share_log

Here's Why Caleres (NYSE:CAL) Has A Meaningful Debt Burden

Here's Why Caleres (NYSE:CAL) Has A Meaningful Debt Burden

以下是爲什麼caleres (紐交所: CAL) 有重要的負債負擔
Simply Wall St ·  06/10 23:25

Some say volatility, rather than debt, is the best way to think about risk as an investor, but Warren Buffett famously said that 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. As with many other companies Caleres, Inc. (NYSE:CAL) makes use of debt. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.

作爲投資者,有人認爲波動性而不是債務是風險的最佳衡量標準,但是禾倫·巴菲特曾經著名地說過“波動性和風險遠遠不是同義詞。” 當我們思考一個公司的風險程度時,我們總是喜歡看看其使用債務的情況,因爲債務負擔過重可導致破產。和許多其他公司一樣,Caleres,Inc(紐交所:CAL)使用債務。 但真正的問題是,這些債務是否讓公司變得更加風險。

When Is Debt A Problem?

什麼時候負債才是一個問題?

Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. If things get really bad, the lenders can take control of the business. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. By replacing dilution, though, debt can be an extremely good tool for businesses that need capital to invest in growth at high rates of return. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.

當企業無法輕鬆用自由現金流滿足債務和其他負債,乃至無法以有吸引力的價格籌資時,債務和其他負債就變得有風險。如果情況變得非常糟糕,貸款人可以接管企業。雖然這種情況並不太常見,但我們經常看到負債的公司因爲貸款人強迫他們以困境價格籌集資本而永久稀釋股東。通過取代稀釋,債務可以成爲需要資本以高回報率投資增長的企業極好的工具。當我們考慮企業的債務使用時,我們首先看現金和債務。

What Is Caleres's Net Debt?

Caleres的淨債務是多少?

As you can see below, Caleres had US$191.0m of debt at May 2024, down from US$291.5m a year prior. However, it also had US$30.7m in cash, and so its net debt is US$160.3m.

如下所示,Caleres在2024年5月欠債191.0萬美元,比一年前的291.5萬美元減少了。 然而,它也有307萬美元的現金,因此其淨債務爲160.3萬美元。

debt-equity-history-analysis
NYSE:CAL Debt to Equity History June 10th 2024
紐交所:CAL股票的債務與股本歷史記錄(2024年6月10日)

How Strong Is Caleres' Balance Sheet?

Caleres的資產負債表強度如何?

According to the last reported balance sheet, Caleres had liabilities of US$764.4m due within 12 months, and liabilities of US$519.7m due beyond 12 months. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of US$30.7m as well as receivables valued at US$164.9m due within 12 months. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$1.09b.

根據最近公佈的資產負債表,Caleres在12個月內到期的負債爲764.4萬美元,超過12個月到期的負債爲519.7萬美元。 抵消這些義務,它有307萬美元的現金以及164.9萬美元的應收賬款在12個月內到期。 因此,其負債超過其現金和(短期)應收賬款總和1.09億美元。

This is a mountain of leverage relative to its market capitalization of US$1.16b. Should its lenders demand that it shore up the balance sheet, shareholders would likely face severe dilution.

這相對於其116億美元的市值來說是令人擔憂的大比例槓桿。 如果貸款人要求其加強資產負債表,股東可能面臨嚴重稀釋。

In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.

爲了對公司的債務相對於其收益進行規模適應,我們計算其淨債務與利息、稅、折舊和攤銷前收益(EBITDA)之比及其稅前收益(EBIT)與利息支出之比(利息保障倍數)。因此,我們既考慮到不包括折舊和攤銷費用在內的收益,又包括折舊和攤銷費用的收益相對於債務。

Caleres has a low net debt to EBITDA ratio of only 0.64. And its EBIT easily covers its interest expense, being 11.5 times the size. So we're pretty relaxed about its super-conservative use of debt. On the other hand, Caleres saw its EBIT drop by 5.0% in the last twelve months. If earnings continue to decline at that rate the company may have increasing difficulty managing its debt load. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Caleres's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

Caleres的淨債務與EBITDA之比只有0.64,非常保守。而其EBIT輕鬆覆蓋其利息支出,規模爲11.5倍。 因此,我們對其超級保守的債務使用感到非常放鬆。另一方面,Caleres的EBIT在過去12個月中下降了5.0%。 如果收益率繼續以這個速度下降,公司可能會更難管理其債務負擔。 中心仍然應該放在資產負債表上,然而,更重要的是未來收益,這將決定Caleres的未來維持健康資產負債表的能力。 因此,如果您專注於未來,您可以查看這份免費報告以顯示分析師的利潤預測。

Finally, while the tax-man may adore accounting profits, lenders only accept cold hard cash. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. In the last three years, Caleres's free cash flow amounted to 46% of its EBIT, less than we'd expect. That weak cash conversion makes it more difficult to handle indebtedness.

最後,雖然記賬利潤對稅務機構來說可能非常好,但貸款人只接受真金白銀。 因此,我們總是覈實將多少EBIT轉化爲自由現金流。 在過去三年中,Caleres的自由現金流僅佔其EBIT的46%,低於我們的預期。 這種較弱的現金轉換使處理負債更加困難。

Our View

我們的觀點

Even if we have reservations about how easily Caleres is capable of staying on top of its total liabilities, its interest cover and net debt to EBITDA make us think feel relatively unconcerned. Looking at all the angles mentioned above, it does seem to us that Caleres is a somewhat risky investment as a result of its debt. Not all risk is bad, as it can boost share price returns if it pays off, but this debt risk is worth keeping in mind. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. We've identified 1 warning sign with Caleres , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

即使我們對Caleres有關於其總負債能否輕鬆應對的顧慮,但其利息覆蓋率和淨債務與EBITDA使我們覺得相對不太擔心。從上面提到的所有角度來看,我們似乎可以認爲,由於債務的原因,Caleres是一項有些風險的投資。並不是所有的風險都是壞事,如果盈利回報很高,它可以提高股票的回報,但這種債務風險值得考慮。毫無疑問,我們最了解負債的是從資產負債表中。 但最終,每個公司都可能包含超出資產負債表之外的風險。我們已經識別出Caleres的1個警告信號,理解它們應該是您投資過程的一部分。

If, after all that, you're more interested in a fast growing company with a rock-solid balance sheet, then check out our list of net cash growth stocks without delay.

如果您在所有這些工作之後,更感興趣於擁有堅實資產負債表的快速發展公司,請立即查看我們的淨現金成長股列表。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論