share_log

Should We Be Cautious About Open Text Corporation's (NASDAQ:OTEX) ROE Of 4.1%?

Should We Be Cautious About Open Text Corporation's (NASDAQ:OTEX) ROE Of 4.1%?

我們應該對納斯達克上市公司open text(OTEX)的4.1% roe持謹慎態度嗎?
Simply Wall St ·  06/06 22:40

Many investors are still learning about the various metrics that can be useful when analysing a stock. This article is for those who would like to learn about Return On Equity (ROE). We'll use ROE to examine Open Text Corporation (NASDAQ:OTEX), by way of a worked example.

許多投資者仍在學習有用的股票分析指標。這篇文章是爲那些想學習ROE的人準備的。本文將以Open Text Corporation (NASDAQ:OTEX)作爲例子,使用ROE進行分析。

Return on equity or ROE is a key measure used to assess how efficiently a company's management is utilizing the company's capital. Put another way, it reveals the company's success at turning shareholder investments into profits.

股本回報率或roe是一項關鍵指標,用於評估公司管理層使用公司資本的效率。換句話說,它揭示了公司將股東的投資轉化爲利潤的成功。

How Is ROE Calculated?

淨資產收益率怎麼計算?

The formula for ROE is:

roe的公式是:

Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity

淨資產收益率 = 淨利潤(從持續經營中獲得)÷ 股東權益

So, based on the above formula, the ROE for Open Text is:

因此,根據上述公式,Open Text的ROE爲:

4.1% = US$168m ÷ US$4.1b (Based on the trailing twelve months to March 2024).

4.1%=1.68億美元÷41億美元(截至2024年3月的過去十二個月)。

The 'return' refers to a company's earnings over the last year. So, this means that for every $1 of its shareholder's investments, the company generates a profit of $0.04.

“回報”是指公司過去一年的收益。因此,這意味着對於每個股東的投資1美元,公司會產生0.04美元的利潤。

Does Open Text Have A Good Return On Equity?

Open Text的ROE表現如何?

Arguably the easiest way to assess company's ROE is to compare it with the average in its industry. However, this method is only useful as a rough check, because companies do differ quite a bit within the same industry classification. If you look at the image below, you can see Open Text has a lower ROE than the average (11%) in the Software industry classification.

可以說,評估公司的ROE最簡單的方法是將其與行業平均水平進行比較。然而,這種方法僅僅適用於初步檢查,因爲即使在同一行業分類中,公司之間也存在很大差異。如果您查看下面的圖片,您可以看到Open Text在軟件行業分類中的平均ROE爲11%,低於行業平均水平。

roe
NasdaqGS:OTEX Return on Equity June 6th 2024
NasdaqGS:OTEX ROE 2024年6月6日

Unfortunately, that's sub-optimal. That being said, a low ROE is not always a bad thing, especially if the company has low leverage as this still leaves room for improvement if the company were to take on more debt. A high debt company having a low ROE is a different story altogether and a risky investment in our books. To know the 4 risks we have identified for Open Text visit our risks dashboard for free.

不幸的是,這是一個次優的結果。話雖如此,低ROE並不總是壞事,特別是如果公司槓桿率低,這仍會留下改善的空間,如果公司增加債務,就可以從中獲得好處。高負債的公司ROE低下的情況則完全不同,是我們認爲非常危險的投資。要了解我們爲Open Text確定的4個風險,請訪問我們的風險儀表板進行免費查看。

Why You Should Consider Debt When Looking At ROE

爲什麼在觀察ROE時你應該考慮債務問題?

Most companies need money -- from somewhere -- to grow their profits. That cash can come from issuing shares, retained earnings, or debt. In the first two cases, the ROE will capture this use of capital to grow. In the latter case, the use of debt will improve the returns, but will not change the equity. Thus the use of debt can improve ROE, albeit along with extra risk in the case of stormy weather, metaphorically speaking.

大多數公司需要資金(從某個地方)來增加其利潤。這筆現金可以通過發行股票、保留收益或債務獲得。在前兩種情況下,ROE將捕捉到這種資本的使用以增長。在後一種情況下,使用債務將提高回報,但不會改變股本。因此,使用債務可能會提高ROE,但在借款困難的情況下會伴隨着更多的風險,比喻地說。

Open Text's Debt And Its 4.1% ROE

Open Text的債務和4.1%的ROE

It's worth noting the high use of debt by Open Text, leading to its debt to equity ratio of 2.02. The combination of a rather low ROE and significant use of debt is not particularly appealing. Debt does bring extra risk, so it's only really worthwhile when a company generates some decent returns from it.

值得注意的是,Open Text使用了大量債務,導致其債務資本比率達到2.02。相對較低的ROE和大量使用的債務組合不是特別吸引人。債務確實帶來了額外的風險,因此當公司從中獲得了一些可觀的回報時,只有在這種情況下才是真正值得的。

Conclusion

結論

Return on equity is a useful indicator of the ability of a business to generate profits and return them to shareholders. A company that can achieve a high return on equity without debt could be considered a high quality business. If two companies have the same ROE, then I would generally prefer the one with less debt.

企業獲得利潤並將其返還給股東的能力是企業能否賺錢的有用指標。如果一家公司可以在沒有債務的情況下實現較高的roe,那麼它可以被認爲是一家高質量的企業。如果兩家公司的roe相同,那麼我通常更喜歡負債較少的那一家公司。

Having said that, while ROE is a useful indicator of business quality, you'll have to look at a whole range of factors to determine the right price to buy a stock. It is important to consider other factors, such as future profit growth -- and how much investment is required going forward. So you might want to take a peek at this data-rich interactive graph of forecasts for the company.

儘管如此,雖然ROE是業務質量的一個有用指標,但您需要查看一整套因素來確定正確的股票購買價格。重要的是要考慮其他因素,例如未來的利潤增長,以及未來需要多少投資。因此,您可能需要查看這個數據豐富的交互式預測圖。

Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies.

當然,您也可能通過尋找其他地方來找到出色的投資。因此,不妨查看這個有趣公司的免費列表。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論