share_log

The Recent Pullback Must Have Dismayed Suntec Real Estate Investment Trust (SGX:T82U) Insiders Who Own 39% of the Company

The Recent Pullback Must Have Dismayed Suntec Real Estate Investment Trust (SGX:T82U) Insiders Who Own 39% of the Company

最近的回撤一定讓擁有公司39%股權房地產投資信託(新加坡交易所:T82U)的內部人員感到沮喪。
Simply Wall St ·  06/13 07:28

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significant insider control over Suntec Real Estate Investment Trust implies vested interests in company growth
  • The top 6 shareholders own 52% of the company
  • 22% of Suntec Real Estate Investment Trust is held by Institutions
  • 新興房地產投資信託基金的重要內部控股意味着既得利益與公司的成長息息相關。
  • 前6大股東擁有公司的52%股份。
  • 22%的新興房地產投資信託基金由機構持有。

Every investor in Suntec Real Estate Investment Trust (SGX:T82U) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 39% to be precise, is individual insiders. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

新加坡交易所:T82U的所有股東都應該知道最有力的股東群體。持有公司最多股份的群體,準確地說,約佔39%的股份,是個別內部股東。換句話說,該股東群體最有可能獲得公司的最大利益(或承擔最大風險)。

And last week, insiders endured the biggest losses as the stock fell by 4.5%.

上週,內部股東遭受了最大的損失,因爲股價下跌了4.5%。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Suntec Real Estate Investment Trust.

下圖中,我們關注了新興房地產投資信託基金不同的所有權群體。

ownership-breakdown
SGX:T82U Ownership Breakdown June 12th 2024
新加坡交易所:T82U所有權益之分佈 (截至2024年6月12日)

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Suntec Real Estate Investment Trust?

機構持股能告訴我們什麼信息?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

We can see that Suntec Real Estate Investment Trust does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Suntec Real Estate Investment Trust, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到,新興房地產投資信託基金確實有機構投資者,而且他們持有公司的大部分股份,這表明專業投資者對其具有一定的信譽。但是僅僅依靠這個事實是不夠的,因爲機構投資者和每個人一樣會犯錯誤。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時賣出某隻股票,那麼很可能會看到股價大幅下跌。因此,值得注意的是新興房地產投資信託基金過去的收益趨勢(如下圖所示)。當然,也要考慮其他因素。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SGX:T82U Earnings and Revenue Growth June 12th 2024
新加坡交易所:T82U收益和營業收入增長 (截至2024年6月12日)

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Suntec Real Estate Investment Trust. Yigang Tang is currently the company's largest shareholder with 15% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 10% and 9.0%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

對於新興房地產投資信託基金,對沖基金持有的股份不算多。現任公司最大股東是唐義剛,持有公司15%的股份。同時,第二大和第三大股東各持有公司10%和9.0%的股份。

We also observed that the top 6 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

我們還觀察到,前6大股東持有超過一半的股份登記簿,有一些較小的股東來平衡較大股東的利益。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

儘管研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以深入了解股票的預期表現。有許多分析師對這支股票進行了覆蓋,因此了解他們的預測可能值得一試。

Insider Ownership Of Suntec Real Estate Investment Trust

新興房地產投資信託基金內部股權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Suntec Real Estate Investment Trust. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful S$1.2b stake in this S$3.1b business. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.

我們最近的數據顯示內部股東擁有新興房地產投資信託基金的相當比例。非常有意思的是,內部股東在這家市值約31億新元的公司中擁有有意義的12億新元的股份。大多數人會高興地看到董事會和他們一起投資。您可以訪問此免費圖表以查看內部交易的最新情況。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 38% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

普通公衆--包括零售投資者--擁有公司38%的股權,因此不能輕視。雖然這種所有權規模可能不足以在政策決策中左右局勢,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 4 warning signs with Suntec Real Estate Investment Trust (at least 1 which makes us a bit uncomfortable) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

儘管考慮所有制公司的不同群體是值得的,但其他更重要的因素更值得考慮。例如,不斷出現的投資風險。我們已經發現了4個警示信號,告訴我們新興房地產投資信託基金存在不確定的因素,這些應該成爲您投資過程的一部分。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論