share_log

With 59% Ownership of the Shares, Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. (NASDAQ:WBA) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

With 59% Ownership of the Shares, Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. (NASDAQ:WBA) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

擁有59%股份的沃爾格林斯聯盟公司(納斯達克股票代碼:WBA)被機構投資者大量持有。
Simply Wall St ·  06/08 22:52

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Walgreens Boots Alliance's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • The top 12 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Insiders have been buying lately
  • 由於機構在該股票中佔有很大的份額,沃爾格林-聯合博姿的股價可能受到它們的交易決定的影響。
  • 前12名股東擁有該公司50%的股份。
  • 內部人員最近一直在買入。

If you want to know who really controls Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. (NASDAQ:WBA), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 59% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果你想知道誰真正控制了沃爾格林-聯合博姿,Inc. (納斯達克:WBA),那麼你必須看看它的股權登記表。持有公司股票數量最多的這一組人,準確來說,佔了公司的股份約59%,就是機構。換句話說,這一組人面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

由於機構擁有大量的資金和研究能力,因此機構所有權往往具有相當的分量,特別是對於個人投資者。因此,機構在一家企業中投資的規模可視爲該企業的一項重要資產。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Walgreens Boots Alliance.

在下面的圖表中,我們詳細介紹了沃爾格林-聯合博姿的不同所有權組。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:WBA Ownership Breakdown June 8th 2024
納斯達克GS:WBA 2024年6月8日的所有權分析。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Walgreens Boots Alliance?

機構持股情況揭示了沃爾格林-聯合博姿的相關信息。

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

We can see that Walgreens Boots Alliance does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Walgreens Boots Alliance, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到,沃爾格林-聯合博姿確實擁有機構投資者,他們持有該公司的相當一部分股票。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經觀察了這支股票並且他們認爲它很好。但就像其他任何人一樣,他們也可能是錯誤的。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售某支股票,股價大幅下跌並不罕見。因此,值得檢查沃爾格林-聯合博姿過去的收益軌跡(如下)。當然,要記住還有其他要考慮的因素。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:WBA Earnings and Revenue Growth June 8th 2024
納斯達克GS:WBA 2024年6月8日的收益和營業收入增長情況。

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Walgreens Boots Alliance. Newcip S.A. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 17% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 9.5% and 7.9% of the stock.

由於機構投資者持有超過一半的已發行股票,董事會可能會注意他們的偏好。對於沃爾格林-聯合博姿,對沖基金不持有太多股份。Newcip S.A.目前是該公司最大的股東,持有17%的流通股。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有大約9.5%和7.9%的股份。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 12 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

經過一些調查,我們發現前12名股東在公司中擁有50%的股份,表明沒有單一股東對公司具有重大控制權。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

研究機構持股情況是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以取得相同的結果。相當多的分析師涵蓋了這筆股票,所以你可以很容易地調查預測增長。

Insider Ownership Of Walgreens Boots Alliance

沃爾格林-聯合博姿的內部股權情況。

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.. However, it's possible that insiders might have an indirect interest through a more complex structure. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$65m worth of shares (at current prices). It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們最近的數據表明,內部人員擁有的沃爾格林-聯合博姿的股份不到1%。然而,內部人員可能通過更復雜的結構間接擁有利益。它是一家非常大的公司,所以看到內部人員持有公司的大部分股份會令人驚訝。雖然他們的持股不足1%,但我們可以看到董事會成員集體持有價值6500萬美元的股份(按當前價格計算)。擁有至少一些內部股權總是好的,但值得檢查的是那些內部人員是否一直在拋售。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 23% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Walgreens Boots Alliance. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

由於普通大衆擁有23%的股份,主要由個人投資者組成,他們在沃爾格林-聯合博姿有一定的影響力。雖然這個持股規模相當大,但如果決策與其他大型股東不一致,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 17%, of the company's shares. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

我們的數據顯示,私人公司持有17%的該公司股份。私人公司可能是相關方。有時內部人員通過持有私人公司的股份,而不是個人的身份,對公共公司產生利益。雖然很難得出任何廣泛的結論,但值得注意的是需要進一步研究的領域。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Walgreens Boots Alliance better, we need to consider many other factors. Be aware that Walgreens Boots Alliance is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , you should know about...

考慮擁有公司股票的不同群體總是有價值的。但要更好地了解沃爾格林-聯合博姿,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。請注意,沃爾格林-聯合博姿在我們的投資分析中顯示出2個警告跡象,你應該知道......

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論