share_log

Institutional Investors in SFL Corporation Ltd. (NYSE:SFL) Lost 3.0% Last Week but Have Reaped the Benefits of Longer-term Growth

Institutional Investors in SFL Corporation Ltd. (NYSE:SFL) Lost 3.0% Last Week but Have Reaped the Benefits of Longer-term Growth

上週紐交所公司SFL Corporation Ltd.(NYSE:SFL)的機構投資者虧損了3.0%,但已經收穫了更長期的創業板。
Simply Wall St ·  06/07 21:38

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies SFL's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • The top 10 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 機構所有權顯著高表明SFL的股價對他們的交易行動非常敏感。
  • 前十大股東擁有該公司的50%。
  • 所有權研究和分析師預測數據有助於更好地了解股票市場的機會。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of SFL Corporation Ltd. (NYSE:SFL), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 42% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

爲了了解誰真正控制着SFL公司(NYSE:SFL),了解公司的所有權結構是很重要的。機構擁有該公司的42%股份。換句話說,集團從他們對公司的投資中獲得最多(或最少)。

No shareholder likes losing money on their investments, especially institutional investors who saw their holdings drop 3.0% in value last week. Still, the 64% one-year gains may have helped mitigate their overall losses. But they would probably be wary of future losses.

沒有股東喜歡在他們的投資中虧損,特別是看到他們持有的股票上週跌了3.0%的機構投資者。儘管如此,在過去一年中64%的漲幅或許有助於減輕他們的整體虧損,但他們可能仍會對未來的虧損感到謹慎。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of SFL.

下面的圖表顯示了SFL公司不同的所有權集團。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:SFL Ownership Breakdown June 7th 2024
NYSE:SFL所有權結構2024年6月7日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About SFL?

機構所有權告訴我們SFL有什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

SFL already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at SFL's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

SFL的股份登記簿上已經有機構了。他們擁有公司的一部分股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師們已經研究過這隻股票,並喜歡它。但就像其他人一樣,他們也可能錯了。如果多個機構同時改變對某股票的看法,股價會迅速下跌。因此,查看下面SFL的收益歷史也是值得的。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:SFL Earnings and Revenue Growth June 7th 2024
NYSE:SFL收益和營業收入增長2024年6月7日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in SFL. Our data shows that Greenwich Holdings Ltd. is the largest shareholder with 20% of shares outstanding. DNB Asset Management AS is the second largest shareholder owning 9.3% of common stock, and Dimensional Fund Advisors LP holds about 7.1% of the company stock.

對SFL而言,對沖基金沒有太多的股份。根據我們的數據,Greenwich Holdings Ltd.是最大的股東,持有20%的流通股。DNB Asset Management AS是第二大股東,擁有公司普通股的9.3%,而Dimensional Fund Advisors LP則持有公司7.1%的股份。

We also observed that the top 10 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

我們還觀察到,前10大股東持有超過半數股份,有一些較小的股東以一定程度上平衡更大股東的利益。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期性能的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以實現同樣的效果。很多分析師都在關注該股票,看看他們的預測值得不值得。

Insider Ownership Of SFL

SFL的內部持股情況

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

雖然內部人士的精確定義可能是主觀的,幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。管理層最終向董事會負責。但是,如果他們是創始人或CEO,經理成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of SFL Corporation Ltd.. But they may have an indirect interest through a corporate structure that we haven't picked up on. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own US$2.0m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們最近的數據顯示內部人員擁有SFL公司的不到1%的股份。但他們可能通過我們沒有發現的公司結構間接擁有利益。請記住,這是一家大公司,內部人員擁有價值200萬美元的股份。絕對價值可能比所佔比例更重要。看到董事會成員擁有股份是一個好的信號,但檢查這些內部人員是否一直在買入股票也是值得的。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 37% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

普通公衆--包括零售投資者--擁有公司的37%股份,因此不容易被忽視。儘管該所有權比例相當大,但如果決策與其他大股東不相符,它可能不足以改變公司政策。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

We can see that Private Companies own 20%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

我們可以看到私人公司擁有該公司20%的股份。這可能值得更深入地研究。如果相關方,如內部人員,對這些私人公司的任意一個有利益,那麼這應該在年度報告中披露。私人公司也可能對該公司有戰略利益。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 3 warning signs for SFL (of which 2 are a bit concerning!) you should know about.

雖然考慮到公司所有權的不同集團是值得的,但還有更重要的因素,例如風險。每家公司都有風險,我們已經發現SFL有3個警告信號(其中2個令人有點擔憂!)你應該知道。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論