share_log

With 69% Ownership of the Shares, Fortinet, Inc. (NASDAQ:FTNT) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

With 69% Ownership of the Shares, Fortinet, Inc. (NASDAQ:FTNT) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

由機構持股佔比高達69%,Fortinet, Inc.(納斯達克交易代碼:FTNT)受制於機構股東。
Simply Wall St ·  06/09 20:45

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Fortinet implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 13 shareholders
  • Insider ownership in Fortinet is 16%
  • 飛塔信息的機構持股表明他們對公司的股價有重大影響。
  • 前13大股東持有該業務的51%。
  • 飛塔信息的內部股東持股比例爲16%。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Fortinet, Inc. (NASDAQ:FTNT), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 69% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果想要了解飛塔信息真正的控制者是誰,重要的是要了解該業務的所有權結構。機構擁有該公司的最大股份,佔69%。換句話說,該集團面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

由於機構有許多資金,因此他們的市場走勢往往會受到零售或個人投資者的密切關注。因此,機構投資公司的良好部分通常是對其未來充滿信心的重要標誌。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Fortinet, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入了解飛塔信息各種所有者的情況,從下面的圖表開始。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:FTNT Ownership Breakdown June 9th 2024
納斯達克:FTNT所有權細分,2024年6月9日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Fortinet?

機構持股告訴我們有什麼關於飛塔信息的?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

Fortinet already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Fortinet's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

飛塔信息已經有機構持有該公司股份。事實上,它們擁有公司的相當大一部分股份。這可能表示該公司在投資社區中有一定的信譽度。但是,最好謹慎地依賴機構投資者所提供的所謂的認可。他們也會犯錯誤。如果多個機構同時改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,看看下面的飛塔信息收入歷史表可能是值得的。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:FTNT Earnings and Revenue Growth June 9th 2024
納斯達克:FTNT收益和營業收入增長,2024年6月9日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Fortinet is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc. with 8.9% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 8.3% and 7.4%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Note that the second and third-largest shareholders are also Chief Executive Officer and Member of the Board of Directors, respectively, meaning that the company's top shareholders are insiders.

機構投資者持有超過50%的股份,因此他們可能能夠強烈影響董事會的決策。飛塔信息不是由對沖基金持有的。從我們的數據來看,持有最多股票的股東是The Vanguard Group,佔流通股的8.9%。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有流通股的8.3%和7.4%,意味着公司的最大股東是內部人士。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 13 have the combined ownership of 51% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

經過更加深入的挖掘,我們發現前13名股東在該公司擁有51%的股權,這表明沒有單一股東對該公司有重大控制權。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期性能的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以實現同樣的效果。很多分析師都在關注該股票,看看他們的預測值得不值得。

Insider Ownership Of Fortinet

飛塔信息的內部股權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少捕捉到董事會成員的記錄。公司管理人員向董事會報告,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員自己也在董事會中。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Fortinet, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$46b, and insiders have US$7.2b worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們的信息表明內部人士持有飛塔信息的很多股份。它的市值只有460億美元,內部人士擁有自己名下的72億美元的股份,這相當可觀。能看到這種投資水平是好的。你可以在這裏查看他們最近是否一直在購買。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 15% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Fortinet. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

公衆股東持有15%的股份,主要由個人投資者組成,他們在飛塔信息中有一定的影響力。儘管這種所有權規模相當大,但如果決策與其他大股東的決策不一致,可能無法改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Fortinet better, we need to consider many other factors. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 2 warning signs for Fortinet (of which 1 doesn't sit too well with us!) you should know about.

思考公司的股東群體總是值得的。但要更好地了解飛塔信息,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如風險。每個公司都有風險,我們已經發現了飛塔信息的2個風險信號(其中1個對我們來說不太好)。你應該了解這些風險信號。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論