share_log

Brady Corporation (NYSE:BRC) Is Largely Controlled by Institutional Shareholders Who Own 76% of the Company

Brady Corporation (NYSE:BRC) Is Largely Controlled by Institutional Shareholders Who Own 76% of the Company

Brady公司(紐交所:BRC)由佔公司76%的機構股東控制。
Simply Wall St ·  06/10 21:28

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Brady's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • A total of 10 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 考慮到機構在Brady的股權佔比較大,機構的交易決策可能會對Brady的股價產生影響。
  • 共有10位投資者擁有該公司50%的所有權。
  • 近期內有內部人士出售股票

A look at the shareholders of Brady Corporation (NYSE:BRC) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 76% to be precise, is institutions. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

觀察股東構成可以得知,Brady Corporation (NYSE:BRC)的持股中,機構投資者佔據了最大的一部分,具體而言,佔據了公司股份的約76%。換句話說,該群體將從他們對公司的投資中獲得最多(或失去最多)利益。

Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

由於機構擁有巨額資金,他們的市場舉動往往受到零售或個人投資者的嚴密審查。因此,機構在公司中的大量投資通常被認爲是一個積極的特徵。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Brady.

下圖展示了Brady不同所有權群體的持股情況。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:BRC Ownership Breakdown June 10th 2024
NYSE:BRC所有權結構拆分2024年6月10日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Brady?

機構投資者持股情況能爲我們提供哪些關於Brady的信息?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Brady. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Brady's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

正如你所見,機構投資者持有Brady的股份佔比相當大,這表明Brady受到專業投資者的認可。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構投資者有時也會做出糟糕的投資決策,就像每個人一樣。當多個機構擁有一支股票時,總會存在“擁擠交易”的風險。當這樣的交易出現問題時,可能會出現多方競相拋售股票的情況。在沒有成長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。你可以看到Brady的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住,故事總是更爲複雜的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:BRC Earnings and Revenue Growth June 10th 2024
NYSE:BRC收益和營收增長2024年6月10日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Brady. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc. with 11% of shares outstanding. With 10% and 9.4% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and Elizabeth Bruno are the second and third largest shareholders. Elizabeth Bruno, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Member of the Board of Directors.

由於機構投資者持有超過半數的發行股份,董事會可能需要關注他們的偏好。我們注意到,對Brady沒有意義的對沖基金投資。從我們的數據可以看出,最大的股東是The Vanguard Group, Inc.,持有11%的流通股。BlackRock, Inc.和Elizabeth Bruno分別持有10%和9.4%的流通股,是第二和第三大股東。作爲第三大股東,Elizabeth Bruno還持有董事會成員的職務。

We also observed that the top 10 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

我們還觀察到,前10大股東持有超過半數股份,有一些較小的股東以一定程度上平衡更大股東的利益。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然仔細研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師對該股票的看法也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在跟蹤該股票,因此了解他們對於未來發展的總體看法可能會有所幫助。

Insider Ownership Of Brady

Brady的內部所有權情況

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

內部人員的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終計數。公司管理層回答董事會,在此應代表股東利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員也在董事會上。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Brady Corporation. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$314m worth of shares (at current prices). If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

股東可能會有興趣了解內部人持有Brady Corporation的股票,因爲這是一家大公司,所以看到這種程度的一致性是好的。內部人持有價值3.14億美元的股份(按當前價格計算)。如果你想探究內部人的一致性問題,可以點擊這裏查看內部人是否一直在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 14% stake in Brady. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

普通公衆通常持有Brady 14%的股份。雖然這個群體不能稱之爲決策者,但它肯定會在公司的運營中產生實際影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for Brady that you should be aware of before investing here.

我認爲查看一家公司的真正所有者非常有趣。但爲了真正獲得洞察力,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們發現了Brady的1個警示信號,你在開始投資之前應該注意。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您想發現分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這份有關分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論