookout for weakness in the future.

虧損的投資是沒有股東願意看到的事情,尤其是機構投資者,他們上一週持有的股票價值下跌了13%。 但是,今年的675%收益率可能有助於緩解他們的總體損失。不過,我們會認爲他們會在未來尋找弱點。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Root.

讓我們更近距離地看看不同類型的股東對Root有什麼影響。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:ROOT Ownership Breakdown June 13th 2024
納斯達克GS:ROOT 2024年6月13日所有權細分。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Root?

機構所有權對Root有什麼影響?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

Root already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Root's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

Root已經有機構在股東名冊上。的確,它們擁有公司的相當大的一部分股份。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定的信譽度,但最好不要過多依賴機構投資者所謂的認可。他們也會有時犯錯。當多個機構擁有一隻股票時,總會存在他們所犯的投資盲區。在沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。您可以在下面查看Root的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住,故事總有更多內容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:ROOT Earnings and Revenue Growth June 13th 2024
納斯達克GS:ROOT 2024年6月13日收益和營業收入增長。

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Root. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Ribbit Management Company, LLC with 13% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 9.7% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 7.5% by the third-largest shareholder. Alexander Timm, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chairman of the Board.

對於Root而言,對沖基金持有的股份不多。從我們的數據來看,最大的股東是Ribbit Management Company,LLC,其擁有13%的流通股。爲了上下文,第二大股東持有約9.7%的流通股,第三大股東持有7.5%的所有權。Alexander Timm是第三大股東,也是董事會主席。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 9 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

進一步調查發現,超過一半的公司股份由前9大股東持有,這表明較大股東的利益在一定程度上被小股東平衡了。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

儘管研究公司的機構持股可以增加您的研究價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。有相當數量的分析師關注該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體觀點可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Root

Root的內部持有。

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

雖然內部人士的精確定義可能是主觀的,幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。管理層最終向董事會負責。但是,如果他們是創始人或CEO,經理成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Root, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$713m, and insiders have US$149m worth of shares in their own names. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.

我們最新的數據表明,Root, Inc.的內部持有量相當合理。公司市值僅爲7.13億美元,內部人士持有價值1.49億美元的股票。這可能表明創始人仍擁有很多股份。您可以單擊此處查看他們是否一直在買賣。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 26% stake in Root. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

通常是個人投資者的普通公衆持有Root的26%股份。雖然這種所有權的規模可能不足以在政策決策方面取得優勢,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Equity Ownership

股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。

Private equity firms hold a 18% stake in Root. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

私募股權公司持有Root的18%股份。這表明他們在關鍵政策決策方面可能具有影響力。有些人可能覺得這很好,因爲私募股權公司有時會成爲追究管理責任的活動家。但其他時候,私募股權公司卻在出售,使其上市。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - Root has 3 warning signs (and 1 which is significant) we think you should know about.

我非常感興趣地看看到底誰擁有一家公司。但是,要真正地獲得洞察力,我們需要考慮其他信息。例如風險 - Root有3個警示標誌(其中1個非常重要),我們認爲您應該了解。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論