share_log

With 88% Ownership, Synopsys, Inc. (NASDAQ:SNPS) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing

With 88% Ownership, Synopsys, Inc. (NASDAQ:SNPS) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing

憑藉88%的股權,Synopsys公司(納斯達克股票代碼:SNPS)擁有強大的機構支持。
Simply Wall St ·  06/10 23:16

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Synopsys implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price

  • The top 18 shareholders own 51% of the company

  • Recent sales by insiders

  • 機構對新思科技的大量持股意味着他們對該公司的股價有重大影響力。

  • 排名前18位的股東擁有公司的51%股份。

  • 內部人士最近出售了該公司的股票。

A look at the shareholders of Synopsys, Inc. (NASDAQ:SNPS) can tell us which group is most powerful.  We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 88% ownership.  Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

查看納斯達克上新思科技(Synopsys,Inc.)的股東可告訴我們哪個組合最具有影響力。我們可以看到機構持有公司的大部分股權,佔比達88%。換句話說,該組合面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors.  Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.  

考慮到它們擁有的大量資金和研究能力,機構所有權往往會產生很大的影響力,特別是對個人投資者。因此,機構投資於該公司的資金往往是對公司未來的極大信心的表態。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Synopsys, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入研究一下Synopsys的每一種所有者,從下面的圖表開始。

NasdaqGS:SNPS Ownership Breakdown June 10th 2024

納斯達克SNPS所有權分佈2024年6月10日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Synopsys?

機構投資者對新思科技的意義是什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

We can see that Synopsys does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock.  This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does.  It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Synopsys, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到,新思科技確實有機構投資者,他們持有公司的相當比例股票。這表明專業投資者中有一些可信度。但我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲一些機構有時也會做出錯誤的投資,就像其他人一樣。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售股票,股價大跌也是很常見的現象。因此,查看新思科技的過去盈利軌跡(如下)是值得的。當然,也要記住要考慮其他因素。

NasdaqGS:SNPS Earnings and Revenue Growth June 10th 2024

納斯達克SNPS收入和收益增長2024年6月10日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences.    Hedge funds don't have many shares in Synopsys.      The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 9.0%.       For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 8.2% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 4.9% by the third-largest shareholder.  

由於機構投資者持有超過半數的已發行股票,董事會可能需要關注他們的偏好。對新思科技而言,對沖基金並不擁有很多股份。該公司最大的股東是The Vanguard Group,Inc.,持股比例爲9.0%。爲了便於解釋,持股比例排名第二的股東持有約8.2%的流通股份,而排名第三的持股比例爲4.9%。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 18 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.  

通過查看股東註冊表,我們可以看到排名前18位股東控制了51%的股權,這意味着沒有單一股東擁有所有權的多數利益。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing.   Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.  

雖然爲公司研究機構所有權數據很有意義,但研究分析師預期情況也很重要。相當多的分析師覆蓋了該股,因此您可以很容易地查看預測增長。

Insider Ownership Of Synopsys

新思科技的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least.  The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間存在差異。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少捕捉了董事會成員。公司管理層向董事會負責,後者應代表股東利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會擔任董事會成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Synopsys, Inc. in their own names.   Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$514m of stock.  In this sort of situation, it can be more interesting to  see if those insiders have been buying or selling.  

根據我們的數據,內部人員在他們自己的姓名下擁有不到1%的新思科技股份。由於公司規模如此之大,我們不會指望內部人員擁有大量的股份。綜合來看,他們擁有價值5.14億美元的股票。在這種情況下,更有趣的是看看那些內部人員是否一直在買賣。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 11% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored.   This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

普通公衆,包括散戶投資者,在該公司中佔有11%的股份,因此不容忽視。儘管此一股份規模相當可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致,則可能無法改變公司政策。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論