share_log

Otter Tail Corporation (NASDAQ:OTTR) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 59% of the Company

Otter Tail Corporation (NASDAQ:OTTR) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 59% of the Company

納斯達克奧特泰爾公司(OTTR)得到持有該公司59%股份的機構投資者的青睞。
Simply Wall St ·  06/08 21:35

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Otter Tail's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • A total of 10 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Past performance of a company along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 高機構所有權意味着 Otter Tail 的股價對其交易行爲很敏感
  • 共有10名投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲51%
  • 公司過去的表現以及所有權數據可以使人們對企業前景有一個很好的了解

Every investor in Otter Tail Corporation (NASDAQ:OTTR) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 59% to be precise, is institutions. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

Otter Tail Corporation(納斯達克股票代碼:OTTR)的每位投資者都應該知道最強大的股東群體。持有該公司股份最多的集團是機構,準確地說約爲59%。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果出現低迷,則損失最大)。

Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.

由於機構可以獲得大量資金,因此他們的市場走勢往往會受到散戶或個人投資者的嚴格審查。因此,將大量機構資金投資於公司通常被視爲理想的特徵。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Otter Tail, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究 Otter Tail 的每種擁有者。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:OTTR Ownership Breakdown June 8th 2024
納斯達克GS:OTR 所有權明細 2024 年 6 月 8 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Otter Tail?

機構所有權告訴我們關於 Otter Tail 的什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

We can see that Otter Tail does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Otter Tail, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到,Otter Tail確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司很大一部分股票。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎地依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們有時也會弄錯。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得檢查一下Otter Tail過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:OTTR Earnings and Revenue Growth June 8th 2024
納斯達克GS:OTR 收益和收入增長 2024 年 6 月 8 日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Otter Tail. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 16% of shares outstanding. With 13% and 8.3% of the shares outstanding respectively, The Vanguard Group, Inc. and Cascade Investment, L.L.C. are the second and third largest shareholders. Additionally, the company's CEO Charles MacFarlane directly holds 0.7% of the total shares outstanding.

投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有公司一半以上的股份,因此它們可以共同行使巨大的權力。我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對Otter Tail進行有意義的投資。貝萊德公司目前是該公司的最大股東,已發行股份的16%。Vanguard Group, Inc.和Cascade Investment, L.L.C. 分別擁有13%和8.3%的已發行股份,是第二和第三大股東。此外,該公司首席執行官查爾斯·麥克法蘭直接持有已發行股份總額的0.7%。

We also observed that the top 10 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

我們還觀察到,前十名股東佔股票登記冊的一半以上,少數規模較小的股東可以在一定程度上平衡大股東的利益。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。儘管有一些分析師的報道,但該公司的報道可能並不廣泛。因此,在未來它可能會引起更多關注。

Insider Ownership Of Otter Tail

Otter Tail 的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也是董事會成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

We can report that insiders do own shares in Otter Tail Corporation. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$80m worth of shares (at current prices). If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我們可以報告說,內部人士確實擁有Otter Tail Corporation的股份。這是一家大公司,因此很高興看到這種一致性。內部人士擁有價值8000萬美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。如果您想探討內幕調整問題,可以點擊此處查看內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 30% stake in Otter Tail. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有Otter Tail30%的股份。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股權所有權

Private equity firms hold a 8.3% stake in Otter Tail. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

私募股權公司持有 Otter Tail 8.3% 的股份。這表明他們可以在關鍵政策決策中發揮影響力。有些人可能會喜歡這樣,因爲私募股權有時是追究管理層責任的激進分子。但是其他時候,私募股權在公司上市後正在售罄。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - Otter Tail has 2 warning signs (and 1 which is a bit unpleasant) we think you should know about.

儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。以風險爲例-Otter Tail 有 2 個警告標誌(其中 1 個有點不愉快),我們認爲你應該知道。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一樣,你可能需要考慮這家公司是會成長還是會萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份免費報告,其中顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論