share_log

Organon & Co. (NYSE:OGN) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 80%

Organon & Co. (NYSE:OGN) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 80%

Organon&Co.(紐交所:OGN)是機構投資者最喜歡的股票之一,他們擁有80%的股份。
Simply Wall St ·  06/09 21:39

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Organon's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • The top 15 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 機構持股顯著高,說明Organon的股價對機構的交易行爲很敏感。
  • 前15大股東擁有該公司50%的股份。
  • 所有權研究和分析師預測數據有助於更好地了解股票市場的機會。

If you want to know who really controls Organon & Co. (NYSE:OGN), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 80% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果您想知道誰真正控制Organon & Co.(NYSE:OGN),那麼您必須查看其股權登記簿的構成。佔據80%份額的機構持有公司的最大股份,這意味着如果股票上漲(或出現下行趨勢),該群體將受益最多(或虧損最多)。

Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

由於機構擁有巨額資金,他們的市場舉動往往受到零售或個人投資者的嚴密審查。因此,機構在公司中的大量投資通常被認爲是一個積極的特徵。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Organon.

在下面的圖表中,我們放大了Organon的不同所有權組。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:OGN Ownership Breakdown June 9th 2024
NYSE:OGN所有權拆分2024年6月9日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Organon?

機構持股對Organon有什麼影響?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

We can see that Organon does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Organon's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我們可以看到Organon確實有機構投資者;並且他們持有公司的相當一部分股票。這可能表明該公司在投資社區中具有一定的可靠性。但是,最好不要過於依賴機構投資者所帶來的所謂認可。他們也有時會犯錯誤。當多個機構持有一支股票時,總會存在他們處於'擁擠交易'中的風險。當此類交易出現問題時,多個方可能會競相快速賣出股票。在沒有增長曆史的公司中,此風險更高。您可以在下面看到Organon的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住,這只是故事的一部分。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:OGN Earnings and Revenue Growth June 9th 2024
NYSE:OGN收入和營收增長2024年6月9日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Organon. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc. with 13% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 12% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 3.9% by the third-largest shareholder.

機構投資者擁有公司的50%以上,因此他們可以共同強烈影響董事會的決策。我們注意到,對Organon的對沖基金投資不重要。從我們的數據來看,最大的股東是BlackRock,擁有13%的流通股。爲了了解情況,第二大股東持有約12%的流通股,第三大股東持有3.9%的所有權。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 15 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

仔細觀察我們的股權拆分數據表明,前15大股東持有的股權總和爲50%,這意味着沒有任何單一股東擁有多數股份。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目的。由於有相當數量的分析師涵蓋這支股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會有所幫助。

Insider Ownership Of Organon

Organon的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

雖然“內部人士”的明確定義具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員,也要向董事會負責。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Organon & Co.. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own US$11m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們最新的數據顯示,內部人員持有Organon & Co.不到1%的股份。請記住,這是一家大公司,內部人員擁有價值1100萬美元的股份,絕對價值可能比比例份額更重要。看到董事會成員持有股份很好,但檢查那些內部人員是否一直在購買股票可能是值得的。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 19% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

包括散戶投資者在內的普通公衆擁有該公司19%的股份,因此不能輕易忽略他們。儘管這種所有權的大小可能不足以在其利益方面左右政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for Organon (1 is concerning!) that you should be aware of before investing here.

雖然考慮擁有公司的不同群體非常值得,但有其他更重要的因素。例如,我們發現Organon存在2個預警信號(1個引人關注!)在在此投資之前應該了解這些事實。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論