share_log

Institutional Owners May Consider Drastic Measures as Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation's (NYSE:BIPC) Recent US$164m Drop Adds to Long-term Losses

Institutional Owners May Consider Drastic Measures as Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation's (NYSE:BIPC) Recent US$164m Drop Adds to Long-term Losses

隨着 Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation(紐交所:BIPC)最近1.64億美元的下跌,機構投資者可能會考慮採取激烈行動來彌補長期損失。
Simply Wall St ·  06/12 20:21

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Brookfield Infrastructure's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 8 shareholders
  • Past performance of a company along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 由於機構大量持有Brookfield Infrastructure的股票,其股票價格可能受到機構交易決策的影響。
  • 前8大股東持有公司50%的股份。
  • 公司過去的業績以及所有權數據,有助於形成對業務前景的強烈想法。

Every investor in Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation (NYSE:BIPC) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 84% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation(紐交所:BIPC)的所有投資者都應該了解最強大的股東群體。持有84%股份的機構是持股最多的群體。換句話說,他們面臨的上行潛力(或下行風險)最大。

As a result, institutional investors endured the highest losses last week after market cap fell by US$164m. The recent loss, which adds to a one-year loss of 27% for stockholders, may not sit well with this group of investors. Often called "market movers", institutions wield significant power in influencing the price dynamics of any stock. Hence, if weakness in Brookfield Infrastructure's share price continues, institutional investors may feel compelled to sell the stock, which might not be ideal for individual investors.

因此,市值下降1.64億美元后,機構投資者上週蒙受最大損失。對於股東而言,近期虧損加劇,一年的虧損率達27%可能會讓這一投資者群體感到不滿意。機構通常被稱爲"市場動能者",對於影響任何股票價格動態的力量具有重大影響。因此,如果Brookfield Infrastructure的股價繼續走弱,機構投資者可能會感到被迫拋售股票,這可能不利於個人投資者。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Brookfield Infrastructure.

下圖詳細介紹了Brookfield Infrastructure的不同所有權群體。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:BIPC Ownership Breakdown June 12th 2024
紐交所:BIPC 股權分佈2024年6月12日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Brookfield Infrastructure?

機構持股說明Brookfield Infrastructure的某些可信度。但最好注意不要過多依賴於機構投資者的所謂認可。他們也會犯錯誤。當多個機構擁有一隻股票時,總會存在它們處於“擁擠交易”中的風險。當這種交易出現問題時,多個方面可能會競相快速拋售股票。這種風險在沒有增長曆史的公司中更高。您可以在下面看到Brookfield Infrastructure的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是更爲豐富。

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Brookfield Infrastructure. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Brookfield Infrastructure's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

正如您所看到的,機構投資者在Brookfield Infrastructure中持有相當大的股份。這可能表明該公司在投資社區中具有一定程度的可信度。然而,最好警惕過度依賴機構投資者所謂的認證。他們也犯錯誤。當多個機構擁有一隻股票時,總會存在它們處於“擁擠交易”中的風險。當這種交易出現問題時,多個方面可能會競相快速拋售股票。這一風險在沒有增長曆史的公司中會更高。您可以在以下查看Brookfield Infrastructure的歷史收益和收入,但請銘記,故事總是更爲豐富。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:BIPC Earnings and Revenue Growth June 12th 2024
紐交所:BIPC 盈利和收入增長2024年6月12日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Brookfield Infrastructure is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that Brookfield Corporation is the largest shareholder with 17% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 9.1% and 8.2%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

由於機構投資者持有的股份超過了已發行股票的一半,公司董事會可能會關注他們的偏好。Brookfield Infrastructure不屬於對沖基金。我們的數據顯示,Brookfield Corporation是持股17%的最大股東。與此同時,第二大和第三大股東分別持有流通股的9.1%和8.2%。

We did some more digging and found that 8 of the top shareholders account for roughly 50% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我們對Brookfield Infrastructure有了更深入的了解,發現前8位股東佔持股比例的約50%,這意味着除了大股東外還有少數小股東,從而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.

儘管研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的推薦也是一個好禮。該股票受到的分析師覆蓋範圍很小,但不多。因此,它有更多的空間獲得更多的覆蓋範圍。

Insider Ownership Of Brookfield Infrastructure

Brookfield Infrastructure內部股權情況

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

雖然“內部人士”的明確定義具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員,也要向董事會負責。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our information suggests that Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation insiders own under 1% of the company. It is a pretty big company, so it would be possible for board members to own a meaningful interest in the company, without owning much of a proportional interest. In this case, they own around US$290k worth of shares (at current prices). Arguably, recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的信息表明,Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation內部人士持有該公司不到1%的股份。該公司是一家相當大的公司,因此董事會成員可擁有公司的實質性持股利益,而不必擁有相應的比例。在這種情況下,在當前價格下,他們擁有價值約290,000美元的股份。可以點擊這裏查看內部人士是否在買賣。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 16% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

普通大衆——包括零售投資者——擁有該公司的16%的股份,因此不能輕易忽視。雖然這個群體不能決定公司的政策,但它肯定會對公司的運營產生真正的影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - Brookfield Infrastructure has 4 warning signs (and 1 which can't be ignored) we think you should know about.

我非常有興趣了解到底是誰擁有一家公司。但是爲了真正獲得洞察力,我們需要考慮其他信息。例如風險 - Brookfield Infrastructure有4個警告信號(還有1個不能被忽視),我們認爲您應該知道。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論